In the first, @niccolo_berlin, @jan_c_steckel and @Jakob_MCC dig into who is building, developing, financing and banking for new coal power plants. They differentiate between these four actors, showing the global scope of fossil fuel finance
Here you can see the central roles of China, Japan, the EU and the United States in the financial supply chain.
Note: these are commercial banks and institutional investors. This is about profit and return on investment, regardless of the climate and health consequences.
The banking on climate finance report looks into oil and gas, tar sands, fracking, LNG and coal projects. Again we see enormous sums from familiar names
These studies make visible what has likely gone on for a long time. They also reveal the hypocrisy behind #climatedelay discourses that push responsibility to foreign countries and distant fossil fuel projects.
The fact is we have jurisdiction over many of these companies, which ought to be used without delay
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Our article is a review. We ask the question "What are the social outcomes of climate policies?" and set out to read the ex-post literature.
That means we found as many studies as we could on *actual implemented climate policies* where social outcomes were documented.
(Methods side note: how did we find all that literature? YES, MACHINE LEARNING. We trained a computer to read 45,000 article abstracts and sort out the relevant ones for us to review. Still ended up reading 4650 abstracts though... leading to 203 articles included in our review)
Some things I learned from meeting planetary health researchers and doctors at @IASS_Potsdam last week...
1. Doctors know how to talk to people about climate 2. Doctors understand their job is political 3. Doctors deal with some tough research
1. Talking about climate is like giving a cancer diagnosis. You need compassion and professionalism. Doctors trusted and well placed to do this. They know to spend 10% of the discussion on diagnosis and 90% on questions, solutions and actions.
2. Political aspects of climate action are obvious to health professionals. They have seen the success of multi-faceted smoking policies targeting both structural and individual elements of consumption. They have seen the failure of obesity policies targeting only the latter.