Okay, so.... I think we've been watching #TheXFiles "My Struggle" episodes wrong.

At least I have been.

The implications are leaving me both more and less frustrated, with MSIV especially. 1/
(This thread should be considered to contain major spoilers for seasons 10 & 11, if you haven't watched those all the way through yet.) 2/
So I started wondering about this when I was thinking particularly of MS2 and how the whole ep. was a hallucination, and almost nothing in it really happened, but what it revealed was what Scully feared and thought and felt (esp. about Einstein). 3/
And at first THAT was really frustrating, like, you're going to give each cornerstone character an ep. like that, and Scully's alone is a *total hallucination?* 4/
But then I wondered if the other MS episodes all fell into that pattern somehow--not that they're all hallucinations. They're not.

But whether all of them revealed some aspect of unreliable narration, or framing that is incredibly subjective to their title characters. 5/
Spoiler alert: Yes.

I think all of the MS episodes are suffused with the subjective viewpoints of their title characters, in ways that we're not really used to and that are pretty different from anything we saw in the original run. 6/
And that to watch any of those episodes in isolation, kind of just comes off as bad writing...

Like the dream logic of MS2 was a lot more apparent to me the 2nd time I watched it. The first time, I just went "You can't actually manufacture vaccines that fast, can you?" 7/
The 1st time I saw MS1, I was really frustrated w/ how the story was being presented yet again as "So is the alien conspiracy real or was the government lying to us all along?!" because like... it's both and I thought we'd more than amply established that! 8/
The aliens were real, AND the government was lying all over the place about everything, and I thought we'd spent like 9 years in the first place more than sufficiently establishing that. WHY are we still asking the question this way? 9/
But part of Mulder's whole obsession was the inability to let go of that incredibly dualistic, all-or-nothing framing of whether everything he believed was The Truth vs. lies.

So that's the thought distortion of Mulder's that pervades that episode. 10/
In MS3, aside from even the explicit discussions of Jackson's paternity (which I don't think are reliable narration, either), you get a whiff of it when Scully says of CSM, "he wouldn't do anything to harm me" or something, and like... What??? 11/
But that's CSM's subjectivity at play--that Scully doesn't think he's the devil or would have anything to do with the plan he's enacting.

All of the MS episodes are, in some sense, stories their title characters are telling themselves. 12/
(Though even when they first aired, I found almost all discussion of this plot line/outrage at the "retconning" really frustrating because, like, why were we considering CSM here? CSM is nothing if not self-serving in all things. It's not that he's always lying... 13/
...But he is ALWAYS framing things in self-serving ways.

And Skinner doesn't have the ability to assess the truth of what CSM's telling him, so why would Scully believe it from Skinner? No matter how much she trusts him? She wouldn't. He doesn't have the expertise. Anyway.) 14/
(I felt like I spent those weeks wanting to shake the whole fandom, going "CSM IS THE DEFINITION OF AN UNRELIABLE NARRATOR.") 15/
Like many, many people, I had serious problems w/ the end of MS4. I could NOT believe that Scully would say the things she did about the son she'd spent 16 years looking for. I found Mulder's final line nonsensical and disconnected from his character's entire history... 16/
But the way I now think we are meant to view those episodes resolves or ameliorates a lot of that for me.

Because MS4 is Jackson's episode. All of it is suffused with the story HE is telling himself. And what Jackson has been through leading up to that point is...not great. 17/
Jackson is, to say the least, probably not real happy with himself leading up to/for most of MS4. He scares people. He seems to be a danger to everyone he cares about. He feels responsible for getting his adoptive parents killed over a stupid prank on his girlfriends. 18/
(Hitting pause; I'm going to have to come back to this after I pack up at work.)
Okay, we're back!

