Interesting @kdrum post on the decline of blogs that includes, among other things, this provocative theory for why Google let Reader die, and no other major company picked up RSS effectively. jabberwocking.com/why-have-blog-…
My personal theory of the death of the blogosphere — which is different than the death of blogs, there are still lots of those — is that the blogosphere was built on short links that moved people around, not long essays, and when Twitter disaggregated that, the ecosystem died.
This is also why Substack isn't a replacement for the blogosphere, even if it does feel similar to the best blog posts: that curation and conversation function doesn't translate, both because of subscriber walls and because Twitter just does it better.
The sad thing is Twitter is just a much worse and much less healthy place for this kind of conversation and community than the blogosphere was, but here we are.
Related @tylercowen post here. He's talking specifically about econ Twitter vs econ blogs, and without wading into his whole debate, this point is very true, and an underrated problem of Twitter. Blogging was/is a much better platform for uncertainty: marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolu…
Also @kdrum remains a master of the blogging form and you should all read him. jabberwocking.com
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've interviewed @SenSanders many times over the years. But this conversation is, by far, the most optimistic I've heard him. He changed politics, and now he wants to see how far he can push.
You should listen to the whole thing, but a few excerpts:
"The appetite for larger-scale governmental action could not be more different in 2021. Think of it this way: the Recovery Act was twenty points less popular than Obama. The American Rescue Plan is twenty points more popular than (a pretty popular) Biden."
We can't run the counterfactual but I wouldn't underestimate how much of a role race played in how these bills were seen. Obama was very popular personally, but we know that his presidency led people's views on race to drive their views on all kinds of policy questions.
Part of the GOP's collapse into symbolic politics is that so little gets done in congress, and there are so many excuses for why nothing gets done, that they can afford to indulge all kinds of ideas they know will never pass, and focus on issues with no legislative content.
But it'd be better if politics was a contest between actual legislative agendas, and politicians were disciplined by the knowledge that they may have to pass, and stand by the consequences, of the ideas they claim to favor.
Lots of symbolic progressivism and operational conservatism in Europe's vaccine debacle. So much emphasis on process and solidarity and equity and regulatory deference in ways that made action easy to slow or veto, with disastrous results. nytimes.com/2021/03/16/bri…
Trump's Warp Speed program really does deserve credit, but you can also see the different in how the Biden admin (and various states) have acted: A real emphasis on speed, on pushing government to find ways to get new doses, on adding flexibility even amidst uncertainty.
In crises, government needs to be able to *act*, even at the cost of some other values. There is nothing more progressive than actually having government deliver vaccinations that save people's lives, as fast as possible.
Hope feels like an unsafe emotion lately. Personally and professionally, I don’t want to wax optimistic only to be crushed as deaths rise. Pessimism is safer.
The column was all about the new variants, and the way experts thought we could have a truly hellish period as super-contagious strains exploded before mass vaccination took hold.
I'm angry about the cut to UI and the absence of *any* minimum wage increase in the bill.
At the same time, I'm ELATED the Child Tax Credit is moving through unscathed, and same for EITC, school infrastructure, state and local aid, $1,400 checks, Obamacare boost...
And then there's the coronavirus funding itself, which is huge. Vaccinations are already above 2m a day. Add in tens of billions for distribution, and $50 billion for a national testing infrastructure, and we could really beat this thing.
I'm open to counterexamples, but this still looks like the most ambitious and progressive economic package Congress has passed in my lifetime. It will do more to cut poverty, and push full employment, than anything else I've covered.