@intel@ATT@Cigna 3. @Intel told popular.info: "Our policy halting direct contributions to members of Congress who voted against certification of the Electoral College results still applies"
Which tacitly acknowledges Intel is funding these members via the NRCC
6. @ATT told popular.info that it was assured none" of its money "will go toward the re-election of any of those members of Congress" who objected to the Electoral College results
Since money is fungible, this assurance has no practical effect
@ATT 7. @Cigna issued a statement saying it would "discontinue support" of any member of Congress that "hindered a peaceful transition of power."
Then @Cinga donated 15K to the NRSC, a committee run by @SenRickScott who voted to overturn the election results
8. The NRSC also supports the entire Republican Senate Caucus including objectors like @HawleyMO, @tedcruz, and @SenJohnKennedy, who is up for reelection in 2022
@HawleyMO@tedcruz@SenJohnKennedy 9. @Cigna also donated 15K to the NRCC. It told popular.info: "In January, our PAC discontinued support of any elected official that encouraged or supported violence on 1/6, and that remains true."
1. Florida Republicans say the state did an amazing job with the 2020 election and there was no fraud (Trump won!) but they are pushing significant new voting restrictions anyway and are having a hard time explaining why
2. "Some days even I don’t know why I did something"
This is an actual quote from the sponsor of Florida's main voter suppression bill who was pressed to explain why he was introducing the legislation if 2020 went smoothly
1. I've obtained an incredible email that succinctly illustrates the dysfunctional relationship between corporations, members of Congress and the Beltway media.
I need to provide a little background first but it'll be worth it.
Follow along if interested.
2. After 1/6, dozens of major companies suspended donations to members who voted to overturn the election.
Initially the @USChamber was supportive. But this month it issued a memo arguing it was not "appropriate" to cut off funds based on the 1/6 vote
3. Instead, the @USChamber said, we should only hold accountable "those who engaged and continue to engage in repeated actions that undermine the legitimacy of our elections"
Everyone gets one free chance to undermine democracy. It's only fair!
2. Yesterday, Bloomberg reported that Rep. Blane Luetkemeyer (@RepBlaine), a powerful member of the House Financial Services Committee, told donors that "if corporations were going to put him on an enemies list, he would create a list of his own"
UPDATE: @HomeDepot is trying its best to HAVE IT BOTH WAYS on Georgia's voter suppression bills.
The Georgia Chamber said it was "in opposition" to voting restrictions and @HomeDepot told the WashPost (and me) it was "aligned" w/that
So far so good.
@HomeDepot But now @HomeDepot has contacted the Washington Post and said even though they oppose voting restrictions in Georgia THAT DOESN'T MEAN THEY OPPOSE GEORGIA'S VOTER SUPPRESSION BILLS
Huh?
@HomeDepot .@CocaCola, after telling me its position on the bills hadn't changed, told the WashPost that it was also "aligned" with the Chamber.
I'm guessing Coke would also claim that that this does not mean that they are opposed to the bills, but it's hard to say