Trying to organize my thoughts here: First and foremost thanks to all the journalists, friends, sources and others who made noise tonight to get me out. @ShotOn35mm for filming it & @steffdaz for calling my fiancee. I was mostly worried about her finding out via Twitter.
It is insane to me that I wrote this story 7 days ago. Lexis and I were standing next to one another tonight. I definitely made some joke about like "they wouldn't do this again, right?" Clearly my comedic timing is off.
Gonna try and do this objectively. Some facts: Yes, @LAPDHQ declared a dispersal order. They gave people well over 20 minutes to disperse. They had been getting hit with strobe lights and been taunted, but I didn't see anything thrown at them until after they charged the crowd.
That being said, the protesters who had been engaging with them were starting to backpedal about a 30 seconds to a minute before the dispersal order changed to "you are no longer free to leave, you are under arrest."
At that point, officers appeared from an adjacent alleyway on Lemoyne and kettled people in. Most protesters at that point put their hands up and waited to be arrested. I was standing in the space between the police line and the protesters when I got grabbed.
I announced myself as press several times, and credit to the arresting officers, they checked my credential pretty quickly and got a supervisor. They seemed to be aware this was ... not how things were supposed to go.
Then I got to meet Sgt. Etheridge. Sgt. Etheridge, objectively speaking, is an asshole. Didn't care I was press and when explained to him this was a bad idea and abnormal as compared to the dozens of LAPD protests I had covered in the past, he said "this is the policy tonight."
From there the arresting officers did what they were told. They were polite. Two other ranking officers showed up, figured out who I was (thanks again to all the Twitter noise), and let me go. I appreciate that, and I can acknowledge mistakes were made and move on. BUT...
There are still @KNOCKdotLA reporters in custody. @ShotOn35mm called me after I got out, told me he was STILL in a kettle. I managed to get hold of an officer in media relations who rushed to do something about it. I'm still worried he might have gotten arrested otherwise.
I'm not blind to the fact that crowd control situations are difficult. I'm not even mad I was initially detained. But once I was in custody, not a threat to anyone, zip tied, and displaying creds ... that should have been game over.
It wasn't. More than one officer asked why I didn't stay in the "media pen." I went over to the media pen, by the way. Media pens are deliberately setup to keep reporters AWAY from news. Tonight was no different. It was nowhere near the protests or action in the park.
I'm a cops' kid. Policing is hard. I have a lot of respect and sympathy for officers. But the LAPD has a long history of problematic behavior with protests & crowd-control situations. This is something that desperately needs fixing, and not just because I got zip-tied for an hour
Last night I saw less-lethal launchers used at close range on people who did not appear armed or threatening. I saw officers snatch up a tent and stoke tensions less than a minute after one of the main voices of the encampment was trying to de-escalate the situation.
I've repeatedly written about the department's over-reliance on mass arrests in these situations. They have been sued to high heaven over this, and they were recently excoriated over problematic use of less-lethal launchers like I described again.
This is how protest gets stifled. This is how people get hurt. Or worse. I'm being critical because I want you to be better @LAPDHQ, not because I don't understand the challenges. But #JournalismIsNotACrime. Neither is protesting.
Whoops, bad at Twitter: This story -- latimes.com/california/sto…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Queally

James Queally Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JamesQueallyLAT

26 Mar
Crowds starting to form near @MitchOFarrell office as another day of #EchoParkLake demonstrations gets under way
LAPD already drove up with the speaker truck suggesting they might threaten a dispersal order.
Some protesters now refusing to get out of the way of LAPD speaker truck, which pulled into an alley behind O’Farrell’s office.
Read 4 tweets
25 Mar
Demonstrators now calling for dissipation of the protest as LAPD announced those in the park can stay another 24 hours. Meeting some resistance. #EchoParkRiseUp
Literally one minute after I tweeted this cops fired with a launcher at the skirmish line.
Resident of the encampment: “I live here and I consider tonight a victory.”and asking the group to move back from LAPD slowly.
Read 4 tweets
25 Mar
They just gave the dispersal order again. Been almost a half hour since the first one. #EchoParkRiseUp
They’re now saying 10 minutes to disperse.
It’s been an hour since the first dispersal order, @kevrector corrects me. That’s an unusually long window, at least compared to most LAPD protest windows I’ve seen given.
Read 4 tweets
25 Mar
.@LAPDHQ just shot something at the ground at close range. Almost hit me.
Stand-off near Santa Ynez #EchoPark
Things have paused at Santa Ynez. Obligatory someone playing RATM at an LA protest.
Read 5 tweets
25 Mar
Hundreds of people in #EchoParkLake as cops have blocked the street off from Sunset and out toward the 101
Some of the tents and space people are trying to protect.
LAPD line at the far edge of the park (opposite from Sunset, the 101 side.) You can hear some supportive chants of “Echo Park!” from neighbors.
Read 7 tweets
25 Mar
Seeing this gain some traction. It's wrong, or at least misleading. There is no instruction or directive that says this, per the D.A.'s office and several prosecutors I ran this by (including plenty who are no fans of D.A. Gascon.)
I asked Jon for clarification, yet to hear back. I *think* he's referring to this, from one of Gascon's special directives on the re-sentencing unit. "Accordingly, this Office will reevaluate and consider for resentencing people who have already served 15 years in prison."
Some needed context: This policy doesn't apply to "any defendant." Gascon explicitly said day one the re-sentencing unit would prioritize defendants accused of non-violent crimes. He is correct, however, that the estimated range of cases this could impact tops at 30,000.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!