1/ Sometimes I write an article that manages to obscure the main points. It happened today, when @SeekingAlpha published my latest collaboration with MaxedOutMama. Here, I'll explain how the conclusion should have read. Here's a link to the article.

seekingalpha.com/article/441626…
2/ The key point I should have stressed is that $TSLA's return on investment in China is going to be far more modest than its fans (& analysts, & the biz media, but I repeat myself) believe. Indeed, China may become a capital drain. Why? Several reasons:
3/ First, China's NEV Plan requires sharing, collaboration, and standardization (of battery swapping, charging infrastructure, etc) that will remove some of Tesla's key advantages.
4/ Second, the luxury end of the Chinese EV market is now intensely competitive. Any further market share gains by Tesla will have to come in inexpensive cars along the lines of the Wuling Mini. Of which Tesla now has exactly none. Gucci needs to transform itself into Costco.
5/ Third, Starlink may have made Tesla radioactive to the Chinese. Not untouchable, but less lovable.
6/ Fourth, Tesla's FSD difficulties mean it needs to spend a lot more, rapidly, on making FSD real (which may not be possible, but it has to try). The brilliant video now circulating, which Tesla cultists are so eager to ban, reflects growing discontent with hollow promises...
7/ ... but in China, Tesla may have to have a separate FSD system, the one China is pushing hard to develop, which is consonant with its Surveillance State plans. Two entirely separate FSD systems mean extra cost.
8/ To meet its annual revenue requirements under the Grant Contract, Tesla will need lots of Shanghai exports by 2023. The NEV Plan all but assures that Tesla will need to be building two significantly different Shanghai variants for each model, one for domestic & one for export.
9/ Meanwhile, Tesla is beginning to invest in India. It needs to do that to create a separate, cheap supply chain. That investment will require billions, with a very, very long timeframe before any ROI can be expected.
10/ All this on top of the real, but unquantifiable, risks that the growing tensions between China and much of the West now pose.
11/ So, my apologies to MaxedOutMama. Her research was, as always, spot on. But this time, I made a botch of putting it all together.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Montana Skeptic

Montana Skeptic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @montana_skeptic

17 Mar
1/ Allow me a thread on this German $tsla & @elonmusk documentary. First, thank you, @russ1mitchell, for calling it to our attention. And, yes, it is well done, and it was heartening to see @CristinaIBalan have an opportunity to tell a small part of her story.
2/ One hesitates to quibble at a production so fine, but there are some serious shortcomings that should be mentioned...
3/ ...For instance, the idea that Musk was responsible for the success of PayPal is nonsense, and has been amply debunked by many, most especially by @Tweetermeyer in his superb book, Ludicrous. Still the best book out there about both Musk and Tesla. amazon.com/Ludicrous-Unva…
Read 16 tweets
26 Feb
1/ Cathie was one of the two $tsla bulls on a “Tesla debate“ panel at the 2018 Robinhood Conference (no, not that Robin Hood). Gordon Johnson & I were the bears. Looking Cathie in the eye on that occasion, I couldn’t decide whether she was crazy or merely cynical.
2/ At the time, I thought Cathie’s Tesla target price of $4000 per share was insane. How wrong I was. Her target was not insane. The market was insane.
3/ But ask yourself: Who benefited from this insanity? Who fed it? With what motives? With what absurd projections and models? With what endless cynicism?
Read 6 tweets
21 Jan
1/ The analysts think $TSLA will sell some 820k (+ or - 50k) cars in 2021, with more than 80% of the growth coming in China. MaxedOutMama & I say otherwise:

seekingalpha.com/article/440024…
2/ Much of this article is the summation of a data-dense, fact-intensive blog post by MaxedOutMama. It's another superb piece of work by her. In a just world, she would have more followers than I do.

seekingalpha.com/instablog/4860…
3/ There's also some detail about an intriguing new lawsuit alleging serious misbehavior by $TSLA regarding OTA updates to disguise battery degradation & evade warranty obligations. Thanks to @PlainSite for making the federal court complaint readily available.
Read 4 tweets
7 Jan
1/ The last time Elon Musk faced a defamation claim, he richly deserved to lose. He smeared a true hero, Vernon Unsworth, calling him a pedophile. Some might suspect projection on Musk's part...
2/ Unfortunately, Unsworth hired L. Lin Wood (I'm now blocked by Wood, but his Twitter handle is @LLinWood).

The choice was not illogical. Wood had settled many high-profile defamation cases, though it appeared he tried few, if any.
3/ Wood's work in pretrial briefing and discovery was impressive. He survived various efforts to dismiss the case, and developed a powerful body of evidence for trial.
Read 17 tweets
2 Oct 20
1/ Short thread on production & deliveries.

First, production. According to Tesla on 7/22/20, its quarterly capacity is now somewhere between 172,500 & 197,500. Image
2/ However, in no quarter this year has Tesla achieved even the low end of capacity.

Q3 is best so far, at between 84% and 73% of capacity, depending upon whether Tesla has, as it stated in its July 22 update, extended Fremont 3/Y capacity to 500k.
3/ Now, deliveries. Having guided to 500k for 2020, Tesla in Q3 achieved a delivery number exceeding the 125k/quarter needed.

However, the Q3 delivery number amounts to between 81% and 71% of installed capacity, again depending on whether Fremont is now at 500k 3/Y.
Read 21 tweets
22 Sep 20
1/ I'm advised that DOE was experimenting with tab-less batteries back in 2011. There may well be a reason why no one uses them. h/t @TeeKay_EV

Battery Day
2/ See page 3, point 3. You need to put these two together, as Twitter blocks the whole link:

nrel.gov/transportation

/assets/pdfs/50248.pdf
3/ or, let's try this:

https:

//www.nrel.gov/transportation/assets/

assets/pdfs/50248.pdf
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!