2-dimensional beings live on a 2-dimensional plane. One asks: “Which way is up?” Each thinks, then points in some direction on the 2-D plane. No one comprehends 3-D. Similarly when governments or international bodies are bounded by two dimensional thinking leanmeanprocessimprovement.com/dimensional-th…
2/they live in a polarized world where everything is categorical and "meeting of the minds" is virtually impossible. The Korean War hasn't ended b/c the West/US/UNSC/Europe are so deeply polarized in their ideological two-dimensional thinking that cannot perceive DPRK's reality.
3/“A two-dimensional thinker sees the world as a polarized place. Who you are and what you believe becomes categorical. It is either one way or the other. These individuals can see facts, but truth eludes them because the facts are generally considered without context.
4/"The problem with two dimensional thinkers is that they skew, or misinterpret, facts in order force them into a two dimensional framework. As a result, they frequently have “the facts”, but do not know, or are misrepresenting, the truth…
All of this makes two dimensional
5/"thinkers less effective in problem resolution, listening and leadership. These areas of human thought require the ability to see things from differing perspectives. The “why” of a situation is just as important as the “What”, and the “why” is generally contextual in nature,
6/"not categorical…
Seeing the world from different perspectives involves tying facts to context that may be separate from your own reality. One of the best ways to accomplish this is by listening. Stephen Covey stated it nicely by saying we must “seek first to understand,
7/"then to be understood.” Understanding is a continuous process, not a categorical one.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
North Korea’s 25 March 2021 ballistic missile launch "decoded" and explained in simple English bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world…
“North Korea has claimed the missiles it launched Thursday were a "new-type tactical guided projectile", in its first statement since the test.”
2/"”The development of this weapon system is of great significance in bolstering up the military power of the country and deterring all sorts of military threats," Ri Pyong Chol, the senior leader who oversaw the test, was quoted as saying.”
Analysis by Laura Bicker, Seoul
3/"correspondent:
“The question I always get asked is why is North Korea testing now?
There's no easy answer to this. First, because they can and Pyongyang has new weapons to try out.
But the recent messages warning the United States not to cause "a stink" and that the Biden
"Our weapons are meant for protecting our motherland from the permanent U.S. nuclear threat. The U.S. has to get along with the DPRK’s nuclear status.” - Choe Son Hui usatoday.com/story/news/wor…
[From 17 Nov 2017]
2/“Despite repeated threats to incinerate the United States with its nuclear weapons, North Korea takes pains to note it won't strike first.
The over-the-top rhetoric is often misinterpreted in the West, but North Korea has been consistent in saying it is developing a nuclear
3/"arsenal solely to ward off a first-strike by the U.S. military, said Van Jackson, an analyst at the Center for Strategic Studies at Victoria University in Wellington, New Zealand…
On Oct. 20, Choe Son Hui, who heads the North Korean Foreign Ministry’s North American
U.S. No-First-Use Policy still allows DC to make China, Russia or DPRK targets of U.S. nuclear weapons. How then should they deter the U.S. from launching nukes at them?🤔
2/“Under current policy, the United States will not use nuclear weapons against the vast majority of the world's countries in any circumstances…However, China, Russia, and North Korea do not fall under the US negative security assurance. China and Russia are nuclear weapon
3/"states under the NPT, and North Korea withdrew from the treaty in 2003 and conducted its first nuclear test in 2006.
This means that they could be targets for US nuclear weapons, including the United States launching weapons at them first.”
A North Korean school of rock: teaching heavy metal to Pyongyang school girls
Funky Sueyoshi reflects on his time at the June 9th school — and whether music could ever inspire change in the DPRK
[Oliver Jia 8 Jan 2020] nknews.org/2020/01/how-a-…
2/“This is the first ROCK SONG in North Korea that is recorded in 2007 PyongYang.” - F. Sueyoshi
北朝鮮初のオリジナルロック曲「Murumpyo (Question mark)」
3/In contrast to S Korean K-pop or Japanese idol culture, DPRK doesn't have a capitalist-driven music industry that creates pop culture idols/icons and fills corporate coffers. DPRK is just hip & down-to-earth having music students learn rock music from Japanese hipster Funky S..
A Japanese girl group member dating male idols shocks the Japanese nation, resulting in disbelief amongst her South Korean fans. So Japanese idols, who are groomed to be money-making machines, aren’t supposed to date one another, i.e. live their own lives? koreaboo.com/news/nmb48-yok…
2/So then DPRK’s critique of K-pop must have merit b/c of the similarity b/t Japanese idol and K-pop cultures.
North Korea blasts K-pop industry as 'slave-like exploitation' amid crackdown on foreign media amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/03/17…
“The piece on North Korea's Arirang Meari site
3/“claimed K-pop artists were "bound to unbelievably unfair contracts from an early age, detained at their training and treated as slaves after being robbed of their body, mind and soul by the heads of vicious and corrupt art-related conglomerates."”
BIDEN’S FIRST NEWS CONFERENCE
“President Joe Biden said Thursday that North Korea is the top foreign policy issue facing the United States.” politico.com/news/2021/03/2…
“He warned that there will be “responses” if North Korea escalates, but signaled he was open to diplomacy.
2/"We will respond accordingly,” Biden said Thursday.
“But I'm also prepared for some form of diplomacy, but it has to be conditioned upon the end result of denuclearization.””
Squaring Biden’s North Korea Policy with Choe Son Hui’s Remarks
3/"We have already declared our stand that no DPRK-U.S. contact and dialogue of any kind can be possible unless the U.S. rolls back its hostile policy towards the DPRK. Therefore, we will disregard such an attempt of the U.S. in the future, too.”