Well, it’s Friday so that can mean only one thing: The Supreme Court is thinking about abortion again.
This time it’s not just one case they’re thinking about. It’s TWO!
The first case should be familiar to y’all by now. It involves a 15-week abortion ban out of Mississippi, and the Court has considered taking this case EIGHT TIMES SO FAR but hasn’t yet.
As @AngryBlackLady points out in her latest column we can’t figure out what on Earth the Court is thinking about because a 15-week abortion ban is flat out unconstitutional.
In addition to the Mississippi case, the Court is ALSO thinking about taking up a case out of Kentucky. Because you know. Why not.
This case is weird because it doesn’t involve abortion DIRECTLY but instead is all about the power of the state attorney general to enforce abortion laws all on their own. So this is a case all about political power.
You see, the Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron is a Republican with political ambitions, and figures being extremely anti-abortion is his ticket to success. This case fits his ambition.
Back in 2018 Kentucky lawmakers passed a ban on the most common form of later abortion. Both the lower court and the 6th Circuit took a look at the ban and said, “nope, that mess is unconstitutional.”
Lawmakers took a look at those decisions and decided to give up defending the law. Except for AG Cameron, who wants to take this case all by himself to the Supreme Court. And now SCOTUS is thinking about if he can.
When will SCOTUS decide what it’s doing with these cases? WHO KNOWS, but we could find out as early as Monday!
As always #TeamLegal’s @Hegemommy and @AngryBlackLady will be all over the news, no matter what the Court decides. So stay tuned for more. And really SCOTUS. What is there to think about?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
U.S. Catholic bishops are meeting for their annual spring conference, and one of the things they’re discussing is whether Catholic politicians who support abortion rights—like @POTUS—should be denied Communion. #USCCB21
THREAD:
But the majority of U.S. Catholics believe abortion should be legal, as @jamielmanson, president of @Catholic4Choice, told us a couple months ago.
“The way the bishops make it this polarizing issue just is not a reflection of the reality on the ground.” rewirenews.link/3voqgY8
U.S. bishops have been divided for quite some time on how to deal with prominent Catholics who support abortion access.
For the right wing, this issue became even more urgent once Joe Biden came into office.
It’s happening! @Hegemommy and @AngryBlackLady are at @Smashitbreakrm as we speak, to (literally!) take a hammer to some of the worst anti-abortion legislation we've seen.
Tune in right now, by clicking the YouTube livestream link below!
“Hello, everyone! And WELCOME to today’s very exciting event for Rewire News Group! I’m @Hegemommy, the SVP and Executive Editor of Rewire News Group—and co-host of our legal podcast, Boom! Lawyered.”
"A couple of weeks ago we asked you, our loyal listeners, readers, and fans, to rank some pretty awful anti-choice legislation and some cringe-worthy quotes from anti-choice lawmakers. We’ve now taken all of that harmful nonsense and put it on items—like this one!" 🔨
Today’s the anniversary of the Supreme Court guaranteeing the right to use birth control—but only for married couples.
Here’s a closer look at the 1965 landmark ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut.
THREAD:
At the time, Connecticut banned the use of contraceptives. So when Estelle Griswold, the head of Planned Parenthood in Connecticut, opened a birth control clinic with the help of a Yale med school doctor, they were arrested and convicted of violating the law.
But this was their plan all along!
You see, they wanted to use the clinic to challenge the draconian law under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution by arguing that banning birth control violated the privacy rights of married couples.
It's a hostile time right now for reproductive rights, but there are some members of Congress trying to help.
Join us on Instagram Live (@RewireNewsGroup) with Executive Editor @Hegemommy and Assistant Speaker @RepKClark for this important conversation—happening in 30 minutes
We're now live on Instagram and joined by @RepKClark
"Reproductive rights are human rights." - @RepKClark
Last week a federal court delivered a swift blow to anti-abortion protesters in New York who argued that the FACE Act, which protects clinic workers and patients from violent protesters, violated their First Amendment rights.
What’s the FACE Act? We’re glad you asked!
THREAD:
The FACE Act—the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrance Act—is a federal law designed to protect access to abortion clinics.
It was signed into law in 1994 after a whole bunch of clinic violence. It prohibits the use of physical force or obstruction to interfere with anyone trying to access reproductive health services.
I'm @ja_davids taking over @RewireNewsGroup today to talk about endometriosis and infertility. I'm a health journalist and the co-founder of @endowarriors, which provides education and support to people with endo. I'm also writing a book about family planning.
I'm also the author of the upcoming So When Are You Having Kids, which will delve into everything you need to know about if, when, and how to become a parent.
I was diagnosed with endometriosis when I was 12. Growing up, I knew infertility was a possibility, but I thought IVF was foolproof so I didn't worry too much. When I was 24, I was diagnosed with premature ovarian failure, which doctors suspect came from having 7 endo surgeries.