Share this page!

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture
Twitter logo
25 Mar, 4 tweets, 2 min read
CNN's Defense of Chris Cuomo's Special COVID Privileges is Grotesque

greenwald.substack.com/p/cnns-defense…
How can a media outlet credibly claim to denounce abuse of power by political officials when they defend and glorify their own anchor's participation in it?

CNN's attempt to glorify the participation of their news host in family corruption is insultingly deceitful.
What's most amazing is Chris Cuomo "interviewed" his brother on CNN just *weeks after* their abuse of state resources to obtain testing. The interview began with them both acknowledging that the state had serious resources constraints to provide testing.

So Chris Cuomo, at the time 49 years old, got his brother to deprive others more in need of testing and other medical attention -- all using state resources -- and CNN is *defending* this behavior as noble and understandable. What a massive disgrace.

greenwald.substack.com/p/cnns-defense…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture
26 Mar
Congress, in a Five-Hour Hearing, Demands Tech CEOs Censor the Internet Even More Aggressively [for subscribers]

greenwald.substack.com/p/congress-in-…
The repressive objective of Congress is to transfer the power to police political discourse from these tech giants to themselves.

The hearing yesterday was a stunning display of authoritarianism: one member after the next issuing threats if their censorship demands are not met.
Having endured all five hours of it, I could not help but take a brief detour to express how bizarre it is to watch the way Mark Zuckerberg "communicates." There's nothing like it, and he united all members across the political spectrum in visceral contempt. Image
Read 10 tweets
Glenn Greenwald Profile picture
25 Mar
Just as the current epidemic of online censorship began with the age-old tactic of targeting someone widely disliked (Milo, then Alex Jones), these censors are trying to create a censorship precedent for Substack by forcing them to boot one bad writer, then expand from there:
That's the tactic of state and non-state censors always:

Let's find the first target that everyone hates so nobody cares when they're silenced. Then we'll have instituted this power and then we can use it far more widely.

You have to fight it in all instances, from the start.
These people are so fucking broken. It's not enough for them to refuse to read a site or refuse to write there, which is totally within their rights.

They can't stand that there's any venue they can't control, where people are free to speak. They're little petty wannabe despots.
Read 6 tweets
Glenn Greenwald Profile picture
25 Mar
For the third time in six months, Congress is summoning tech CEOs to testify in order to badger and coerce them to censor the internet more. Google's Pichai, Facebook's Zuckerberg & Twitter's Dorsey will all testify. I wrote about it here last month:

greenwald.substack.com/p/congress-esc…
Congress has a legitimate role to play in overseeing tech giants, especially given its (valid) assessment that they wield classic monopoly power.

But they're not doing anything about that: they're instead trying to co-opt that power to censor the internet for their own interests
It's extra creepy somehow watching members of Congress sitting in their homes as they warn tech CEOs that they need to stop censoring the internet more or else they will enact laws to regulate and force them to do it:

Read 14 tweets
Glenn Greenwald Profile picture
25 Mar
1/ Estou vendo muita confusão sobre o que significa "ser judeu". Sem comentar sobre nenhum indivíduo (cuja história eu não conheço), é importante entender que - ao contrário da cristianismo - "judeu" tem um significado racial / étnico e também religioso. Estes são separados.
2/ Segundo a lei judaica, qualquer pessoa nascida de mãe judia é judia - não importa o que acredite sobre Deus. É por isso que pode ter um ateu judeu, ou um judeu budista, ou mesmo um judeu que orar pro Jesus. Este é o sentido em que "judeu" significa uma identidade étnica/racial
3/ Mas tb tem um componente religioso: qualquer ser humano, de qualquer pais, pode se tornar judeu se passar pelo processo de conversão (o que é bem difícil). Essa é a definição religiosa de judeu: alguém que acredita nos princípios do Talmud e que observa o judaísmo religioso.
Read 4 tweets
Glenn Greenwald Profile picture
24 Mar
I don't know the specifics of this new Yale case, but Alan Dershowitz spearheaded one of the worst censorious campaigns in recent times when he worked for years to destroy the academic career of Norman Finkelstein for the crime of criticizing Israel:

nytimes.com/2007/04/12/art…
Along with others, I also battled Dershowitz when he attacked Brooklyn College for hosting an event with Israel critics: many tried to defund them.

For people on the right and left: there's no such thing as a part-time, selective free speech advocate.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
In 2014, Univ. of Illinois rescinded a faculty offer to Steven Salaita, a Palestinian-American professor, after his tweets criticizing Israel on Gaza caused some Jewish students to claim they felt "unsafe" (the school eventually paid him $900k to settle).

nytimes.com/2014/09/13/wor…
Read 4 tweets
Glenn Greenwald Profile picture
24 Mar
The U.S. Intelligence Community, Flouting Laws, is Increasingly Involving Itself in Domestic Politics

greenwald.substack.com/p/the-us-intel…
A newly obtained letter from House Intelligence Committee members demands answers from the DNI about illegal breaches of the wall guarding against CIA and NSA domestic activity.
The U.S. security state apparatus regards the agenda of “domestic violent extremists” as “derived from anti-government or anti-authority sentiment." In sum, to DHS, an “extremist” is anyone on left or right who opposes the prevailing ruling class & system for distributing power.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @ggreenwald has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @ggreenwald!

Read all threads by @ggreenwald