The western aggression has unleashed China's nuclear power. It's psychological, ie, the righteous anger and rage of the Chinese people. The H&M's declaration of boycott of Xinjiang cotton dates back to last year. The company may have forgotten about it itself.
2/H&M doesn't source its cotton from Xinjiang anyway. Such cotton is too expensive. H&M's calculation was simple. The boycott was a PR move for its western image, assuming the majority is buying into the western Uighur atrocity propaganda.
3/However, a Chinese netizen dug out the H&M statement online and given the current Sino-European relationship, it immediately became a meme. Apparently, it has something to do with H&M being European and Swedish. War against H&M is a spontaneous democratic people's war.
4/This Chinese netizen (or vicious competitor 😃) must have studied the NED color revolution handbook.
Chinese people's opinion of an European company matters. It's difficult
to do business in China against Chinese people's goodwill.
5/Especially given that it is extraordinarily easy to find out
whether China uses Uighur slave labor or not, H&M's faux pas is unforgivable. Satellite should be able to capture images of hundreds and thousands of slave labor picking cotton.
6/ However the ASPI satellite has an anti-China filter. It always misses authentic happenings in Xinjiang, and in particular, the large scale mechanized automated cotton harvesting in Xinjiang.
7/Xinjiang Uighur slave labor is a grotesque western propaganda. H&M openly endorses and promotes such a lie all the while hoping to have its business intact on the China market. No wonder it has aroused the ire of the Chinese people.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
An understanding of the Myanmar situation: the West is responsible for the coup and the destruction of the Myanmar democracy according to Philippines' foreign minister Teodoro Locsin
Aung San Suu Kyi was punished for not wanting to be a western puppet.
2/She promoted actively Myanmar's cooperation with China and embraced China's Belt Road Initiative. She visited China several times and has excellent personal relationship with Chinese leaders.
The disappointed West thus turned against her and condemned her for the
3/alleged genocide of the Rohingya Muslims (in reality racial conflict as a result of British colonial legacy).
The military misjudged the situation deeming it an opportune moment to seize the power. The Junta considered to have received encouraging signals from the West with
NGOs are directing Myanmar protesters's rage against China hoping to kill two birds with one stone, destabilizing both countries & destroying the cooperation between the two
Now as a rule, all situation of turmoil in
2/ a neighboring country is used as a proxy war against China. Thanks to the relentless anti-China propaganda on Myanmar's social media, the protesters now believe China is behind the military junta and is responsible for the coup. As a result, Chinese factories are assaulted.
3/ Military junta is authoritarian, so China, as an "autocracy" must automatically back the junta. The reality is otherwise. China has remained neutral and hasn't sought to interfere in the internal affairs of Myanmar. The hitherto martyr of democracy Aung San Suit Kyi .
2/Nope. This is considered to be a threat to the West because China is gaining huge soft power.
West can't provide vaccines to poor countries itself and at the same time it is attacking China and Russia for so-called "vaccine diplomacy". This seems to be an abominable behavior.
3/In order to appease the West, the poor countries have to make a public statement: "It's not about politics. It's about saving lives". As if this is not self evident. This situation is grotesque. It only shows West can't care less about human lives.
America seems to be very vulnerable to natural disasters. US can't cope with the Pandemic. A winter storm is enough to plunge Texas into stone age. Thousands of Mississippi residents have been deprived of water for two
2/weeks and the water crisis is still ongoing. In these circumstances, maybe the biggest US national security threat is not China but the US itself?
China has been faced with similar disasters, notably Covid, flood and power crisis in the past year.
3/But China managed to cope with the situations with competent national coordination, reducing the damage to the minimum. Such a level of governance seems to be impossible to be achieved in the USA. Capitalism functions more like a failed state these days.
In the end, the US chip/tech ban to China is hurting the US.
Car makers like GM and Ford can't procure chips on the market. As a result they must drastically reduce their car output.
China's car factories are less impacted because seeing the chip ban coming,
2/ they prepared their chip stockpile.
China's mid/low end chipset manufacturers can't make chips because of difficulties to procure lithography machines and other upstream tech indispensables as a result of the US tech ban.
As every object and household appliance nowadays
3/ is endowed with AI, the needs for mid/low end chips has exploded worldwide. US having rendered impossible for China to produce such chips, companies have no other option but to buy from Samsung and Taiwan's TSMC. These two companies can't cater to the worldwide chip needs
A world dominated by BBC Propaganda is a world of war, chaos and hatred.
China's efforts to pull villagers out of poverty in Xinjiang Uighur region involved providing employment opportunities. Providing jobs is not slave labor.
2/France has equivalent programs, like "Contrat Emploi Aidé", ie, gouvernement subsidized jobs.
This John Sudworth of BBC is a veteran professional liar on China. He did the notorious BBC documentary "The Road Back to Wuhan" in which he presented an anti-terrorism
3/live exercise as police brutality in real life. Later when the Chinese government protested, he said his video source (misappropiated from the official account of a local police station) didn't say it was anti-terrorism live exercise. Upon opening his video source, we see that