“Any game book that changes the setting constitutes metaplot!”
Uh. That’s almost every game book…ever.
People in TTRPGs hang on to utterly bizarre, easily falsifiable beliefs like security blankets, when the TRUE core of their complaint is: “I don’t want the game to do that.”
Uh. That’s almost every game book…ever.
People in TTRPGs hang on to utterly bizarre, easily falsifiable beliefs like security blankets, when the TRUE core of their complaint is: “I don’t want the game to do that.”
And “I don’t like this!” Is a FINE point of view. It’s your opinion! However saying “A game book that changes this established world is METAPLOT AND RUINS A GAME!” is not. How? “Oh, er. Uh. It makes it harder to set up a game!”
Don’t buy it.
VOILA! NOW IT DOESN’T
Don’t buy it.
VOILA! NOW IT DOESN’T
(But I’ll let you in on a secret, it never could make your game harder to set up. *YOU* are the one making your game harder to set up by believing there is some baseline “DO NOT GO PAST THIS LINE” in *ANY* TTRPG game. Here’s a hint: THERE ISN’T).
I know that this may come as a shock to some of you, but If you believe there is some limit to where a game line can go: you are the problem, not the game line.
Uh. Sorry?
Uh. Sorry?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
