Chinese student jailed for his social media activity while a student at Minnesota. This is a test for University of Minnesota @UMNews --and other universities who should join in solidarity and strength: axios.com/china-arrests-…
I assume and hope Minnesota @UMNews is working behind the scenes on this student's behalf, providing legal aid, involving US State Dept., tapping alumni in PRC, opening back doors, whatever is possible and advisable. But
There are other levers: University of Minnesota @UMNews has a Chinese Visiting Scholars Initiative that should at least be brought up in these conversations. How can we encourage scholars to come to US if they will be arrested upon their return? chinacenter.umn.edu/funding/visiti…
And Minnesota @UMNews has a program expressly for training Chinese administrators, govt. officials, faculty, business leaders. They've worked with 3000 such since 2017: chinacenter.umn.edu/mingda/about-m… This, too, should come up in conversations about the persecuted student, because
a university cannot in good conscience work with professionals if they will be persecuted upon their return to China. Such exchanges are impt and must continue: But universities in the US have enough problems trying to stop Trump from banning Chinese students & blocking visas..
If CCP jails students for cartoons and further impinges on academic freedom--for what they read? What's on their phones and laptops? If CCP does that, we who favor robust cultural and academic interaction with Chinese friends won't be able to help against the China-bashers.
So a kid tweets Winnie the Pooh? Suck it up, CCP. There are much bigger issues before us. And U Minnesota, gather allies from other universities, and push back HARD against this--for the sake of continued academic exchanges. Help the student, but make the broader case too.
CCP is killing a chicken to scare the monkeys. If you let this go, there will be no end of it. We owe it to our Chinese students and colleagues nationwide to make killing this chicken an expensive and counterproductive gesture.
And to all the VP's for international affairs at Minnesota and other US universities: you can't go it alone with this kind of thing. Get together and make a joint, public response. The CCP leaders' own kids are in your schools, so
There is a lot of leverage to protect academic freedom AND strong academic ties to PRC, if you'll just use it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting thread here from Sheena Greitens about distinguishing between Uyghur Region and Tibet region indoctrination and coercive labor policies. But I think “security” in the wrong lens to see this through. (Thread)
If viewed as attempts aimed at ethnic assimilation in PRC colonies, the common denominator of both XUAR and TAR policies is clear. Neither people present serious threats to security other than in the colonies themselves. But after 70 years, persistent
Tibetanness of Tibetans confounds Xi’s CCP. They have abandoned pluralist multi-minzu approaches of the early CCP in favor of coercive assimilationism. Turning farmers and herders into regimented factory workers is the method de jour, sold as poverty alleviation. Again,
To the folks on the left who (I guess) think that because Trump administration is sanctioning officials in Xinjiang and listing companies conected to the genocide, the reports of genocide must be bullshit, I say
Use your head. Read around. There are lots of detailed sources reporting with many different types of evidence, transparently cited. Many many separate media reporting this independently. Don’t believe faux-lefty sites with dubious relationships to authoritarian states.
And sad as this may be to accept, both CCP and Trump admin are deplorable. I hate Trump with a passion, but there are folks in his admin who legit care about the Uyghurs and use his desperate China bashing to implement US policies that might have some impact on the situation.
Seems to confirm scale of camps system (1.3 million a year). Journos and scholars got it right. This may also include people put through mandatory "educational transformation" without being confined--the less punitive tier of the huge punitive system. scmp.com/news/china/pol…
Worth noting: PRC only provided free public education (including Chinese language) in Xinjiang countryside since 2014. There might have been a better way to educate than charging subsistence farmers for school for 65 years, then suddenly locking millions in camps. But---
This is not really about education, and never was. It's a form of collective punishment and attempted ethnic assimilation.
Disney CFO said they filmed Milan in Xinjiang” to accurately depict some of the unique landscape and geography for this historic period drama.” But XJ was not under Chinese rule when film set. This was not historically accurate. nytimes.com/2020/09/12/bus…
If XJ wasn’t building a gulag while Disney was filming, it might have been fine to filme there because the landscapes are cool, like New Zealand where they also filmed.
But don’t say it’s historically accurate to put Mulan in XJ. The whole “Rouran are attacking the Silk Road”‘ fake story normalizes PRC claims to ancient presence in Xinjiang. At that period there was no “Chinese” presence in what is now Xinjiang or Silk Road outposts.
I used "a" in the first edition of EC. So did Jay Dautcher: he spoke great Uyghur, and used "a Uighur" in his Down a Narrow Road. @RianThum uses "a Uyghur" in his Sacred Routes (except once on p. 207 where "an Uyghur" slips in!)
RFA uses "a Uyghur," interestingly. But PBS goes with "an." The Independent writes "an Uighur," yes, with the "i," as does NYT. Clearly, this is not something to make too big a thing about, but it's so easy for me to change in my book at this point!
Thanks for the helpful replies. From these at least, 朝 is clearly used in different compounds to mean the current state / court, maybe current reign era. I don’t think the sense of family “dynasty” is strong.
Many of you intuited what I’m getting at: why not refer to these states as states? English / French “Dynasty” as used for China implies, it seems, that families come and go but the state remains. I don’t think past Chinese usage gave that sense. (More)
States definitely come and go in Chinese historiography. Their names change. Something continues, but not the 國,not the 朝. Yet we use “dynasty” like it’s just changing the batteries in the same device. New wine in the same bottle.