Here's how Jennifer Acuri claims Boris Johnson made his pass at her: he stroked her leg under the table.
Here's Shappi Khorsandi saying he did substantially the same to her.
And here's Charlotte Edwardes claiming he did the same to her "his hand is high up my leg and he has enough inner flesh beneath his fingers to make me sit suddenly upright." Ms Edwardes says the woman on the other side of Johnson suffered the same experience.
Here's Johnson effectively accusing Ms Edwardes of being a liar.
I know who I believe.
If Ms Acuri consented, fine. But Ms Edwardes certainly did not. Johnson's behaviour would constitute a crime.
Here's Matt Hancock pretending the incident concerns Mr Johnson's private life rather than Johnson having committed what on Ms Edwardes' account sounds like a sexual assault.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Confused about Greensill? Tl;dr Civil servants and politicians do favours for wealthy businessmen then get vast fortunes when they leave office.
It's playing out in public - and targeted at Cameron - because of Tory score settling in Treasury. But the FT reported that Rishi Sunak interceded on Cameron's behalf.
And I know of a number of pandemic procurement civil servants who have since taken jobs for suppliers.
It matters because whenever a politician or civil servant is thinking about how to keep sweet someone they hope will give them a lucrative job later they are not thinking about how to protect the public interest now.
Scottish lawyers: can anyone help X who has returned from Spain to Glasgow (where their family is) after having attempted suicide? X is being forced to quarantine at a hotel and their family is worried X will attempt suicide again unless they are permitted to quarantine at home.
If you can help please reply and I will DM you the details of an intermediary. Family is not wealthy - and is now poorer by £1,750 - but the intermediary will pay if necessary.
This is troubling. The original reports were unequivocal about the injuries officers suffered. The Chief Superintendent misled the public about the injuries in a way that harmed the exercise of the right to protest. We really should have an explanation. itv.com/news/westcount…
Here's ITV's original report. I'm pretty clear myself that misleading the public is the very opposite of public service.
Imagine the shoe was on the other foot and you had misled a policeman or woman? Very serious inferences would be drawn about your character and conduct, and rightly. Shouldn't we hold the police to at least as high a standard?
Our constitution, such as it is, is a set of cultural norms of which the civil service is the primary guardian. Politicise it (further) and that function will be damaged.
For example, on Monday I spoke to a leading academic about what I believe to be the use of public money for the political purposes of the Conservative Party including advertising and private polling. We will shortly be launching litigation in this space...
... "Ah," he said, "but is legal intervention useful? Can civil servants not be relied upon to secure the right thing is done?" I said the way to test that apple was to taste it, but his answer reveals what is at stake when Govt pursues the politicisation of the civil service.
Postscript on the attack on the women running @ReclaimTS in @PrivateEyeNews. There's a writer there, a man, who had been a supporter of my work. He asked me to brief him on stuff I was doing, on eg tax avoidance, Brexit and procurement and wrote about it there and elsewhere.
There was a week in which I briefed him on a piece featuring our work he was writing for a prominent left wing newspaper.
Then I tweeted about the absurdity of the claims Suzanne Moore had been cancelled emitting from almost every major media platform after leaving the Guardian.