But in fairness, not NZ epidemiology. They sequenced genes and solved this and changed its practises to match. Wow.
Here in Canada we
...
That was the tweet.
I can't find my old garbage can tweet from last year because I've called so many comments and studies garbage in the meantime. That's kind of funny. But mostly sad.
All you need to know about the strident defence of certain threads on here by members of the @WHO is that the two parties have a working relationship.
I posted the above, because of the outrageousness of this post.
My comment, which I'll repost so I don't drag others into this thread:
"Seeing this was unbelievable. Supporting a thread by suggesting anyone against it is attacking in bad faith, AND has been warned, AND that they've been spoken to and have not listened.
Hmm. Asking for specific examples of situations where virus transmitted when people not wearing masks. First of all, asking a lawyer in private practice? How is the lawyer to know the answer to this?
This is why politics is broken. This is stupid theatre.
And there's the answer, population data shows masks work but of course you cannot show individual cases (because we cannot track virus entering body and causing infection).