1. I watched #Seaspiracy on Netflix last night. It’s a brilliant expose of the greatest threat to marine life: fishing.
This thread explores why we have so seldom heard the the truth about what’s happening to our oceans.
#TellTheTruth
@GretaThunberg
netflix.com/gb/title/81014…
2. The BBC and other broadcasters have repeatedly failed to tell the truth. Blue Planet II was a massive exercise in misdirection. It misled us about the main reasons for ecological collapse, emphasising entirely trivial issues like plastic straws instead
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
3. I don’t believe it set out to deceive us. But Blue Planet II was typical of the BBC’s cowardice and wilful ignorance when it comes to environmental destruction. Almost reflexively, it avoids conflict with powerful economic interests.
4. This cowardice is assisted by the big conservation groups, which fail dismally to tell the truth. The inability of @MSCecolabel, @earthisland @PlasticPollutes and @Oceana to engage with the issues raised by Seaspiracy was chilling. They should hang their heads in shame.
5. These conservation groups seemed not to be restraining the mass destruction of ocean life, but *collaborating* in it. Why? Again, I believe, it’s not malice, but extreme cowardice, self-interest and self-preservation.
Result? Don’t trust the labels.
6. For years, the message almost everywhere has been “we must work with industry to find solutions”. But what if the industry is structurally committed to ecocide? What if its business model is looting? If so, we shouldn’t work with it, but work to close it down.
7. But the very institutions that should be exposing and contesting the destruction of life on Earth – the media, the conservation groups, governments – instead assist it. They don’t want to rock the boat. They are craven and deferential.
8. Those of us who try to bring these issues to light have the door slammed in our faces. For 30 years, I submitted proposals to the BBC seeking to tell the real stories. They were all angrily dismissed by channel controllers, often with a tirade of foul language.
9. And the rest of us? We retreat into wilful impotence. The campaigns against plastic straws and cotton buds that people enthuse about aren’t JUST pathetic micro-consumerist-bollocks responses to massive structural problems. *They are a form of reactive denial*.
10. They allow us to say: “look, we’re doing something, we can live with ourselves”, even while somewhere in the back of our minds we know that, by eating prawns and salmon and tuna, we are devastating the living world. “We’re good people really, aren’t we?”.
11. Well, we might be good people, but we are doing bad things. Campaigns against plastic straws and cotton buds don’t stop us from doing them: THEY HELP US TO DO THEM. They allow us to keep trashing the living world, while remaining at uneasy peace with ourselves.
12. We have to start being honest and brave and true to our good natures. That’s the only way we can stop mass destruction. And I’m sorry, but there’s no way around it: this means confronting power.
13. Support @seashepherd and @Greenpeace. Build movements against industrial fishing, not plastic straws. Demand massive and meaningful marine reserves.
Tell the truth.
And stop eating fish.
Thank you.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Monbiot

George Monbiot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgeMonbiot

17 Mar
At last! A crucial, missing piece of the climate jigsaw. For some time, I've been speculating that trawling is likely to release significant amounts of carbon from the seabed. But there was no data. Now there is, and it's even worse than I imagined.
time.com/5947430/bottom…
It was a remarkable gap in the science, and I find it surprising that no one has sought to fill it until now. Sometimes, even the biggest questions don't get asked.
It's yet another powerful argument against trawling. To protect habitats and wildlife, we urgently need to exclude this horrendously destructive practice from most of our seas. Now we know it imposes a major carbon cost as well.
Read 4 tweets
11 Mar
1. I will lose friends over this thread. But I feel it would be dishonest not to say what follows.
It seems to me that we need to distinguish between two different issues, that are often confused:

A. Whether the UK is better off in the EU.

B. Whether the EU is a good thing.
2. The answer to A, as we’re discovering the hard way, is clearly Yes.

I’ve gradually come to believe that the answer to B is No.
3. If we take the field I know best, the EU has some good environmental rules. But its overall impact on the living world is catastrophic. This is just the latest of its many assaults: subsidised piracy, that has so far resisted all attempts at redress theguardian.com/environment/20…
Read 12 tweets
5 Mar
Please remember, as corrupt Covid contracts hit the headlines again, that it the BBC didn't mention the issue for *a full 5 months* after the Good Law Project and others exposed it. Except on a few rare occasions, it has marginalised the story ever since.
This is arguably the biggest corruption scandal of modern times. Yet the BBC has flunked repeated opportunities to give it the attention it deserves.
Sometimes I feel our national broadcaster does more to suppress the news than to reveal it.
Those of us with much smaller resources than the BBC has at its disposal - openDemocracy, the Guardian, Byline Times - were able to give this issue the coverage it deserved. So it's not a question of capacity. It's a question of will.
Read 4 tweets
5 Mar
If there is one crucial environmental metric, it's the amount of land we use to produce our food.
Farming is the greatest cause of loss of terrestrial habitats and biodiversity. Livestock farming - because it needs so much land - is the major driver.
ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets
This is also the environmental issue most obscured by myth-making, wishful thinking and junk science. A lot of people really don't want to know that the meat and dairy they eat is devastating the planet. The industry feeds us reassuring falsehoods.
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1145314…
We know that air is important.
We know that water is important.
But for some reason we overlook the other crucial element: land.
The more of it we take for farming, the less of it there is for the rest of the living world.
Read 14 tweets
3 Mar
1. We’ve all had a glimpse of mortality in this pandemic, and a premonition, while housebound by lockdown, of old age. These warnings remind us to use life well. In the words of the immortal Bard (Eminem), you only get one shot. So let’s not allow our lives to be ruled by lies.
2. I don’t mean only the lies we are told, though there are plenty of them, but also the lies we tell ourselves: the false assurances that might get us through the day, but that prevent us from connecting with what is real and worthwhile.
3. Let’s begin by admitting that we are in a bad place. A very bad place. Climate and ecological breakdown are happening at terrifying speed. Our own mortality is shadowed by a much greater one: the closure of the conditions that support life on Earth.
Read 17 tweets
1 Mar
1. Why do we collaborate in our own destruction? One of the answers, I think, is our determined commitment to irrelevance. We face massive, unprecedented challenges, but when you tune in to the most popular radio shows, you hear people talking all day about … nothing.
2. As climate and ecological breakdown happen at stupendous speed and scale, as democracy is hollowed out, as a handful of oligarchs accumulate massive economic and political power, we ensure that our heads are filled with meaningless noise.
3. If alien spaceships started incinerating our cities, and we turned on the radio, we'd be told “so the hot topic today is: what’s the funniest thing that’s ever happened to you while eating a kebab?”.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!