Yesterday, GA adopted a massive overhaul of elections that raises a number of potential concerns. Below is a copy of the full bill thanks to @stphnfwlr as well as some of my more extensive thoughts on it. documentcloud.org/documents/2052…
1/The bill removes the Secretary of State as the State Electoral Board chair. What message does it send if an election official who upholds the integrity of his state's elections is rewarded with death threats, a primary opponent who supports the big lie, and a bill like this?
2/The bill prohibits mobile voting except for emergencies. Why? While mobile voting is great for emergencies, it's also a great, secure option for early voting and takes pressure off of election day. I saw this firsthand when I worked for @AdaElections.
3/It makes dropboxes a permanent fixture in GA elections, which is a good thing, but it doesn't call for enough of them. Having one for every 15,000-20,000 voters is consistent with best practices. eac.gov/sites/default/…
4/It smartly allows election officials to process absentee ballots sooner, but it also requires counting ballots nonstop once polls close, which could impact the accuracy of vote counting if workers get too tired. Election officials may need to recruit more workers in response.
5/It appears to give state legislators greater ability to intervene in the administration of local elections, regardless of how an election is actually conducted. It's hard to see how this further fosters impartial election administration.
6/As @grace_panetta notes, voters now need to submit a driver's license/ID number to apply for a ballot and 1 of those numbers or the last 4 digits of their SSN on the ballot envelope, rather than a signature. Is there actual evidence that GA signature matching was problematic?
7/The recent Cobb County audit went well, and if there are minor issues or one-offs, that would seem to support tweaks to the procedures for verifying signatures and/or notifying voters about a mismatch, rather than a wholesale change to the process.
8/The bill essentially includes a ban on private funding for elections, which would be fine if there was a guarantee that governments could adequately fund elections, but as we know from #election2020, no such guarantee exists.
9/Instead it was private monies that helped ensure that many election officials could administer #election2020 as successfully as they did. If there was rampant misuse of private funds, that could potentially justify this action, but no such evidence has been unearthed to date.
10/And making it a misdemeanor for merely giving food and water to voters waiting in line is beyond the pale. Its bad enough when voters have to wait in hours-long lines. This adds insult to injury.
11/It is important to note that there are some good provisions in this bill. For example, early voting will now be expanded in many places and the deadline for requesting absentee ballots now aligns with guidance from the USPS.
12/Unfortunately, the justification for too many provisions in this bill is flimsy at best, resting on some combination of mis- and/or disinformation. That's never a good basis for making any decisions, let alone changes to election processes.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Levine

David Levine Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @davidalanlevine

28 Mar
1/Agreed. It's hard to overstate the significance of the GA provisions that enable state legislators to interfere in the administration of the elections. While some pundits may tell you that the final product wasn't as bad as it could have been, that's frankly little consolation.
2/Don't agree with me? Ask other current or former local election administrators & see what they think if they were subject to these same or similar provisions. I'm a former one and I can't see how such provisions help foster better, non-partisan administration of our elections.
3/Election officials largely did a great job conducting #election2020, often with limited resources. Going forward, they will need more resources to meet the evolving risks to their election systems and ensure that future elections are secure as well.
Read 4 tweets
16 Dec 20
1/This is another good reminder that securing the election infrastructure doesn't just entail protecting cyber assets like voter registration systems, electronic pollbooks, election night reporting systems, etc.
2/It includes protecting those who run our elections, like state and local election officials, information technology staff, poll workers, and vendor support staff. securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/david-levine-i…
3/As well as physical assets, such as voting equipment, storage facilities, ballot processing facilities,
voting locations, and ballots. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…
Read 7 tweets
16 Dec 20
1/To help overcome significant partisan divisions over the legitimacy of #Election2020, like those on display at today's hearing, President-Elect Biden should establish by executive order a Presidential Commission on Election Security (PCES).
2/The PCES would identify best practices in election integrity and make recommendations to help ensure trustworthy future elections.
3/Like President Obama's 2013 Presidential Commission on Election Administration, it would have true bipartisan leadership. It should include election administrators, media experts, and leaders across the political spectrum with experience in both the public and private sectors.
Read 4 tweets
15 Dec 20
Tomorrow, the United Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Government Affairs will holding a hearing entitled," Examining Irregularities in the 2020 Election", and a few points are worth making in advance of the hearing. hsgac.senate.gov/examining-irre…
1/ While the witness list includes @C_C_Krebs and @VotingGuy, both of whom played important roles in helping secure #election2020, it includes no others who serve on the front lines of elections, such as state and local election officials, vendors, and other federal partners.
2/Any unverified claims of election irregularities should be viewed with a healthy dose of skepticism. Look no further than the recent committee hearings held in the Georgia General Assembly for affirmation of this principle. gpb.org/news/2020/12/1…
Read 7 tweets
1 Jun 20
1/ On the eve of June 2nd primary elections in the District of Columbia, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Montana, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and South Carolina, I'll be looking out for a number of things, including:
2/ In-person voting. Because of the health risks inherent to in-person voting—which often requires standing in crowded lines and touching shared surfaces—there will likely be less of it than usual, but it still must be safe for pollworkers and voters. #Elections2020
3/The expected surge in #VoteByMail (VBM). While VBM can minimize person to person contact and reduce spread of the virus, successful VBM elections are highly dependent on secure and accurate voter registration databases.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!