Defense of inherited privilege, of all kinds, is the logical consequence of where U.S. conservatism has been heading for a long time. That's what estate-tax repeal is all about! 1/
It was already obvious in the Bush years 2/ nytimes.com/2002/11/22/opi…
And we started to see books praising nepotism 3/ nymag.com/nymetro/arts/b…
So defending the British monarchy isn't really a departure. Actually, I'd like to see a poll on how many Rs like the idea of a Trump dynasty. Probably quite a few 4/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Krugman

Paul Krugman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @paulkrugman

21 Mar
Now that the big Biden package has been enacted, we're hearing warnings from some economists — well, one economist — about stagflation. As always, history is extremely useful in thinking about such things; and I've been reviewing the great inflation panic of 2010-11 1/
My sense is that this episode has been widely forgotten, but it's very relevant. Here's what happened: as the economy began to recover from the 2007-9 recession, headline inflation picked up to almost 4% 2/ Image
Producer prices — basically wholesale prices — were rising at a double-digit clip 3/ Image
Read 9 tweets
20 Mar
A friend recently reminded me of this classic case of inflationista scare tactics during the Obama years; what we should have been getting ready for was unjustified inflation panic 1/ wsj.com/articles/SB124…
For a brief moment after the GOP took over the House, Rs went all in on accusing Ben Bernanke of debasing the dollar, basically because of a surge in commodity prices 2/ nytimes.com/2011/02/10/bus…
The Fed, however, stood its ground, because there was no surge in core inflation, which it (correctly) considered a much better guide to policy 3/
Read 8 tweets
17 Mar
There's been a fair bit of Econotwittering about this J.W. Mason post on the American Rescue Plan and what it says about economic theory. I agree with a lot although not all of it, and in any case think some might be interested in my take 1/ jwmason.org/slackwire/the-…
The ARPA definitely marks a big break with the austerity/debt obsession that crippled recovery after the 2008 crisis. That's a very big deal. And even the debate over the bill was very different from what went before 2/
One thing people should realize, however, is that policy orthodoxy in, say, 2011 did NOT reflect macroeconomic orthodoxy in the sense of what the standard models said. In crucial areas it was in flat defiance of what Macroeconomics 101 would have recommended 3/
Read 15 tweets
14 Mar
Private-sector economic forecasters — who are, in practice, very Keynesian — are incredibly optimistic. GS is predicting full Morning in America growth 1/
This may look like a prediction of inflationary overheating, but actually not so much. GS believes we have a 6% output gap, with potential growing ~2% a year. So 8 percent growth only brings us roughly back to capacity by end 2021 2/
And with most of the stimulus behind us, slower growth in 2022 and after. Other forecasts have smaller output gap but also slower growth, so again no major overheating. The overall picture looks like this Brookings chart 3/
Read 4 tweets
13 Mar
There's a real Morning in America vibe among economic observers right now 1/ nytimes.com/2021/03/13/ups…
Surveys of forecasters are very upbeat after the passage of the American Rescue Plan 2/ bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
This comes after predictions of disaster from the Trumpists. (Yes, I made a bad call when Trump won in 2016; I retracted it and apologized three days later). So what will they do? We already know the answer: they'll do what they did in the 1990s 3/
Read 7 tweets
12 Mar
I just debated Larry Summers, again, over overheating and all that, for Fareed Zakaria. Not going to try and spin it; watch for yourself. Also, debating people who are neither idiots nor political hacks is weird, and will take getting used to. But I do have some meta thoughts 1/
You still sometimes hear economists, even those with a public intellectual role, say that their job starts and ends with giving the best possible policy advice; it's up to politicians what they do with it. But in America 2021 that's not a sustainable position 2/
In fact it's not sustainable even if good policy is all you care about, because we have so much polarization and so many political figures acting in bad faith that it's irresponsible not to consider the political implications of your recommendations 3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!