So MS4 is strongly infused with the story Jackson is telling himself. And he's not in a great frame of mind! He probably feels partly responsible for his parents' murders. He seems to get everyone he cares about hurt.... 19/
And the incredibly evil man who may or may not be his biological father wants to use him to end civilization as we know it. He wants no part of it. Not only does he not believe M&S can protect him (they can't), he doesn't want anything to happen to THEM because of him. 20/
HE wants M&S to let him go, as much or more for their sake as his own.

When Scully says "he's an experiment, he was never meant to be," I think that's Jackson's projection/narrative about himself at this point. Not Scully's. Who was *desperate* to find him... 21/
...and tell him she loved him, like, a scene ago.

It's also not new info to us or to M&S! It's a possibility Scully was openly grappling with in S9, but she hasn't loved or wanted William any less b/c of that for all these years! 22/
No, this is Jackson trying to make it easier in HIS head for M&S to let him go, and to have the child and the family they deserve, without him. This is HIS slant on the conversation M&S are having in this scene.

23/
I think he truly sees no way out but his own death. When he tells Sarah "I could die," I think he's being very sincere there, but I also think that's when his plot for the takedown of CSM really begins. I think he really knows what he's doing from that point onward. 24/
[SERIOUS S11 SPOILER. NOT KIDDING. TURN BACK.]

So, as CC asked in the final moments of this interview with the X-Files Preservation Collection @jthornton999, why was Jackson smiling when he rose from the water at the end of MS4?



25/
He saved the world. But maybe more than that, he saved his parents this time. He saved his younger sibling. And he WANTS to believe that they are going to be together, and happy, and safe. 26/
(The tagline of MS4 is "Salvator Mundi," which is Latin for "savior of the world," and I basically have to assume it's meant to refer to Jackson.) 27/
So implications that I think this has...

-I don't think we actually know that CSM is Jackson's biological father. I don't think this is info that has EVER been imparted in a trustworthy way. 28/
...Do I think Mulder is William's biological father? Yes.

Do I think CSM nevertheless played a role in "creating" William, as he says? Also yes.

Do I think Scully was sexually assaulted offscreen in "En Ami" and CSM is "really" William's father? No.

29/
Now, what I don't know is what Jackson actually knows, or believes, about who his father is, vs. what he's projecting himself to believe in his MS4 opening monologue, because he doesn't know how how much access to his mind CSM has... 30/
...And he is going to use that conviction on CSM's part to string CSM along to his own destruction.

I think there is a way in which MS3 & 4 can usefully be seen as a set of competing narratives not so much between CSM & Mulder, as between CSM and Jackson. 31/
(THAT said, I also think there's really something to what Keith Uhlich said in this @XFDPodcast interview about the theme of the spiritual vs. the biological father in the show, and that really made me think a little bit differently about MS4, too.)

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/082… 32/
I think it's entirely possible that CSM is Jackson's biological father, but it doesn't matter, because Mulder is his spiritual father.

But also, the Salvator Mundi, the painting from which this ep's tagline is taken, is of Christ... 33/
And the character most often, most strongly identified with Christ throughout this show, is Mulder. I don't think that's definitive, but it's a resonance. 34/
-I don't think we really know what was going on between Monica Reyes and CSM, or the terms under which she was supposedly working for him, or whether she did so voluntarily.

This is also info that was never imparted under trustworthy circumstances. 35/
BACKING UP A BIT.

A major theme of S10 & 11 was, once again, how M&S need, and are saved by, each other's beliefs. In "Babylon" we see them induct Miller & Einstein into this faith system of willingness to rely on belief you don't share... 36/
...and their partnership becomes a quadrangle of people who can operate this way, and *all* of their perspectives are required to come to a resolution of that case and ultimately save lives. 37/
And I think that ep. serves as a test case for what CC was trying to do with the MS episodes and beyond...that ultimately, four subjective, conflicting approaches to the narrative would be resolved back into a unified story line. 38/
I think CC was trying to do something truly next-level with the structure of the meta-narrative of these episodes.

And sadly...I don't think it worked as well as it needed to. 39/
Maybe it was too opaque. Maybe it was too different from how we were accustomed to watching the show. Maybe there just wasn't the time to make sure it truly worked.

