There's a bit in my novel CATFISHING ON CATNET about crisis PR. In the story, Steph hacks an "instructional robot" so that instead of delivering the planned sex ed unit, the robot is just handed over to the AI character, who answers EVERYONE'S questions rather colorfully.
This makes the local news, then spreads nationally, and the communications director of the robotics company finds himself in front of cameras trying to explain that it's the school's fault for not installing a security patch.
Rachel, who's befriended Steph, comments that this guy is a terrible PR guy and the firm is going to deeply regret not calling a crisis management firm.
Two years earlier, she explains, the food manufacturing facility in their town (which makes granola bars) had salmonella contamination:
"My mom's friend Wendy works at the factory doing communciations stuff, which meant running a cute Twitter feed about granola bars and breakfast cereal and writing news releases....
...After the salmonella contamination happened, she got pulled up in front of cameras and said 'Nobody's perfect.' ... They hired a crisis firm and sent Wendy to the mail room for six months."
Steph asks if she ever got her job back?
"Yeah, she's pretty good at writing funny tweets. Also, the salmonella totally wasn't our fault! It was a supplier!"
So yeah, anyway, if my fictional teenagers can tell you when you need a crisis management firm, Cinnamon Toast Crunch, y'all are overdue for making that phone call.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This made me really curious whether Democratic fundraising is vulnerable to similar levels of grift, and I THINK the answer is no, although I'm not 100% sure, but I went digging through the terms & conditions for WinRed, ActBlue, and Anedote, and let me tell you what I found.
If you donate to Democrats, you've probably used ActBlue. I checked their terms & conditions and found basically nothing about fees at all.
This is a good thread and a good explanation and I just want to note, for the record, that @mattyglesias ABSOLUTELY KNOWS EVERYTHING EXPLAINED HERE, he just apparently doesn't think writers should be able to make a living off their books.
I think "life + 30" is a reasonable time frame. The one we've got, "life + 70," is too long and we should have told Disney to fuck off with their bullshit way before we hit this point.
If we had life + 30, all of Theodore Geisel's work would be in the public domain this year.
I keep mentally writing AITA reddit posts on behalf of Harry and Meghan.
"My grandmother rules my entire family with an iron fist. I grew up that way so I was basically used to it -- until I married a wonderful woman and they were so nasty to her and suddenly I could see how awful they were. We moved 5,000 miles away to escape. AITA?"
"My family is trash-talking my wife to the press in a bid to keep me from talking about them publicly. WIBTA if I go ahead and do the interview I've got planned?"
I wrote about some of Dr. Seuss's lesser-known books back in 2015, and if any of the people currently wringing their hands over Dr. Seuss being "cancelled" have ever read "Scrambled-Eggs Super" or "McElligot's Pool" I will EAT MY HAT.
I want to note for the record that it's also not "cancellation" when the people you've entrusted with your literary legacy think that it's in the interests of your literary legacy if some of the books you wrote are allowed to be forgotten.
It is, in fact, entirely normal for a famous and successful writer to have books that stay in print and books that do not. There's a lot of stuff that doesn't age well. Sometimes you can do revisions, sometimes you just let the book slide into obscurity.
I was pondering Internet communities and how certain portions can get really toxic and weird and was thinking about mothering dot com. This thread talks about the straight line that led a depressing number of people from "natural parenting" to QAnon.
When I was a new mom, in 2000, there was a store in St. Paul that sold breastfeeding supplies that I went to, and they also sold Mothering magazine, and I wound up subscribing briefly and finding my way to the discussion boards.
I was a regular poster there for a while. I don't actually remember how long -- after a few months I discovered another community that was a better fit, then moved on from there to a break-away community. (This was a super common experience for an online mom at the time.)