$TRMR
Issues notice for EGM on 30 Apr. Shareholders asked to
- amend Articles of Association to allow for and adopt new director to enable $TRMR to comply with SEC requirements, and
- allow $TRMR to issue 15% of share capital and asking shareholders to waive pre-emption rights
2/ Also includes no. of ExCo renumeration amendments including "entitlement to a special IPO bonus" of $500k each to CEO, CFO and CCO on successful completion of US Dual Listing.
3/ Resolution no 11 - ala waiver of pre-emption rights - $TRMR states
"there may be occasions, however, when the directors need the flexibility to finance business opportunities by the issue of shares for cash without a pre-emptive offer to existing shareholders, such as in..
4/
..the case of the proposed US Dual Listing"
The 15% additional share capital issue - represents c£142m ( based on yesterday GBp 708p close) or c$181m. In addition, my calcs show that $TRMR is sitting on c 5.56m of shares in treasury (all shares bought back to date)
5/ New shares + potential sale of shares held in treasury could raise c£181m (based on GBP 7.08 closing price yesterday) or c$250m. Thats a v decent float in US.
Questions: 1. Will they issue the ADS at a premium? 2. What will they use this additional $250m for?
6/ Sounds like $TRMR is looking at an acquisition coming. No reason to just raise cash otherwise.
Question then is - what are $TRMR planning to buy? $250m is not much for a pure cash funded acquisition so assume any acquisition will be part-cash part-stock?
7/ Fun times! My high exposure to $TRMR has helped at least partially weather the recent mkt declines
I expect the dual listing to materialise around May - assuming a 4-8 week turnaround for SEC and considering $TRMR are probably roadshowing US investors already
A lot more goes into generating top line growth. For the foreseeable future at least, I expect $SKLZ's growth spend to quite clearly overshadow immediate revenue growth.
This needs to be factored into any analysis.
3/ In other words, we are not going to see immediate substantial revenue growth here - rev growth is more likely to be lumpy than big qoq growth in most other SaaS biz. $SKLZ is not one of those.
Yes $SKLZ is reliant on a few too games - as is $SE and they have milked it so far.
2/ From Fitch's Oct'20 report:
- 40% mkt share in largest segment (sports data & content-related services)
- Well placed as largest player to outpace mkt growth, with 29% avg org rev growth between 2014-19
3/ - Positive sector trends (eg online betting growth with 24hr betting options, e-sports and simulation sports gambling) = more data points for Sportradar to sell on the pre-game and live data markets.
@BabyYodaCapital's thread on $CRTO is v interesting. This one really got me thinking. There is certainly an argument for RV here - meaning $CRTO has lot of upside on pure fundamentals alone Vs the likes of $MGNI and $TTD
But I believe there is a bigger picture here. Bear with me
Let's face it. $CRTO's shift away from retargeting into the 'New Solutions' segment is driven by a need to survive due to the 3rd party cookie issue....
..but I agree that $CRTO's strong relationship with its retail clients has helped it gain access to a potential goldmine - i.e. client 1st party data esp. ecomm.
As a standalone entity, if management are able to execute on this transformation, $CRTO will do amazingly well.