A shitty day, with shitty news made by shitty governments.
At some point in living memory, it would have been possible to shrug it off, and go for a walk, stopping in at a pub for a pint or two and a smoke.
Now all -- the walk, the pub, the pint and the smoke -- are illegal.
This illustrates the fact of the 'slippery slope fallacy'.
It's not a slippery slope. It is a sheer drop.
There has been no resistance to the government's acquisition of powers.
I have argued with idiot normies from the outset. And at each turn, the claims are the same "if it can save just one life... &c &c".
It is always about 'protection' from 'risks' which are barely detectable, except through exotic statistical torturing.
And where are we? We have far fewer pubs. Everything is more expensive. And now people even fear exercise, which may bring them into contact with a virus or the law. Businesses are closing. People are losing their jobs...
Perhaps risk aversion is the most dangerous thing.
Whoever went to a pub on a Saturday afternoon because they believed it was 'safe'?
Are we better off now, in 2021, than we were in 2001, now that we are safer, and we have the government protect us from ourselves, from others and from the unseen dangers that surrounded us?
Here's the point...
It is disappointing for many of us who became adults in the 1990s, that we were only granted adult status for a few short years.
Thereafter, we were treated as children again.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's true of "systemic 'racism'" too, that people who claim it is a fact cannot identify the components or dynamics of the 'system'. Yet they are obsessed with 'systems'.
What people who demand the abolition of an (imagined) system invariably are in reality demanding is the instantiation of a system.
The EU/EC was no more democratic on 22 June 2016 than it was last night, and it gave no more of a toss about the lives of 500 million people then than it gives now.
EU vaccine policies are completely immaterial to anything whatsoever, even if they are nuts.
It's like waking up tomorrow and deciding that the CCP is bad because of its cheese policies.
Kevin Anderson is Greta's mentor -- the author of much of her bullshit, and as she was a child, partly responsible for her forming a devastatingly grim view of her future, which she then shared with countless children across the world.
Prof Iain Stewart has made some very decent TV shows in his time. But Earth: Climate Wars was not one of them. It was basically Naomi Oreskes's conspiracy theories, fronted by @Profiainstewart, in which he told a pack of porkies.
I.e., the argument that children should be given the vote treats adults like children.
It is a dangerous hollowing out of the concept of citizenship, and a transformation of the relationship between individuals and government.
You get to choose what colour you prefer.
In the green worldview, the state is the parent. It doesn't require the consent of the governed, it only requires obedience. Democratic expression is narrowed accordingly. Environmentalism has *ethics*, but not *politics* -- you don't need choice.