Our noun-centric language generates a bias in many that the word balance implies a state that is unchanging. That something that is inanimate is in balance. Search unsplash for 'balance': 
But from a verb-centric frame of reference, balance is a process. Everything that is alive is in movement. To be in balance is to keep something the same while in movement within an environment.
This movement is driven by a multitude of opposing forces, both originating from the self or from the environment. It is a complex process that evolution has been fine-tuning for billions of years.
Physicists have known for over a century that all reality is a process. What we perceive as things are nothing but recurring patterns in processes. Our language, as David Bohm has hypothesized, limits how we perceive reality.
George Orwell wrote "Newspeak was designed not to extend but to diminish the range of thought.” The culprit as to why there is an increasing lack of meaning in modern society is due to the language that evolved since the industrial revolution.
We are nothing bug cogs in the giant machinery of civilization. Cogs that when worn out are replaced by new cogs. The purpose of this machinery is to remake our world into one that can be controlled but is obviously not in balance.
Even Norbert Wiener's cybernetics, despite its emphasis on feedback, was driven by a notion of control. Wiener's contribution to Electrical Engineering was the establishment of a new way of using electricity not just for power but also for control.
But what is control without balance? Control may be an unsustainable temporary balance. IA short-term action that may compromise long-term goals.
Goodhart's law states that when we define a measure so as to control a system, that measure often replaces the original mission of the system. Too often, our noun-centric language seeks those few things to control and as a result our efforts control a proxy and not the actual.
Today's civilization measure for progress is GDP growth. This has not made people any happier or slowed down the destruction of the planet. Yet, we are mindlessly stuck in this inexorable path toward extinction.
In a reality of inexhaustible complexity, we must have models with, as Ashby has coined, requisite variety. edge.org/response-detai…
This cannot be achieved using static models, but only can be done using enactive models that are in tune with the world. To model the world, one must emphasize processes of agility and not models of stasis.
There are two cognitive aspects about homo sapiens that are fundamentally different from the great apes. The first is the inclination for shared intentionality and the second is the ability to coordinate through music.
Music is a verb-centric language. Musical notation captures not only sequence but simultaneity. There is an open-endedness that can be expressed at every moment in time. These are all made coherent in multiple layers of durations in time.
Music is so fundamental to human cognition in that it is one of the last things people with Alzheimer's forget. Perhaps that's because a song is not just a thing. It is something that is experienced and lived.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
