I am tired of mainstream media reporting all of the excuses the misogynistic, racist terrorist gives for murdering 8 people, including 6 Asian women.
Mainstream media & “public intellectuals” also obsessed w/ defending police who push the terrorist’s defenses: lying about his racism, sex addition, etc. Problem not subtlety of how @atrupar or others cover police’s remarks, but why police are spreading the terrorist’s propaganda
Confident that if this terrorist was a minority race or religion, police would not take him at his word on his motives, and report to US about his feelings (he was having a bad day? I don’t care, because I am not sympathetic to him one bit) on the day he murdered 8 people.
Much better if everyone focused more the crime, how it fits into larger pattern of terrorism against Asian-American and other minority populations, and how we can better protect the affected communities. And, like every other terror attack: how was this terrorist radicalized?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is an extremely important article to read about how families can think about the risk to unvaccinated children, after most adults are vaccinate, but in the months or longer it may take until children are vaccinated.
I get the criticism & concern over both the characterization of the risks (an attempt to compare the risk of young children & vaccinated seniors), and the many children (and their relatives) who may have higher risks than the average.
Health & education leaders have all generally come around to the desperate need to open up schools, especially for younger children, due to a rigorous cost-benefit to the children (and their family), especially as teachers & adults get vaccinated.
An otherwise dedicated public servant, Dr. Birx should not be unfairly maligned because she spent the first 8 months of deadly crisis undermining public health, by spreading dangerous disinformation, in order to ingratiate herself with anti-science Dear Leader.
“[Trump] is so attentive to the scientific literature & the details & the data, & I think his ability to analyze & integrate data that comes out of his long history in business has really been a real benefit during these discussions about medical issues,” crooksandliars.com/2020/03/dr-deb…
Mainstream media has an insatiable appetite for rehabilitation tours. But, there are still over 1,000 people dying each day, due to residual impact of Trump's corruption, cruelty, incompetence: maybe we can wait for crisis to pass before rehabilitating the perpetrators?
Regardless of how the cowardly pro-Trump Insurrection senators vote: this presentation by House Managers prosecuting Don Trump is chilling, thorough, clear proof of his crimes against US and will serve as lasting testimony to disloyalty of him & Republican Party still backing him
Senator Romney, only Republican to vote to hold Don Trump accountable in his first impeachment, was basically alone heading towards armed mob when Officer Goodman turned him around: anyone really want to argue they would not have physically harmed him?
A vote to acquit Don Trump of inciting this violent insurrection is basically a vote that you are totally cool with ordering the assassination of @Mike_Pence & his family, in order to overthrow the republic. There is no ambiguity here: Trump was uniquely focused on Pence.
Reason Don Trump's lawyer sounds confused & absurd is because there is no reasonable defense of what he did to US.
It is this simple: an acquittal vote = *for* violent insurrection, and a convict vote = *against* violent insurrection.
There is no debate on facts of what Don Trump did in orchestrating this violent insurrection, there is no debate on nature of the pro-Trump insurrection, and all of the procedural questions are bullshit. Senators are either pro-insurrection (acquit) or anti-insurrection (convict)
Worth taking a look at how Republican/Trump sycophants are simultaneously downplaying their violent insurrection at Capitol on 1/6/21 and exaggerating violence at BLM protests from the summer in desperate false equivalency.
Critical points (1) Republican leaders have sort-of condemned the violence of their Insurrection, while continuing to defend the goals & methods of the violent insurrectionists (2) Insurrection encouraged by core leadership of Republican Party: president, leader in house, etc.
(3) Notice how Republicans keep omitting the police officer murdered at their Insurrection, additional deaths, and subsequent suicides by police officers (4) 140 officers were injured, not 14: biggest mass causality event in a long time