“There’s so much confusion. It doesn’t make any sense. But, father, we know this is the result of sin.” Associate Pastor Luke Folsom's prayer to the Atlanta killer's fellow congregants feels rather hollow, because what happened *does* make sense.
Christian fundamentalist culture tells young men that they are destined to be warriors for God who change the world — but that destiny depends on their purity and faithfulness to Him.
Purity Culture combines with that — telling young men (and women) over, and over, and over that their sexual feelings and desires are impure — not just bad, but an implicit threat to the destiny they've been promised.
The culture-war framing baked into the culture of the Christian right sets up more pieces: The "world" isn't simply a place full of people with different sexual mores and convictions. It's a carefully designed series of Satanic traps meant to corrupt and deny him his destiny.
Combine the underlying soup of misogyny and racism that frames women as "temptresses" and "stumbling blocks" rather than fellow human beings? "It makes no sense" is the *last* thing I'd say.
Writers like @C_Stroop and @diannaeanderson have covered this material in depth; I'm really glad that the cultural and religious component of this story is getting national coverage but it needs their perspectives.
I've written about aspects of it as well (medium.com/growing-up-god… touches on elements of it) but their work has much more breadth and depth.
In any case, it's imperative that purity culture narratives around this case and its causes not be taken at face value. "This is the result of sin" is not an acknowledgement of guilt for the construction of a toxic system of abuse and radicalization.
It's an externalization of responsibility — an attempt to cast out the member of the community who "went too far" rather than grappling with the system that pointed him in that direction.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A great example of what “cancellation“ really looks like: loss of ad and subscriber revenue when an influencer pisses of the audience they’ve cultivated. filaxis.pro
The point being: this falls in the same category as business insurance in case you fuck up a gig, or insurance for an athlete whose income can be zero’d by injury.
“Cancellation” — aka audience backlash — is a risk for people whose visibility is equivalent to their livelihood. While that is nontrivial, it has always been thus; no one is entitled to other peoples’ attention.
There are basically three kinds of questions that flow out of these dust-ups:
1. How expansively do you define HTML? 2. How narrowly do you define "programming?" 3. How scared are you that the prestige you associate with your job will be diluted by people you view as plebes?
In conclusion, programming is an activity that consists of meetings and thinking, with text files as a common artifact.
On the one hand, "HTML" is a whole suite of monstrously complex interlocking technologies and a 'programming language' is just "a formal language comprising a set of instructions that produce various kinds of output."
So, for those following along with this bit of drama: the "Custom Shapes" library in Keynote (and other iWork apps) is just a pile of indexed SVG shapes, which is awesome. But where they're stored is a mystery!
The default shapes that ship with each app are stored in Appname.app/Contents/Resou… — but any custom shapes that you add are stored elsewhere. Turns out if you have an iCloud account, they're stuffed into CloudKit Record objects, which are… a lot more opaque.
What this means is that the easiest way to get a large number of custom shapes into an iWork app is still probably "hack a simple import/export script and move a custom shape_library.json into the app itself," backing it up so updates don't wipe it out.
”We are legitimate, and the systems exist to protect us and maintain our role in society; others are illegitimate, and their attempts to change the system must be treated as an existential threat” has always been the underlying frame. This is just honesty.
It may have started as disillusionment, as uncertainty, as fear or even terror. “If this is what a world stacked in my favor looks like, what will it be without that?” But the answer is to build a more just world, where “having the system stacked in your favor” is unnecessary.
But that’s not what they decided to do.
They listened to a man who promised to make them great again. And when he failed they tried to take the symbol of power by force, because they are The Good Ones and a system that doesn’t treat them as such is broken.
I could easily be wrong, but my guess is that this moment in American history will be the dividing line used by GOP members to insist they "weren't on THAT side."
The conflict inside the GOP, fundamentally, is between "get ready for 2022" power-wranglers and "no, burn it all down" bitter-enders who want 45 or nothing.
I don't think the latter have the juice to pull off a real military coup, only lots of damage to people and property. And they've given the former the perfect "Wasn't us!" excuse to power the next two years of "bipartisanship."
They have been doing that and more for a generation. They doxxed clinic workers. They doxed *spouses* of *nurses* and got them fired. They bombed clinics. They assassinated doctors. George Tiller was murdered *in his church* just 11y ago.
Talk about whether tactics are effective in securing change if you like. Talk about whether tactics are *morally and ethically acceptable* if you like. But this "what if anti-abortion protestors had been AGGRESSIVE?!??!!11??" stuff is just mind-blowing.
Obviously plenty of people who opposed abortion (plus contraceptives, sex ed, and other reproductive rights) just sat at home until it was time to vote. But the movement was fueled by *intense* targeting and personal demonization of public figures who supported abortion.