Phil Syrpis Profile picture
21 Mar, 5 tweets, 1 min read
This appears to have taken off somewhat - thanks for all the retweets and comments.

Several people are asking what can be done. A couple of small suggestions follow. Do share other, no doubt better, thoughts too. 1/5
The first is directed towards those who have the chance to interrogate the Govt (media, MPs etc).

Try to explore their position on these sorts of issues - where do they stand on eg breaches of international law and the Ministerial Code, international COVID comparisons... 2/5
...free speech, the right to protest, cronyism, etc etc. How do Ministers etc seek to explain their position? Juxtapose what they said then with what they are saying now.

Which brings me to the second point. 3/5
The thread would be more effective if it contained clips from Ministers taking inconsistent positions - eg piously denouncing breaches of international law; while belittling their own 'specific and limited' breaches. 4/5
Brushing away international comparisons of COVID death rates; while celebrating the success of the UK's vaccine roll-out. Etc etc.

I was thinking perhaps 'how it started'/'how it's going'. That sort of thing. Maybe? 5/5

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phil Syrpis

Phil Syrpis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @syrpis

21 Mar
The double-standards and hypocrisy of the Govt and its outriders - on almost all fronts - is dizzying. I get that it is a deliberate strategy, but really struggle to understand how so many people are taken in.

Just a few examples... 1/7
The sanctity of international commitments, Treaties and contracts. If we are prepared to breach them when it suits us, how outraged can we really be when the EU, or China, or Russia, does the same? 2/7
The Ministerial Code. Breaches by Patel and Johnson are waved away. But breaches by Nicola Sturgeon are, it seems, in a different category. 3/7
Read 8 tweets
15 Mar
In the Sarah Everard case, there is an emerging trope - criticising those who have 'politicised' her death, and intimating that the protests would not be welcomed by her family and friends.

There are a few things here worth unpicking. Thread. 1/9
First, I am not sure on what basis people are presuming to know what Sarah's family and friends are going through, and how they are reacting to the way things are unfolding. My guess is that they have a wide range of views and thoughts. 2/9
Second, it is worth distinguishing between the publicity which Sarah's death and the investigation into it is attracting; and the broader debate about womens' safety, the role of the police and the right to protest. 3/9
Read 9 tweets
13 Mar
This is appalling. And the Govt is introducing legislation to increase police powers to restrict public protest. 1/2
Literally on Monday, this legislation will get its second reading. 2/2
And I’m reading that Labour is going to abstain. Is that right? Surely it can’t be right? @Keir_Starmer @ThangamMP
Read 4 tweets
11 Mar
Sometimes the news cycle works in ways which are incredibly jarring.

Here are three instances, from the last week, of what may be called 'cancel culture'. 1/5
First, the latest manifestation of the 'war on woke', featuring Piers Morgan and Ian Murray. We are supposed to be outraged by the 'silencing' of these people. 2/5
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…
Second, the Government's latest attempt to silence protestors (the Bill is due to receive its second reading on Monday). I don't think that we are supposed to notice the silencing of these people. 3/5
politics.co.uk/comment/2021/0…
Read 6 tweets
6 Mar
A 1% pay increase for nurses would equate to 'more than £500 million a year'. 1/5

bbc.co.uk/news/56294009
For context, the cost of test and trace (over 2 years) is £37 million. 2/5

thelondoneconomic.com/politics/test-…
For added context, in November, the Govt boosted defence spending (over 4 years) by £16.5 billion. 3/5

gov.uk/government/new…
Read 5 tweets
5 Mar
These (by @hayward_katy and @NashSGC) have set me thinking about Brexit and the NI Protocol in a new way.

The EU has had to be, and will continue to be, *reactive* in the Brexit process. And it is difficult to assess how to react when faced with the UK Govt. THREAD 1/11
The EU's first choice would (I think) have been that the UK did not choose to leave the EU, but rather worked within EU structures. But, it was the UK's sovereign choice to leave, and choose to leave it did. 2/
The question was then how to manage the process of Brexit. The integrity of the single market, and the protection of the GFA, quickly emerged as the EU's primary aims. 3/
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!