I feel like I'm having trouble calibrating on this one because "priorities of WH reporters diverge wildly from those of the public" is such a deeply normal media problem.
Just seems like after weeks of claims that press conferences were in the public interest -- not just in the interest of reporters -- there'd be a little more alignment there!
"While journalists often treat themselves as passive observers of political events, the volume and tenor of coverage they provide actually shapes the views news consumers have of the importance of different stories." mediamatters.org/abc/border-cri…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was working the Saturday morning shift back in 2013, watching Carlson's show at the time, Fox & Friends Saturday, when Walden, then the NRCC chair, came on for an interview.
At the time, the big story in Washington was the sequester, the mandatory budget cuts required under a deal between Obama and the Republicans. The GOP was trying to make hay over the stuff the Obama admin was supposedly cutting and not cutting.
Fox News spent virtually no time on Trump’s call for his supporters to get vaccinated, giving the comments roughly 6 minutes 30 seconds of coverage in the following 36 hours. mediamatters.org/fox-news/fox-n…
Trump's comments were important because his supporters are the ones most resistant to vaccination.
But they'll only have an impact if those followers hear about them -- and Fox isn't doing its part to make that happen.
Fox has a particular responsibility here because its hosts have convinced viewers not to trust any other news source. That means that they're the best way for Trump's comments to reach that audience.
DOJ/FBI/DHS/CISA assess that Putin "had purview over the activities of Andriy Derkach," the Ukrainian legislator who collaborated with Rudy Giuliani on Biden smears (these were championed by OAN in particular).
The agencies claim that the notion that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election is false -- Sean Hannity pushed this one relentlessly, stoking Trump's rage toward the country. mediamatters.org/sean-hannity/s…
Right, the report: "Russian proxies... made contact with established U.S. media figures and helped produce a documentary that aired on a U.S. television network in late January 2020."
Left, OAN documentary that aired January 25 of that year.
Also, they are both bad and relatively modest, speaking either to the Republican Party's lack of ambition on policy or its unwillingness to openly discuss what it would do if it could pass bills with a majority.
(I think it's probably the latter and they'd do a bunch of bills to limit voting if they got the chance.)
Fox News learned nothing from its deadly coronavirus failure.
A year after the network's downplaying of the crisis helped fuel a catastrophe, it's become a platform for anti-vaccine talking points. mediamatters.org/coronavirus-co…
Fox has a unique moral responsibility with regard to public health because it has successfully convinced viewers not to believe news from any other media outlet. It's the primary source that can reach its audience.
But for crucial weeks in late February through mid-March a year ago, Fox treated the coronavirus primarily as a political problem to solve for President Donald Trump.
tfw you are so disgusted by leftist filth that you just have to keep playing the video over and over again
Fun fact! In 2007, Laura Ingraham noted Fox News' “constant” use of video depicting scantily clad women as part of its news reports, and said the practice indicated "a rampant midlife crisis going on on this network among the male anchors." mediamatters.org/laura-ingraham…