Thread by @plaforscience

There's enthusiasm in covidsphere over this study

I really LOVE the 1s making emphasis in the 79% that will AVOID hospital attendance, cos the vax PREVENTS symptoms

For an illness cursing ASYMPTOMATIC in 80~85% of the cases it really doesn't look impressive

Except if u're dumb

Of course, the 100% protection is the good news. Surely it's not the perfect 0% risk, but I trust in very high protection.

Risk/benefit looks also good, vax sequels are extremely scarce, and some will be just only correlation, not dependent on jabbing.

The point is if universal vaxing makes any sense.

And it doesn't.

There's negligible risk for all under 60.
In that ages, vaxing protects you from something you are already over 99% protected.

Enthusiasm for protection you NATURALLY have is only a sign of irrational fear.

I wish they had minimised vax harm thru emergency studying and special license.

I wish they've asked same scrupulous, but true scientifical, so called Covid deaths cause attribution.
PCR+, and even SUSPICIOUS symptoms, is a really poor correlation.

I wish they understand vaxing 70% pop is a unfeasible, childish goal.

I wish they understand ANYTHING on Herd Immunity

I wish we could go back to science, when we use respiratory virus' vax properly: vulnerable protection, with humble accept of their flaws&partial protection