@InBraised If you can trade for free, then your optimal trading strategy (given reasonable return estimates) would be incredibly hyperactive.
You would continuously change portfolio weights according to your latest return estimates.
@InBraised In the real world, this would kill you, because trading frictions would eat away at your PnL.
So, one way to avoid hyperactive rebalancing is to only calculate your return estimates periodically (say once every day, or every week, or something).
@InBraised But this isn't optimal because, if your alpha is good, you want to be calculating it as often as possible. You just only want to be trading when the increase in expected returns from the new position is much better than the old position.
"Wealth management equity/bond rebalance flows are massive and, due to their size, may not be fully dispersed when performance differences (and therefore rebalance trades) are very large.
We might get paid for buying what they're selling around month-end"
"Institutional yield enhancement programs are massive and tend to be info-insensitive sellers of volatility on an up-tick in vol.
This may keep IVs depressed in the short-term, leading to trend effects in IV on significant bad news, which we could profitably trend-follow"
When we talk about something being "stationary" we mean that the observations look like they could be drawn from the same "bag of observations" (distribution), regardless of what time we choose to look at.
If you have some kind of factor that you think predicts future stock returns (or similar) and you are making charts like below, then here are some tips...
We'll go through an example of trying to "time" SPX with the level of VIX.