“You’re as secure as the least secure laptop which can push code at any of your dependencies” not broadly adjusted to in tech yet.
And this doesn’t even require malfeasance on behalf of the OSS contributor.

A great deal of the effort to secure my laptop is because of what the laptop could do in someone else’s hands; the world has many laptops and few people paid to secure them constantly.
“What’s the drill if an engineer’s laptop is in a car which is broken into?”
“They won’t be able to log in, because we force a password prompt. But even if they could, would have to elevate privileges to push code. And we’d nuke box / roll chefs when they reported it gone.”
“And what’s the drill if the engineer doesn’t work for us?”
“Uh we hope we learn about it via Twitter before the code hits prod.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Patrick McKenzie

Patrick McKenzie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @patio11

31 Mar
I've been asked recently "What's the importance of the effort if supply problems are improving?" and one of my answers is that it is not a given that supply continues to improve.

The probability space we're preparing for should include a lot of weight for future problems.
I feel like a lot of the discourse around that issue will excoriate low-level technicians and/or the manufacturer for "ruining our perfect plan."

I have had the honor of working in the orbit of a company which has a complex supply chain. Expecting perfection is not a good plan.
Read 5 tweets
31 Mar
I’m really, really confused by “You thought we wouldn’t lie to you, BUT WE DID, hah, you should now forget about that lying thing” strategy.
“Is he subtweeting Volkswagen or the pandemic response?” *cough* Not sure.
(There’s honestly part of me which worries about describing government officials as having made bald-faced lies during the pandemic response, because that could potentially burn political capital, but as God is my witness I don’t think I will ever be able to forget that.)
Read 5 tweets
29 Mar
There are some huge, huge markets in upgrades-in-place of various governmental systems which round to "Put a consumer-grade web UI on top of it and answer questions quickly."
In many cases it will be the first time in history that anyone has ever cared about e.g. ease of task success.

That isn't even meant as bitingly cynical commentary; it's just descriptive. There is no budget or owner for improvement in many cases.
(An underappreciated insight for people who want reform of government processes is that you're not fighting for a change to an artifact you're fighting for change to an org chart, and the government cares about nothing and I mean *nothing* more than it cares about the org chart.)
Read 4 tweets
28 Mar
Surprising absolutely no one working in marketing, a lot of people aren’t so much vaccine hesitant as “I’ve devoted less than 15 seconds of attention to this issue. Somebody will tell me when I need to devote more, right.”
I had a conversation with a person in California who, on learning I worked at VaccinateCA, asked what the story was on general availability. “Work was offering it but didn’t ask yet, figured I wasn’t old enough.” “Where do you work?” “(A pharmacy.)” “You are eligible anywhere.”
“So I have to go back to work and get it?” “Or make an appointment at any pharmacy, say healthcare worker, substantiate with your last pay stub.” “How do I make an appointment?” “... Same way you get anything from a pharmacy.”

(Not actually strictly true; maximized for impact.)
Read 4 tweets
28 Mar
Day 73 at VaccinateCA.com and I've got the update baton.

We tried guesstimating the number of shots in arms delivered as a result of folks getting vaccine information from our site, and came up with ~100,000 or so.
We continued doing the unglamorous but necessary data collection which powers most of our efforts: calling lots of pharmacies. Recent increases in call capacity have let us get to a bunch of lower priority locations and re-call ones which didn't know when they'd get first doses.
This brings us to about 3.5k locations in California with doses available. We're tightening the loop on catching increases in supply (and, relatedly, broadening in enforced eligibility criteria).

A pretty graph demonstrating last two tweets:
Read 6 tweets
25 Mar
"Purchase a car with a financial product that you probably don't fully understand" is the dominant way of buying cars, but this is still amusing to me.
Note that this is a *very non-trivial problem* if you transact in Bitcoin and allow transactions to be reversed, and that none of Tesla's choices are great here.

"I will refund the exact Bitcoin you paid me" means they're writing options to people who speculate in BTC. Not fun.
"Work that math out for me, Patrick."

Assume one Tesla = one Bitcoin = $50k on transaction day.

If the price of 1 BTC goes to $100k, the buyer goes to Tesla and says "Um yeah I'll take that Bitcoin back, thanks", making $50k riskless profit off of Tesla's loss.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!