right. and a 0 percent vacancy rate is the sign of a extremely unhealthy housing market, where demand greatly outstrips supply and people don’t ever move or change residences
also, if it were true, the homeless population and the unoccupied housing aren’t evenly and equally distributed. are we going to round up homeless people in norfolk and ship them six hours out to bristol and abingdon?
the second part of the answer is good, i should say. virginia needs more tenant protections! more subsidized and public housing! but there is a market rate supply crunch, and it essentially siphons money from renters into the pockets of existing homeowners and landlords.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“The Senate is structurally biased against the party with a large urban constituency therefore we should use our fleeting majorities to pass as much legislation as we can and the filibuster inhibits this” isn’t that difficult to understand.
Also, there is the little thing of how the Republican Party is radicalizing against majoritarian democracy and the only way to shore up the right to vote is with federal legislation that, hey, the filibuster makes impossible to pass.
Many people have written easily available and detailed arguments against the filibuster in its current form and it is probably worth reading them before pontificating on what filibuster opponents think.
I have seen a few tweets chastising folks for describing this bill as Jim Crow adjacent, a criticism which relies on ignoring the obvious context as well as the basic fact that Jim Crow laws did not say, in the text, that they were discriminatory.
The most well-known Jim Crow voting provisions — literacy tests, poll taxes, etc. — were facially neutral laws justified as measures against fraud.
my wife chose KILL BILL, VOL. 1 for our movie tonight so that’s what’s on! i have not seen this since i was in high school
first thought: this movie is very bright and colorful compared to most modern action flicks!
yes! the highly choreographed brutality of the fighting in that scene is something we wouldn’t get in a major studio film again until, what, John Wick?
an annual household income of $400,000 puts one in the top 2 percent of households! no you aren’t a billionaire or multi-millionaire but that doesn’t mean you aren’t very affluent.
great scene, incredibly frustrating movie. denzel is magnetic whenever he is on the screen but the film is built around russell crowe’s much less compelling protagonist
in fairness “great scenes, frustrating movie” is the ridley scott special
absolutely. there’s that whole run of tony scott movies that basically ride on the fact that Denzel is the most compelling screen presence of his generation