Tonight I saw a pair of raccoons having sex.

I'm on a late schedule these days, so I was walking in a neighborhood in Berkeley. Three raccoons crept up, and I stopped to watch them for a bit. One of them appeared to be vigorously scratching an itch on his(?) back.
Then he sort of stuck out his leg and seemed lick it. (I tried to get pictures, but wasn't fast enough.)
Then, right in front of me, one of them mounted another, and started humping.
This was pretty surprising. All the raccoons that I had so far encountered had been pretty shy and cautious: going to hide in the storm-drains when I got too close, for instance.

But in this case, my being only 2 or 3 yards away did not deter them.
They did look over at me occasionally, and they did slow down when I moved, but that's all.

You'd think that this is a compromising position, and that it would be a survival risk to be having sex near large, unknown animals.
The one on top (the male?) would periodically make a sort of rasping/ clicking "kikikikiki" sound, while his face sort of vibrated. I projected that this was an expression of pleasure.

(I tried to get video, but it was too dark to capture much. Sorry.)
(Notably, they had positioned themselves _right_ in the shadow of a tree. There was decent light on both sides, but they were in the dark. Which is why I don't have good video. Perhaps that was intentional? For safety / privacy?)
I watched them for a few minutes, musing about being an adult male of a sexual species and how I ought to orient to that, and about the meaning we do or don't attribute to sex.

Then I continued on my way.
I came back around to that spot again about an hour later and they were still at it!

In the same spot!

I thought that most animal copulation was pretty brief, but apparently not for raccoons (or at least these raccoons).
Again, you'd think that long copulation times would be a survival liability. But maybe it's a spandrel?

It might be the result of sexual competition?
Now, though, they were much louder, loud enough that I could hear it from half a block a way.

The one on the bottom was periodically making making a piercing, almost screeching noise.

I recorded it: drive.google.com/file/d/1PYv07V…
She(?) would also sort of nip at the top one after making a sound, which led me to project that it was a cry of "ah, don't do that."
Again, it was too dark to get any really clear video. it was much more distinct in person.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eli Tyre

Eli Tyre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EpistemicHope

27 Mar
@meditationstuff,

This seems to have shifted for me in the past few weeks (months?).

It currently seems much more "ok" to not end up with the kind of deep partnership that I have longed for.

I don't know if this is a robust / permanent shift or not.
And I hypothesize that this shift is related to my finding traction in my work / world-saving mission.

Which is pretty interesting. Is romantic partnership a substitute for work that feels meaningful?
How much of my romantic longing was just pica for wanting a sense of progress in my work?

Or the other way around: Is world saving stuff having traction pica for romantic desire?
Read 17 tweets
21 Mar
EAs are my favorite type of people.

Like, if I list my top 5 people in the world, all of them have a very strong EA stain (stronger than that of most EAs).

But I'm also flipping through attendees of EAG reconnect, and feeling boredom / despair.
I'm starting to put my finger on the signs that make me feel pessimistic about talking with someone.

I'm still feeling this out, and none of these are prefect indicators, but...
One bad sign is if a person seems interested in talking about the EA movement, instead of the problems to be solved.

This suggest to me that their intuitive/natural impact model is something like "coalition building", or if I'm being uncharitable, a "pyramid scheme."
Read 32 tweets
20 Mar
I claim that, if it matters for world history who wins WWII (as just one example), then the great man theory of history is straightforwardly correct.
Bismark and Hitler come to mind: if you substitute them with their counterparts from nearby worlds, the power balance of Europe, and the world, looks radically different in their time and, I think, today.
And I think it DOES matter who wins WWII (for instance), because, at minimum, which nations have the "center of mass" of power is going to influence the way the deployment of transformative AI plays out.
Read 6 tweets
18 Mar
Question: Have Moral Mazes been getting worse over time?

Could the growth of Moral Mazes be the cause of cost disease?
I was thinking about how I could answer this question. I think that the thing that I need is a good quantitative measure of how "mazy" an organization is.
I considered the metric of "how much output for each input", but 1) that metric is just cost disease itself, so it doesn't help us distinguish the mazy cause from other possible causes.
Read 6 tweets
18 Mar
This was the most informative and thought provoking youtube video that I've watched in 6 months at least.

It changed my sense of China, and I've made use of the ideas expressed multiple times since I first watched it (different ideas each time, too).

This is the only one that comes to mind as a contender for value per minute.

Again, I would love recommendations that are similar to either of the above.
Read 5 tweets
17 Mar
This seems right to me.

I don't know what the cause is. But my guess is that it has to do with the KIND of threat that each adversary poses/posed.

We COULD acknowledge that maybe Japan had some things right. But we can't acknowledge that about China, without loosing our soul.
The fear of Japan was concrete: in near-mode.

We were afraid that they were going to out-compete us by just being smarter and better at the capitalism game.

They were another western-ish liberal Democracy, like us. But they were going to be better than us at it.
The fear of China is different. It's is ideological, far mode.

Like, it isn't just that they'll win on the merits, but they'll win with (because of?) their evil system.

It's not just a material threat, but also a spiritual threat to American ideals.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!