Apparently @theJeremyVine saying that visiting a second home in England is currently illegal - this is wrong. It is currently legal. There is no *legal* restriction on travel and no legal requirement to stay at any particular home.
1/3
The only relevant legal question is whether you are part of an unlawful gathering. If you are just with your household indoors, or with your linked household, or fall into another exception, it doesn't matter where you are. See my thread 2/3
There is *guidance* on the gov.uk website which says this about overnight stays. That is guidance only and has no basis in law in relation to England.
Everyone should follow the guidance because it's the right thing to do - but don't mistake it for law 3/3
As throughout the pandemic, the government continue to play this odd game (no doubt with some amateur psychology behind it) of making the guidance stricter than the law, and causing the public and police to be confused. See my @prospect_uk article prospectmagazine.co.uk/essays/adam-wa…
Lots of sense from @PFEW_Chair here on the confusion between law and guidance and the importance to public *and * police of government making this clear
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It is obvious now (if it wasn't before) that the Metropolitan Police were confused about the law even after the Holgate judgment on Friday afternoon.
What has been the impact of getting the law on the right to protest wrong during this lockdown?
As I and other lawyers acting for @ReclaimTS have said, the Met Police did not fully understand their legal duties to facilitate safe, peaceful protest.
You can find the rules from tomorrow to "not before" 15 April in Schedule 1 to the Steps (💃🏻🕺🏻💃🏻🕺🏻💃🏻) regulations which is here: legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/364/…
The key thing to understand is that the "being outside home without a reasonable excuse" requirement will go.
What remains:
- Bans on gatherings "indoors" of 2 or more people
- "Outdoors" it's rule of 6 or two households
- Sports and childcare gatherings
Today, at 1pm, it will be exactly a year since the first lockdown law, the most significant restriction on our liberties in peacetime, came into force.
Laid before parliament an hour and a half later, debated and voted on many weeks later
‘Muslim media chief’ - Talk about divisive. @miqdaad is in my experience a man of integrity. He rightly calls out islamophobia in the press including @JewishChron. He made a mistake which he apologised for. /1
This sounds like a very important ruling. The first successful court challenge against the lockdown regulations, as far as I know. The rules in Scotland were different to England were communal worship has been allowed throughout the last two lockdowns bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla…
Here is the official summary. Fascinating! Ties constitutionality to proportionality. Finds Scottish government had failed to show less restrictive measures would have achieved the public health aim judiciary.scot/home/sentences…
First thing to say: this is another completely new system.
We have had national restrictions, local restrictions by separate regulations, the first lot of Tiers (1-3), a second national lockdown, new Tiers (1-3+) then Tier 4 added, third national lockdown
Now we have… Steps.
So, instead of being 4 tiers, there are 3 “steps”.
Step 1 is the most severe (confusingly as Tier 1 was the least severe)
Steps work like the Tiers, in that they apply to specific areas.
But at the moment, all we know is that Step 1 applies to all of England from 29 March