A shitty day, with shitty news made by shitty governments.

At some point in living memory, it would have been possible to shrug it off, and go for a walk, stopping in at a pub for a pint or two and a smoke.

Now all -- the walk, the pub, the pint and the smoke -- are illegal.
This illustrates the fact of the 'slippery slope fallacy'.

It's not a slippery slope. It is a sheer drop.

There has been no resistance to the government's acquisition of powers.
I have argued with idiot normies from the outset. And at each turn, the claims are the same "if it can save just one life... &c &c".

It is always about 'protection' from 'risks' which are barely detectable, except through exotic statistical torturing.
And where are we? We have far fewer pubs. Everything is more expensive. And now people even fear exercise, which may bring them into contact with a virus or the law. Businesses are closing. People are losing their jobs...

Perhaps risk aversion is the most dangerous thing.
Whoever went to a pub on a Saturday afternoon because they believed it was 'safe'?

Are we better off now, in 2021, than we were in 2001, now that we are safer, and we have the government protect us from ourselves, from others and from the unseen dangers that surrounded us?
Here's the point...

It is disappointing for many of us who became adults in the 1990s, that we were only granted adult status for a few short years.

Thereafter, we were treated as children again.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Pile

Ben Pile Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @clim8resistance

27 Mar
One MP wants a new "economic system".

I think it may be an iron law that people who use the word 'system' invariably do not know what a 'system' is.
It's true of "systemic 'racism'" too, that people who claim it is a fact cannot identify the components or dynamics of the 'system'. Yet they are obsessed with 'systems'.
What people who demand the abolition of an (imagined) system invariably are in reality demanding is the instantiation of a system.
Read 8 tweets
27 Mar
The technical term is 'useful idiot'.

They are the most visible campaign for the safe passage of the Bill through Parliament.
Similarly, XR demanded Net Zero and the Citizens' Assembly.

Then they found themselves rounded up in their thousands, issued summons, and their form of protest made illegal.

They had served their purpose.
Now the laws that prevented them will also be used against people protesting against what XR had demanded.

You can't demand that a government act against the will and interests of the population without provoking conflict.

So what did XR expect?
Read 7 tweets
27 Mar
"Alarming rate" unquantified.

Such is the privilege of institutional "science"... It is not required to define its terms when demanding "global action that needs to be taken".

By this sleight of hand, "science" is now politics. But you may not challenge it.
If the @royalsociety wishes to be a political body, it must answer criticism.

But it refuses to.

It should be dismantled. It has served its purpose and exceeded its founding principles and its motto.

It has become antiscience.
Bullshit.
Read 11 tweets
27 Mar
Oh, but apart from that, right...?

SMH...
The EU/EC was no more democratic on 22 June 2016 than it was last night, and it gave no more of a toss about the lives of 500 million people then than it gives now.

EU vaccine policies are completely immaterial to anything whatsoever, even if they are nuts.
It's like waking up tomorrow and deciding that the CCP is bad because of its cheese policies.
Read 4 tweets
26 Mar
The Scottish Climate Assembly's "Evidence Group" is good for a giggle.

Ideologues and liars.

climateassembly.scot/who-involved/e…
Kevin Anderson is Greta's mentor -- the author of much of her bullshit, and as she was a child, partly responsible for her forming a devastatingly grim view of her future, which she then shared with countless children across the world.
Prof Iain Stewart has made some very decent TV shows in his time. But Earth: Climate Wars was not one of them. It was basically Naomi Oreskes's conspiracy theories, fronted by @Profiainstewart, in which he told a pack of porkies.
Read 15 tweets
25 Mar
It's always greens leading the argument to give the vote to children. It seems to be a worldwide thing.

The take this position because greens don't really believe in democracy or adulthood.
I.e., the argument that children should be given the vote treats adults like children.

It is a dangerous hollowing out of the concept of citizenship, and a transformation of the relationship between individuals and government.

You get to choose what colour you prefer.
In the green worldview, the state is the parent. It doesn't require the consent of the governed, it only requires obedience. Democratic expression is narrowed accordingly. Environmentalism has *ethics*, but not *politics* -- you don't need choice.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!