The flaws in the argumentative logic are so cringe-worthy, but also so telling. I've been trying to articulate the ironies and problems with current PRC whataboutism over racial, indigenous issues (next)
This trolling is seemingly premised on the idea the "Americans" (as a collective) want to defend our national past, and have no grounds to critique CCP. But in fact, the obvious answer is "yes, coerced cotton-picking is bad. That's why we're calling it out (next)
when YOU do it!" Interning and torturing people because of ethnicity is very bad. So we're calling it out. Trying to eradicate a group's language is very bad. Stop trying to erase Uyghur. (next)
The flaw in the PRC foreign ministry argument is not just that good Americans will say "no shit. Racism sucks. So stop doing it yourself." It's the inability of the PRC state to see that people elsewhere don't agree with everything their own state has done and is doing (next).
and aren't supposed to. (next)
That's why these are called "crimes against humanity." We respond to them as humans, not citizens. US may not have standing 沒資格 to criticize, as Yang Jiechi said. But as humans we always have the right and obligation to call out abuses to human rights. And, in theory, (next)
people can speak through their state: a democratic state criticizing human rights atrocities abroad is speaking as a representative of the people, reflecting their values. So do NGOs, international organizations, charities I support, etc. Many problems in implementation (next)
and abuses past and present, of course. But that's the idea and goal. So PRC foreign ministry appropriating images of Black sharecroppers to get us to buy Xinjiang cotton is -- (next)
so bewilderingly clueless. It offends, but doesn't begin to persuade. People in democratic states are people, we don't have to tow party line or endorse all past or present acts of those states. In fact, we usually don't. The horror and outrage we feel against CCP (next)
policies in Uyghur region is not a function of our citizenship, but of being human, which Chinese people are too. Take pot-shots at US history, if you want--I'll agree with you. (next)
But these don't begin to convince humanity to condone cultural erasure, torture, forced labor, internment, "optimizing population" and other atrocities in the Uyghur region and inflicted on diasporic XJ natives everwhere. In fact, these trenchant comparisons highlight (next)
what's going on.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Millward 米華健

James Millward 米華健 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JimMillward

20 Jan
State Dept determination, 1/19/2021, that PRC policies in Xinjiang Uyghur Region comprise genocide and crimes against humanity is important. Below, first, essentials, then I'll discuss Pompeo's lies in the statement (a thread for the record) 1/22 bit.ly/3nTi5ig
This follows a November Biden campaign statement calling the policies in Xinjiang "genocide," so we can expect the new administration will continue to endorse this determination once it takes office tomorrow 2/22. axios.com/biden-campaign…
To be more than rhetoric, however, such a determination must serve a strategic purpose. Hopefully, will help Biden admin rally other nations to collectively condemn PRC treatment of Uyghurs and others. EU, Britain have trade deals with PRC pending; they should think again. 3/22
Read 22 tweets
18 Jan
This needs to be explained. The Covid reasons explain foreign places: Hing Kong, Macao, Taiwan. It does not explain excluding Uyghurs (next)
Is there an outbreak in Xinjiang? Not reported. And Uyghurs are only one component of Xinjiang’s population. So Uyghurs are forbidden for a different reason.
There seems to be a blanket prohibition on Uyghurs at public and tourist sites across China. I recently heard a cab driver say that Uyghurs are not allowed to visit 3 Gorges Dam—“it’s said they cause trouble 据说他们作乱 “ was his reason.
Read 4 tweets
15 Nov 20
Coordinated disruption of Brandeis webinar on Xinjiang: a thread. web.archive.org/web/2020111504…
Link above is archived version of a letter sent to Brandeis Chinese students by the Chinese Students and Scholars Association. It says the event would disrespect Chinese people (forgetting the Uyghurs are also Chinese people?) and that critical academic events are inappropriate.
There's a template in English at the bottom for letters to be sent to Brandeis president and, interestingly, to the University Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Indeed, those offices received these letters, but of course did not cancel the event as the letters asked.
Read 17 tweets
15 Nov 20
Some too-loose writing by @nyt @KatherineKornei about early horse riding in Xinjiang. Mistake is saying that Xinjiang in 350 BCE was "China": it wasn't politically, and it wasn't culturally. (Thread)
nytimes.com/2020/11/13/sci…
Story says scientists found "oldest direct evidence of horseback riding in China" and implies this is riding by Chinese or proto Chinese, in contrast to "neighboring civilization" in Mongolia. But western boundaries of Zhou and Qin empire were some 1700 km east of these burials.
People in Shirenzigou and Xigou were "neighboring" proto-China too, just like Mongolia was. So these were not Chinese horse burials, but burials found in PRC. Abstract in Proc of the Nat'l Acad of Science @PNASNews makes the same mistake pnas.org/content/early/….
Read 11 tweets
29 Oct 20
Zoom is at it again. Last summer it cancelled meetings about Tiananmen and Hong Kong. Now it has cancelled university meetings about Palestine (SFSU) and meetings about the cancelation (U Hawaii Manoa) and NYU. mesana.org/advocacy/lette…
A third party service provider simply cannot be allowed to determine content on our campuses. If they say their corporate policies require them to do so, our university policies must require us to cancel our contracts. There are other providers of the same services.
Note that while Zoom is censoring just as it did China-related content last summer, this time there is no excuse of obeying "local laws" from authoritarian countries. The security / accessibility problem in authoritarian countries is a tough question since all providers face it.
Read 7 tweets
5 Oct 20
Chinese student jailed for his social media activity while a student at Minnesota. This is a test for University of Minnesota @UMNews --and other universities who should join in solidarity and strength: axios.com/china-arrests-…
I assume and hope Minnesota @UMNews is working behind the scenes on this student's behalf, providing legal aid, involving US State Dept., tapping alumni in PRC, opening back doors, whatever is possible and advisable. But
There are other levers: University of Minnesota @UMNews has a Chinese Visiting Scholars Initiative that should at least be brought up in these conversations. How can we encourage scholars to come to US if they will be arrested upon their return? chinacenter.umn.edu/funding/visiti…
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!