I did a deep dive into this ‘substack controversy’ and the whole thing seems like nonsense to me. The claim seems to be that the people running substack are choosing some kinds of writers and not others to not only pay but give the exposure substack makes possible.
2/ This is pretty clearly nonsense. Theyre not bringing audiences to anyone. They’re paying some people to bring their audiences to them. Or considered from another angle, it’s the equivalent of giving a big advance to someone you’re very confident will produce a book that sells.
3/ Lots of platforms try to purchase buy-in to their platforms in the early days of their operation. Platforms require a critical mass of buy-in to start getting the kinds of economies of scale and a loose sort of path dependence to make everything work.
4/ These are obviously financial bets, not a crypto-editorial policy. This is one of those controversies where the language of “transparency” has been coopted to give a sheen of legitimacy to an argument that is based on some mix of ignorance abt publishing economics and ...
5/ just ambient grumbliness. A few months ago I worked a bit with a friend who was launching a newsletter on substack. Just generally advice on roll out, marketing, no financial connection of any kind. But in the course of those conversations he told me that a woman with a ...
6/ newsletter about a different topic had one of these deals. She seemed like someone who could bring an audience (albeit at a much smaller scale than some of the big names today) and they gave her one of these deals. Her project seemed to be going well. He knew this ...
7/ because I think the folks at substack told him. Or maybe it was just common knowledge. It didn’t strike either of us as in any way odd. A logical bet for the company. It’s not odd. It’s not a problem. Fwiw, I would bind my enterprise to any platform. Look at all ...
8/ the fun they’re having at Medium. But that’s just me. Substack seems to work great for a lot of folks. Not everyone is so fanatical about insulating themselves so much from the whims of someone else’s VC/tech backed business. These are really challenging time for ...
9/ journalists. I’ve seen the whole evolution over 20 years. But to survive it’s really important for journalists and writers in general to develop a basic literacy about the business of publishing. Otherwise it’s hard to make good decisions, even if all you want to do is write.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Marshall

Josh Marshall Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshtpm

29 Mar
Latest vax data suggests deliverance is at hand. But lax behavior and variants may get us a 4th wave while we're getting everyone vaccinated. Latest numbers suggests this is likely. Mortality shldnt be nearly as high. But many will sicken and die just weeks before the end.
2/ Now we have one of the first strong studies suggesting mRNA vax protects against infection not just disease. So broad vaccination should slow spread to a trickle. talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/a-big-b…
3/ But cases are starting to trend up in most of the country. And we're still under 20% of the pop fully vaccinated. Even with disease-acquired immunity in the tens of millions that still leaves a big population for COVID to run free in.
Read 4 tweets
20 Mar
As a comic relief after thought to the monarchy thread, I notice there's a controversy in the UK today about the Union Jack. Basically traditionalists who revere it and more cosmopolitan types who find it a bit much. It's comparable though not quite the same as debates ...
2/ we have about the flag in the USA. In any case, critics say the UK flag is a symbol of colonialism, racism and essentially all the historical baggage of the British Empire. Which is a lot of baggage! But for me it's basically a positive symbol. Why? Well, basically ...
3/ because for me I associate with 'Swinging 60s' culture and the way it was embraced by various UK rock acts and then later Ska and mod groups. Which is to say my association is largely post-Imperial and to extent ironic. And that's definitely not what these types are ...
Read 4 tweets
20 Mar
The British monarchy is quaint, good for streaming costume dramas and something I really don't care about in any way. But the new pro-monarchism on the US right, which seems to flow downstream from hostility to Meghan Markle, is a fascinating development. It goes without ...
2/ saying that rejection of the British monarchy is literally about as foundationally American as you can get. But it's worth stepping back and appreciating the radicalism of this stance for Americans in the final decades of the 18th century. Read the correspondence of a ...
3/ Jefferson or a Washington and they bristle with hostility not only to *the* King but the concept of kings. This seems obvious to us. After all America doesn't have kings and they rebelled against a king. But you cannot understate the degree to which the whole political ...
Read 13 tweets
19 Mar
Just started listening to the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal season of Slow Burn. The role of Bill Clinton may seem very different 20+ years on. The role of Starr and his lawyers does not. A staggeringly corrupt operation from first to last and basically every lawyer involved.
2/ The victimization of Lewinsky seemed roughly the same to me then as it does now. What stands out to me bracingly now is the almost unimaginable fortitude and strength of Lewinsky, holding her own in the face of what can only be considered an assault on her by Starr’s lawyers.
3/ One thing that stands out in this retelling is the fairly credulous attitude to ‘scandals’ like whitewater, travelgate, etc. and the reporter experts are ones who many rightly see as discredited if not disgraced by their journalistic roles in the scandals.
Read 4 tweets
19 Mar
Mark makes an key point here. But it's important to note what 'epicenter' means in this case. Part of this difference is the very high rate of testing in the NY region. But also the cases are falling everywhere. But they've more plateaued in the NYC metro region.
2/ That's bad. And it's likely, as Mark says, in large part because variants have taken hold in the region. But there's no boom in the NYC region and case race rates aren't spreading out from the NYC region. The numbers have stopped falling at the rate it is in other regions.
3/ To give some context, on 3/17 New York did over 270k tests. The comparably sized state of Florida did just under 110k tests. That makes a difference. Again, to be clear, this isn't saying Mark's wrong. He's making a really important point. Variants seem to have stopped or ...
Read 6 tweets
16 Mar
So I know everyone has a day job. And this isn't about politics. But since I have a platform I thought I'd share with you this documentary evidence of @att's pervasive use of fraud. As I noted before, my wife bought a phone from @att and returned it. They repeatedly claimed ...
2/ they never received it, though we had record of the PO pick up etc. She spent weeks on the phone with @att getting all the records. She would get it resolved only to see the fake charges appear again. When she spoke to them on Dec 26 she'd been lied to so many times she ...
3/ insisted on evidence/confirmation etc that she had proven the phone had been returned etc. Here's the transcript of that communication.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!