Manchin focused on his personal opinion about importance of 2A minority rights not held by majority of Americans & minority rights of smaller population states many GOP & rights of minorities in his state who hold views like his 2A views contrary to majority in his state let...
...alone majority of Americans’ views in every state contrary to his own like approval of universal background checks & red flag laws has a right to go “scorched earth” along with McConnell & GOP to protect his minority views but is he willing to kill voting rights to protect 2A?
Kill voting rights (let GOP kill them with 253 bills and counting bills in individual states) just to protect a 2A“slippery slope” that does not exist. Background checks are not guns any more than large capacity magazines are guns. 50 or 100 round clips convenient for those ...
... too lazy to reload but also convenient way way way too convenient for mass murderers like Los Vegas shooter who killed 50 and wounded 500 not just with multiple weapons with high capacity but with bump stocks. Conscience HAS to win out over convenience. Manchin’s personal ...
... opinions may be lauded by some (maybe many) as somehow “principled” but his challenge is to recognize the wrongness of going too far to protect 2A & especially states’ rights when so many GOP states are taking away voting rights a real “slippery slope” when it’s easier to...
... get a gun than it is to vote. Background checks where allowed have stopped thousands of criminals from getting guns. Voter suppression efforts have prevented hundreds of thousands from voting without catching hand full of voter frauds out of hundreds of millions so rare as...
... to be almost non - existent.

How many voters have had their votes taken away? Many.

How many ( law abiding ) gun owners have had or ever will have their guns taken away! Zero. At least I know if none.

Kemp who just signed voter suppression bill disallowed hundreds of ...
... thousands of votes to beat Stacy Abrams by 50,000 votes. Kemp & GA GOP lost both Senate seats despite massive voter suppression efforts & 8 hour lines to to vote. Manchin not supporting whatever it takes to pass voting rights bill in Senate doesn’t hold water. Is Manchin ...
... working against his own constituents if he doesn’t work to pass Biden agenda! Yes, when it comes to protecting voter rights now under attack. If someone stands in line 8 hours in WV & is given water it’s not a felony as it is in GA - yet. But Manchin’s on a “slippery slope.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ken Hollar

Ken Hollar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hollar_ken

28 Mar
@johnlundin Reportedly McConnell bragged he told Obama to his face he’d never get a SC nominee & followed through refusing to bring Obama ‘s SC nominee Garland up even for discussion as required by Constitution Senate duty to advise & consent (or not). Filibuster NOT even in Constitution.
@johnlundin McConnell saying he will obstruct is entirely disingenuous because that’s all he’s done holding 100s of dem bills on his desk not bringing up even for discussion relishing “grim reaper” nickname quite literal with bipartisan Covid relief on his desk bill May to Dec 2020 ...
@johnlundin ... while almost 60,000 a day were forced into poverty and lines at food banks stretched to miles. How many lives could have been saved if McConnell had brought up universal background checks approved of by 90% of Americans including a majority of republicans. McConnell ...
Read 19 tweets
28 Mar
Put upcoming Biden three trillion dollar infrastructure bill in context with trillions Fed used (printing $ trillions put right on deficit) artificially propping up stocks good for those with stocks, 401ks, even pensions but for half country w/o nada who nevertheless pay for ...
... roads. Set aside value of all the jobs created by infrastructure work (work unemployed need) just look at 1940-1961 when highest tax rate over 90% & not so many richest paid zero in taxes let alone complained about using $ to pay for Eisenhower interstate highway system ...
... with bridges now crumbling through neglect and unions were growing partners not enemies of companies closing income gap growing middle class away from just rich and poor. What happened to us? Now income gap increasing and middle class being forced into poverty through no ...
Read 7 tweets
27 Sep 20
@Bodhi66 @BerniceKing @soccermom1517 Respectfully, “in God we trust” did not appear on U.S. paper money until 1957 when Eisenhower signed it into law. It was NOT part of Constitution or “centuries,” of American life afterwards. I don’t know why he did it or if he would regret it now. Eisenhower in memoirs did ...
@Bodhi66 @BerniceKing @soccermom1517 ... regret making a campaign stop for commie fear mongering Joseph McCarthy who ruined many people’s lives. Eisenhower knew McCarthy’s fear mongering was wrong but upon the advice of political advisors played along to get along just to get a few votes - something as I said he ...
@Bodhi66 @BerniceKing @soccermom1517 ... regretted. I wonder what Eisenhower would think of Trump - someone if has regrets afraid voice them. I don’t know but I absolutely know what Lincoln would think of Trump because he made it very clear rejecting offer of Trump like “American” party “on principle” because...
Read 16 tweets
27 Sep 20
@BerniceKing @soccermom1517 I so agree.

Whatever happened to common sense one person’s rights end where another person’s begin?

1A freedom of religion means for each person individually - it was ever intended one person or one religion force their beliefs on others.

Pilgrims escaped persecution of ...
@BerniceKing @soccermom1517 ... Church of England which COULD persecute because it was part of the state.

We became independent because we did not want a king like England ( one man rule ) or any one religion forced on us ( Church of England take it or suffer consequences).

No religious declaration is...
@BerniceKing @soccermom1517 ... is required to be President or any other government official - separation of church and state. “So help me God” heard after oath sometimes is not required nor is Bible ( FDR was sworn in once without one ) -any book of beliefs may be used or no at all. “Swear” or “affirm” ...
Read 6 tweets
26 Sep 20
Coincidence Amy Barrett believes Justices’s “opinion” should trump “precedence” in cases like Roe vs Wade?

Argument for HER is w/o original thinking of Justices like her slaves not free & women wouldn’t be able to vote.

She reveals herself in her 2013 hypothetical opinion on...
... what would happen if Roe vs Wade were overturned. She said states would be “free” to ban or keep abortion. Problem is while “states” would be “free” women would no longer be “free” to decide what to do with their own bodies.

Set aside fact Federalist Society (GOP) put in ...
... judges who followed “precedence” ( following what has already been decided ) and picking Barrett so monumentally and obviously gives them a judge not following precedent just to overturn precedent of Roe vs Wade which is a goal of single issue voters voting GOP.

Barrett ...
Read 23 tweets
24 Sep 20
2018 FL passed a Constitutional amendment former felons who previously could not vote could vote. But GOP Desantis legislators being who they are passed a more restrictive version with, yes, they can vote, but not any who have outstanding court fees or costs. Here’s my ...
... question. Previous felons who paid their debts to society can still vote which is only fair.

But are non-previous felons who have outstanding court costs or fees prevented from voting?

I hope not - I’m not advocating that.

Just pointing out this targeting court costs is...
... not about collecting outstanding debts it’s simple voter suppression. It’s an illegal poll tax - the old you pay a certain amount of money or you could not vote ruled illegal.

Not only should previous felons who owe court costs be able to vote as people never convicted ...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!