You can find the rules from tomorrow to "not before" 15 April in Schedule 1 to the Steps (💃🏻🕺🏻💃🏻🕺🏻💃🏻) regulations which is here: legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/364/…
The key thing to understand is that the "being outside home without a reasonable excuse" requirement will go.
What remains:
- Bans on gatherings "indoors" of 2 or more people
- "Outdoors" it's rule of 6 or two households
- Sports and childcare gatherings
Why does it matter that you can be outside for any reason regardless as to whether it is "reasonable"?
Because if you are in a permitted gathering (e.g. 2 households/six random people) that is lawful no matter what the reason, or where you have travelled to in England to gather.
The regulations are confusing as a lot of quite complicated exceptions and definitions but here are the basics:
"indoors" similar to now - 2+ people is a banned gathering unless it falls within an exception
Most common are 'same household' or 'linked households'(bubbles)
A gazebo where the open bit is more than half of the area of the walls would not be indoors
Here are a few gazebos which I think would be fine
Jewish people argue about this every Sukkot by the way (look it up)
This gazebo would, I think, be indoors as it looks like the opening is exactly half the area of the walls, it needs to be less!
Though you might argue the slats which can't be closed are in fact open
See you in court, gazebo!
Anyway, the important thing to understand is that whereas the current lockdown divides the world into "private dwellings" (which include gardens and balconies) and "outdoors", the new rules are about "indoors" and "outdoors"
So a garden or balcony is usually "outdoors"
You can do a lot more outdoors now than indoors.
Outdoors you can meet with 5 other people, six in total - no exception for children under 5
OR two households of any total number
But it has to be one or the other
Note that it can actually be four households if you have
Household A with their linked household (bubble) B
+
Household C with their linked household (bubble) D
There are lots of other exceptions to the gatherings rules many of which we have seen before:
Work, childcare, education, funerals, weddings, picketing, voting, sports gatherings (if organised eg at a sports centre) etc.
A lot of people asking whether the 'stay local' 'rule' is still in place - the government seem to be briefing the press that it is
- This was only guidance anyway
- It is no longer even arguably part of the law
- People should follow guidance but the police cannot enforce it
Am popping out for a bit now, if you have questions post them below
Assignment until I am back: post me pictures of structures you think would be "outdoors" for the purpose of these regulations.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It is obvious now (if it wasn't before) that the Metropolitan Police were confused about the law even after the Holgate judgment on Friday afternoon.
What has been the impact of getting the law on the right to protest wrong during this lockdown?
As I and other lawyers acting for @ReclaimTS have said, the Met Police did not fully understand their legal duties to facilitate safe, peaceful protest.
Apparently @theJeremyVine saying that visiting a second home in England is currently illegal - this is wrong. It is currently legal. There is no *legal* restriction on travel and no legal requirement to stay at any particular home.
1/3
The only relevant legal question is whether you are part of an unlawful gathering. If you are just with your household indoors, or with your linked household, or fall into another exception, it doesn't matter where you are. See my thread 2/3
Today, at 1pm, it will be exactly a year since the first lockdown law, the most significant restriction on our liberties in peacetime, came into force.
Laid before parliament an hour and a half later, debated and voted on many weeks later
‘Muslim media chief’ - Talk about divisive. @miqdaad is in my experience a man of integrity. He rightly calls out islamophobia in the press including @JewishChron. He made a mistake which he apologised for. /1
This sounds like a very important ruling. The first successful court challenge against the lockdown regulations, as far as I know. The rules in Scotland were different to England were communal worship has been allowed throughout the last two lockdowns bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla…
Here is the official summary. Fascinating! Ties constitutionality to proportionality. Finds Scottish government had failed to show less restrictive measures would have achieved the public health aim judiciary.scot/home/sentences…
First thing to say: this is another completely new system.
We have had national restrictions, local restrictions by separate regulations, the first lot of Tiers (1-3), a second national lockdown, new Tiers (1-3+) then Tier 4 added, third national lockdown
Now we have… Steps.
So, instead of being 4 tiers, there are 3 “steps”.
Step 1 is the most severe (confusingly as Tier 1 was the least severe)
Steps work like the Tiers, in that they apply to specific areas.
But at the moment, all we know is that Step 1 applies to all of England from 29 March