1. Listening to call in Judge Amit Mehta's DC court to address Michael Sherwin's @60Minutes interview. LP Edwards, two supervisors John Crab Crim Div Head. Joseph Cuny [sp] also a supervisor. And someone named Basset. Gregory Mazel [sp] US attorney supervisor.
2. Amit Mehta is an Obama appointee and has a background as public defender. All judges enforce the rules but I would think a defense attorney would be especially sensitive to a violation of the local rules.
3. Calling the case.
4. Judge thanks counsel and notes the defendants are not present and notes the court believes it is not required on the short notice. Addressed the 60 Minutes with Sherwin and that he addressed the evidence and noted sedition though not focused on the case. Also noted @nytimes
5. Judge is not happy and hopes the @TheJusticeDept will look into it. Times article devulging internal deliberations is not DOJ policy. He is politely reading the riot act about not talking out of school. He's making clear he will issue a gag order or sanction any attorney.
6. Cites Rule 57.7 and says will enforce it with vigor. He's very calm and very clear that 60 Minutes and NY Times leaks were out of bounds and will result in sanctions if they are repeated. DOJ lawyer is talking. John Crab the DOJ criminal head is there. He's asking about
7. about steps being taken. Crab is agrees with the court about the concert and has taken steps. On 60 minutes, DOJ has rules that deal with interviews and it was not followed and they referred to OPR.
8. On the NY Times, they don't think it was the trial team an OPR will get a referral for the NY Times article. Judge is asking about "guard rails" on high profile matters. And how unusual these comments and reports are.
9. Crab refers to the DOJ Manual and the DC local rules plus the bar rules. Judge wants to be kept informed of the events going forward on the DOJ OPR actions.
Judge is giving the attorneys a chance to be heard. Counsel are commenting. Some reserving the right to file a motion.
10. My comment: @60Minutes should be called to task for inducing an ethical violation. IMO it's actionable. They are saying that 60 Minutes contacted some of the defense attorneys. I think Sherwin will be disciplined. As I reported, I believe he should be suspended or disbarred.
11. Judge makes sure all counsel have had a chance to speak and closes the call.
12. Follow up: OPR operates like a state bar. If they punch your ticket, reciprocity means you're likely no longer licensed anywhere. Sherwin has been around too long to not know what he did. IMO somebody put him up to trying to impair the cases. I wonder who? @TheJusticeDept
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Does @POTUS have power to ban assault rifles without Congress on board? Perhaps. First, remember the text of the 2nd Amendment? “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
2. The Heller case didn’t cite the relevant law and dealt with an esoteric discussion of the 2nd Amendment divorced from the statutory underpinning that currently gives power to the framers’ plan to establish federal control of regulated citizen soldiers.
3. Are you in the Militia? If you’re a male, between 17 and 45 or a female in the Guard, you’re likely in the Militia. law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10…
So what? Well, @POTUS commands the Militia. 10 U.S.C. § 253 provides that
“The President, by using the militia or the armed forces,
Kentucky @GovAndyBeshear is on discussing the bills he will sign and a few he won't. One is to guarantee the cost of insulin does not exceed $30 per month. I'm not sure what he's going to do with the Mitch McConnell can't live forever act.
One thing is clear, healthcare is still an issue that GOP needs to run away from. The insulin subsidy bill was passed unanimously in the very red Kentucky General Assembly.
He's now talking about laws that take away a governor's power as the result of an election. I think that's the McConnell shall live forever bill.
1. Has anyone ever run numbers on what we pay to prevent people from entering the US from our southern border including all legal costs? Economists could analyze the impact on irregular immigration if the money is paid directly to underemployed workers in their home counties.
2. My suspicion is that it would greatly reduce if not end the flood of economic refugees. The money could go directly to the individuals not to the governments that are generally corrupt. It would also give the US a wedge to enforce anticorruption. We would become the paymaster.
3. The majority of the people escaping the Northern Triangle countries are reported to be indigenous people who are being driven off their land by armed gangs that have moved from cities to exploit the regions where the indigenous people live. I'm not entirely clear that the
1. Living in Hawaii anti-Asian Pacific Islander violence is not part of our daily life here. I now understand how prevalent it is on the mainland so rather than simply report on it, I want to try to understand if it is part of an organized terrorist group and if so, who is most
2. culpable that can be sued and economically destroyed. First, do we have proof that @FoxNews@rupertmurdoch have been advancing these terrorist attacks? Are there websites that are pushing the terrorists' ideology that can be taken down?
3. What if anything has Trump or @DonaldJTrumpJr or any of their ilk said since Trump was thrown out of the @WhiteHouse to incite the violence? If there is an organization to these attacks, I would identify the culpable parties, link to deep pockets and then make cases in every
2. and a FISA warrant application requires a showing of probable cause that the target is an agent of a foreign power. The statute makes a distinction between the showing required for US persons and for foreigners.
3. Any person (including a US person)
who, pursuant to the direction of an intelligence service of a foreign power, knowingly engages
1. Let's make is simple: Any company that funds the war on the right to vote should be economically destroyed along with its major shareholders, officers, directors & lenders. Boycott them into liquidating bankruptcies. @USChamber is waking up to the coming boycott Armageddon.
2. Once the donations are seen as a road to Chapter 7, the Sarbanes-Oxley rules will require that the companies act to address the actions of the board, or the audit committee is on the hook. Use the securities laws to destroy the racists in corporate America. @CNBC@jimcramer
3 The GQP is functionally part of the KKK. While it advances the war on voting rights, any money going to the GQP should be considered money intended to take away the right to vote. Expose the large donors. Make their economic activity the subject of constant transparency.