Last week I lamented the disappearance of voice memos from my wife's iPhone, somewhere over the course of iOS upgrades + phone transfers via iCloud. @ElcomSoft saw my frustration that most tools were unable to scrounge iOS 14 iCloud backups + took pity. Thank you @ElcomSoft! 1/
The @ElcomSoft "Phone Breaker" application was able to download iCloud backups, including from a phone we lost several months ago, that she stopped actively using in 2017. Thanks to that backup, we were able to recover lost memos from 2012-2017 as plain sound files. 2/
The software is great. "Phone Breaker" sounds so adversarial and hackerish, and I am very grateful for it. I'd recommend it highly. But what's a bit frustrating is that all it did for us are things by rights @apple should allow us to do for ourselves. 3/
We pay expensively every month for the storage we backup to. The data is ours. It is opaquely encoded, but it decodes to an ordinary hierarchical directory structure. (The same is true of iOS backups you make to your own devices.) 4/
I wish @ElcomSoft only the best, but why should users have to pay for not-so-cheap third-party software (expensive in part because @apple apparently plays a cat-and-mouse game of trying to break the software) to have usable access to our own data? 5/
Besides recovering what lost data we could, I'm excited to use @ElcomSoft Phone Breaker to archive our synced data, especially our photographs. 6/
Though we keep one Mac configured to "Download Originals To This Mac", there's no obvious feedback abt how complete this archive Mac's libraries are of the photographs we take from our iPhones. What abt rarely-logged-in users? It's yet another opaque Trust @Apple situation. 7/
We're fucking narcissists with a small kid, but these pictures really matter to us. A convenient way of archiving Our Own Synced Data on media we control doesn't seem like the kind of thing one should have to buy "forensic" software for. 8/
In general, corporations intentionally infantilize users by making data that is "available" difficult or annoying to get. Will your bank let you download statements and other documents as an annual archive, rather than several-clicks-per-document one at a time? 9/
Mine won't. So I make them (and the environment) pay to mail everything. If there's a gap in my download history I can revert to paper or scanned files. That's dumb. 10/
It'd be great if @ElcomSoft provided a tool called "Bank Breaker" we could use to ensure we have complete archives of *our own financial data*. But that, I suspect, would be even more controversial than their current offering. 11/
In any case, I'm really grateful to @ElcomSoft for helping recover some files my wife really cares about. 12/
I'm really angry at @Apple for not making it easy for users to take control of their important data, for encouraging iCloud backups of past-week-only snapshots and a convenience plus "trust-me" attitude despite backup processes that are far from safe or foolproof. 13/
(Shame on me for being an extraordinarily devoted customer of @Apple's I suppose. But while the alternatives offering convenience for technologically not-so-interested family are mostly @google, mb @amazon, and @Microsoft, they're still probably the best of a rough bunch.) 14/
(Note: iCloud backups to not seem to be Time-Machine-style continuous backups. Two snapshots of each device were available. It's only due to the accident of an old phone's old backups lingering that we were able to recover these files. It's a very limited kind of backup!) /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Randy Waldman

Steve Randy Waldman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @interfluidity

8 Mar
this by @lymanstoneky is worth a read, but i think he’s wrong to be so sanguine things are within historical norms. it’s not mere “left” sour grapes but the ideological sorting of the parties and winner-take-all governance that has raised the stakes of representational skew. 1/
we’d be better off with an electoral system that rewarded multiple parties and fluid coalitions. 2/
short of that, under the existing sorted and polarized two-party system, we need tight representational accuracy to prevent a winning party from gaming the degrees of freedom into durable dominance (by ideology if not party, as the parties will adapt). 3/
Read 4 tweets
21 Feb
Usually the YIMBY proposal is to take zoning decisions out of local hands, on the theory that at the municipal, regional, or state level addressing housing crisis can outweigh idiosyncratic NIMBY resistance. 1/
This proposal by @johnrmyers and @michael_hendrix flips that intuition on its head, arguing that at a sufficiently hyperlocal level, there are plenty of city blocks that would not object, that might for their own idiosyncratic reasons desire, “upzoning” of one form or another. 2/
If we enshrined a hyperlocal *option* to upzone, on terms agreed by immediate neighbors, would enough tiny sovereignties opt for granny flats or fourplexes to put a dent in housing supply bottlenecks? 3/
Read 6 tweets
7 Feb
the powerful have always had to self-censor. it’s a prerequisite of wielding power nondestructively. if you’re Fed chair, you don’t get to say what you think candidly in any context it might leak. presidents must be careful not to insult a wide range of delicate sensibilities. 1/
much of “cancel culture” comes from the fact power has become more divorced from formal public roles, so people who don’t understand that their institutional position demands self-censorship, who don’t think they’ve “signed up for this”, face the actual requirement of it. 2/
you thought you became a journalist to speak truth to power, to transgress, but once you’re at the NYT you wield power, and all the powerful, you must be careful about how you express your truths. you haven’t changed, but the social facts surrounding your words have. 3/
Read 11 tweets
30 Jan
when the r/WSB guys realize their quarry is not high-short-interest hedge funds after all, but option writers and importantly their brokers, does that make them less or more enthusiastic about their games? 1/
so much of financial intermediation depends upon modeled distributions of asset price moves. what r/WSB did was basically to take direct control of some assets and make their prices move in ways to which the models would have given infinitesimal probability. 2/
if intermediaries update their models for much thicker tails, margin requirements become huge, and products like options become much more expensive. that would be disruptive. 3/
Read 6 tweets
3 Jan
@chulsookim2 @morganmz @ngpsu22 oh, you are absolutely right that falling housing prices would be extraordinarily disruptive, would break a lot of families’ (and investors’ and banks’) finances. that we’ve allowed this to emerge is precisely the problem. 1/
@chulsookim2 @morganmz @ngpsu22 to become richer as a society, we want the price of housing, including high quality, desirable amenity housing, to fall. 2/
@chulsookim2 @morganmz @ngpsu22 but we’ve created institutional arrangements under which increasing overall wealth in that very important way is financially and so politically intolerable to the more affluent part of our society, whose wealth is largely concentrated in homes. 3/
Read 6 tweets
7 Dec 20
@ZeeshanAleem @ggreenwald @HeerJeet @ryangrim @sunraysunray There is often a strong tension between quality standards for individual pieces and quality of conversation. Imposing high quality standards at an individual piece level restricts participation, both between and within writers. 1/
@ZeeshanAleem @ggreenwald @HeerJeet @ryangrim @sunraysunray Within a writer, more good might come from publishing weak pieces with "half-baked" ideas that others can elaborate upon than imposing a high bar on her own writing's quality. 2/
@ZeeshanAleem @ggreenwald @HeerJeet @ryangrim @sunraysunray Between writers, if the standard for participation in a conversation is the beautiful craftsmanship that good editing can help to deliver, those who aren't institutionally placed to have such editing will be excluded, along with the contributions they might furnish. 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!