It’s not a “sex act”. It’s an act of violence. Intended to humiliate & disrespect & make clear she doesn’t belong there. Its a territorial marking that unifies cultural bonds between men based on the exclusion of women (even MPs). It’s why staffer filmed himself & shared it. 1/3
The act’s consistent with systemic gendered violence: the notion men control public domain (streets, workplace, politics) & women belong in private home. Male perpetrators of violence often say “she wasn’t in her right place” & Parl is for big swinging (& ejaculating) dicks! 2/3
LNP is dripping w deep-seated & dangerous sexist man-bonding. It serves a clear purpose! It unifies small unrepresentative groups behind agenda of corruption, upward redistribution to private actors & austerity. Women’s cries now piercing this antidemocratic exclusionary program.
Morrison cant stop fkn this up coz he really believes the man/public & woman/private divide. Only way he can empathise w women is via sanctity of family (thru relationships to men). He can’t “see” women as a public social force so can’t fathom political responses to this crisis.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alison Pennington

Alison Pennington Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ak_pennington

25 Jan
Frydenberg said cutting JK & JS at end-March is justified since households & biz increased their savings by +$200B over COVID. Beware of this brazenly dishonest use of macro trends! He is folding low-income people into aggregates w the result that they become invisible. 1/7
Clearly hhlds don’t save at the same rate! While 2020 health restrictions stymied discretionary spending of middle-upper income earners (allowing them to save more), the poorest lifted both essential & discretionary spending (supported by JS/JK). 2/7
ABS data shows COVID Supplement continues to support spending on essentials: paying bills (67%), household supplies/groceries (63%) & rent/mortgage payments (39%) most common uses. Only 26% saved any portion of the supplement in 4wks prior to survey. 3/7 abs.gov.au/statistics/peo…
Read 7 tweets
8 Dec 20
Porter's proposed IR changes signal a dangerous return to WorkChoices-era unilateral employer wage-setting power in enterprise agreements; 2 yrs to push non-union below-Award EAs & fix wages for long periods of time in other EAs. A LOT of damage can be done in 2yrs. THREAD 1/10
First, the sum is greater than its parts; parallel proposals to weaken the Better Off Overall Test, stop unions contesting bad EAs, & the relaxation of requirements governing EA approval process at FWC will expand no. of low-wage non-union EAs. How do we know this? 2/10
It's happened before! In WorkChoices EAs could undercut Awards. Unions were restricted from contesting approvals. The result was explosion in non-union EAs; rising 20%-60% of all private sctr EAs 04-09. See dramatic decline in 09? That's when FWAct & BOOT were introduced. 3/10 Image
Read 10 tweets
4 Aug 20
The government is waging war on the poor. Convincing Australians that millions of victims of this pandemic and economic shutdowns have brought insecurity upon themselves is their aim: "Lazy" "job-snobs" despite a Depression-level collapse in jobs and none to "seek". THREAD (1/8)
Their is an unholy alliance between private unemployment services and the welfare bureaucracy. Billions in public $ is handed to parasitic unemployment "industry" with their activities backed by full force of sanctions. Why is Morrison weaponising unemployment payments? (2/8)
Low income supports reinforce a low-wages IR agenda & protect insecure forms of work. This labour form turns a tidy profit to big companies. The harsh mutual obligations system puts the whole agenda in motion. Today govt reintroduces this system nationally (VIC intro delayed)(3/8
Read 8 tweets
21 Jul 20
JK/JS cuts rip $10b out of economy every month. Austerity is opposite of avoiding Depression! Alongside reintro of Rat-Wheel 4 Poors (mutual obs), cutting govt spending on pretext of economic reboot is totally reckless & undermines public health effort to save lives. THREAD(1/7 )
Morrison says 6mo JK extension needed to aid business planning. But truth is shorter 3mo-extended JS is directly tied into Aus business planning too. It will be leveraged by biz to protect & extend low-wage insecure work. How? (2/7)
Two channels: From Aug 4 JS recipients can be punished for not taking jobs offered by emplymnt services. Where are protections for ppl to refuse jobs w-out enough hrs, pay or sick leave in a pandemic? Our history is dogged w direct biz-govt forced labour programs like this (3/7)
Read 7 tweets
2 Jul 20
Stitch-up alert! PM’s claim reported in @Australian that current #JobSeeker rate is barrier to biz hiring is based on dodgy data. Govt were pre-empting yesterday's release of employer survey data from National Skills Commission. What does this data actually show? {THREAD} 1)
NSC surveyed 2324 employers 25 May-mid-June. Far from showing generalised unmet labour shortages only 555 emplyrs (25%) were recruiting additional staff (the rest were not). Of these firms 166 (30%) said they were experiencing "or expected to have" difficulty filing vacancies 2)
Only 73 firms experiencing hiring difficulty said they didnt have enough applicants. 73 self-defined shortages is hardly a measure of labour demand across the economy. In fact, more firms said applicants lacked the required technical skills or experience (47% or 78 firms). 3)
Read 9 tweets
6 Apr 20
As predicted the wage subsidy has become manufactured terrain by govt & biz to drive a sledgehammer through wages & labour protections. I have some serious concerns w FWAct changes Porter has attached to the subsidy. (1)
FWAct changes would grant employr’s power to cut wages of FT staff to subsidy rate of $1500 p/fn. Full span of control over hrs of wrk incl. power to ratchet up hrs of part-time wrkrs (to squeeze value out of subsidy) is up for grabs. Low hrs women w caring resp. will suffer (2)
In addition to unilateral power to change a workers’ hrs to “match” the subsidy, they are attacking the hourly wage rate. Biz lobbyists are pushing to freeze min wage incrs (or even cut them), & cut wage incrs in negotiated EAs. (3)
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!