But I don't think most viewers got it while it was happening. 40/
And while it makes me way more okay with the "My Struggle" episodes themselves, it makes me ache even more for the resolution of a season 12 we are most likely never going to see. 41/
~The End~

42/
An addendum to this thread, because I think it's significant.

But Jackson has definitely
definitely
definitely
seen "Donnie Darko."

And it matters to how he's framing his own story.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emily Paige Ballou

Emily Paige Ballou Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @epballou

3 Mar
Okay, trying once again to find something out that I did not manage to find out last year...

In the Midwest, hot cross buns seem to be an Easter thing, and you can pretty much only get them during Holy Week, and you eat them on Easter Sunday...
In NYC, hot cross buns are a Lent thing, and if you wait until Holy Week, or God forbid, Easter, to try to get them, you will not get any.

I kept making this mistake until I figured this out...
Does anyone know the origin of or reason for this difference?

I asked around all over the place last year, and never found an answer. Though I did introduce several people to hot cross buns who had never had a hot cross bun before.
Read 4 tweets
24 Dec 20
A lot of the time when people say that neurodiversity "excludes" people w/ intellectual disabilities or high support needs or nonspeaking people, what they're really complaining about is that we refuse to exclude those people.

We refuse to say "we're okay but they're not."
When we say "these are also fine & acceptable ways to be human" they assume we're discounting that some of us have more challenges or higher support needs than others of us do.

No, we're saying "these are also fine & acceptable ways to be human."
"But some people are *really* disabled!"

Right. We don't think those people don't exist; we believe it's not wrong or shameful to be disabled. We think we all deserve autonomy, respect, and the support & accommodation we need.
Read 6 tweets
14 Jul 20
I don't know who needs to hear this.

But wearing a mask is actually really physically difficult for some people. To the point of impossibility for some, while others may be able to acclimate to one over weeks or months or wear one for a limited amount of time.
If wearing a mask is hard for you, if it fucking sucks and you hate it but you're doing it anyway because you understand the evidence and importance, you're not a bad person and you're not making it up or imagining it. I get it.
I'm a regular hiker who's been previously found to have a normal lung capacity (long story. long, boring, stupid story) and I have real trouble getting up a hill or multiple flights of stairs in one.
Read 9 tweets
19 Aug 19
Everybody, listen.

I know you were taught that person-first language ("put the person before the disability") is always correct. I know. You were taught this when you became a teacher or doctor or when you worked with kids with disabilities.
The problem is that you were taught this by people who themselves were isolated and out of touch from disabled communities.
Person-first language came into being for good reasons. It is not bad or wrong; many people w/ disabilities still prefer it.

But other disabled & autistic people don't, for equally valid reasons.
Read 6 tweets
24 Apr 19
spectrumnews.org/features/deep-…

I don't really have the time or brain space to address every misconception and mistake in @Spectrum's hugely controversial article today, but I need to take issue very, very hard w/ the closing quote...

(Thread incoming)
"But he [playwright Alex Oates] has another suggestion: 'My aim and great wish was to help these parents and therefore their children,” he says about the play. 'If there was a way for those autistic voices to turn their outrage into advice for the parents, I’d love that.'" 2/
...Because it belies a truly egregious level of either ignorance or flat-out misrepresentation of the topic he is addressing here.

Because the autistic community expends...so much time and energy on this exactly. 3/
Read 30 tweets
7 Feb 19
Okay, so fun story: I did my honors capstone paper in college on East Asian ritual puppetry traditions and their connection to continued social marginalization of puppet theater practitioners.... (1/?)
...So I'm actually *kind of* well-versed in the potential of various uses of puppetry in media. (2/?)
And so, when I hear that a production is having an autistic character portrayed by a puppet, no, that is not *automatically* jarring or off-putting to me. I need to know more than that about the context & concept of the production to know how I feel about it. (3/?)
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(