If there's one thing the peoples' action has taught me, it is that if you leave it to politicians, you'll be waiting 20 years for an answer and still not get one.
Then if you try to get that answer for yourself, you'll end up being told it's not for the people to ask reasonable questions of law about their parliament that politicians have continuously failed to answer.
Simultaneously, you'll be told that politicians love a good mandate - So that's what I am doing.
Ultimately it is for parliamentarians to decide who becomes the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament. In this election, we'll likely have SNP, ALBA and others. Our parliament is going to be a plethora of different viewpoints, and they are going to need a referee."
As an independent, I joined AFI to try and give our case other options and alternatives. But I am and have always been independent.
The current climate has created a catch 22 situation that many are aware of, so I have been forced into standing in this manner as an independent because there was no third option.
However, if I am to do this, I need to try and put forward a positive benefit of electing an independent - and one big one is the fact that when someone becomes a presiding officer, they need to give up their party colours.
A pro-independence independent does not have to do that, and it creates a situation where none of the pro-independence parties has to give up their party colours.
There's also some benefit for when the SNP put their bill to the floor for an independence referendum and the declaration of competency that follows, is made by a Presiding Officer, who through a year-long battle on this very matter has a detailed and intimate knowledge of ...
...all of the questions and opinions surrounding section 30 and referendums". I don't need to learn all the arguments because I have them in the bundle of over 4000 pages of documents.
What the Scottish Parliament needs is a person who can praise and metaphorically knock heads together in equal measure. So I am making my intentions clear from the outset. Im standing on a mandate to become PO.
The question, if I am elected, is whether parliamentarians will respect it.
If people in Mid-Scotland and Fife vote for me, great! If they don't, then fair enough. But the one thing that cannot be said is that I did not try everything within my power to push forward with the case and push forward the debate about the routes to Scottish Independence.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For 22 years, politicians have failed to answer a simple question. When 10,000 ordinary people sought to have it answered, they proclaimed that only politicians should be allowed to answer the question they have failed to.
We live in a nation where the people are supposed to be sovereign. The literal definition of sovereignty is "where power is derived". Telling 10,000 people and their representative you don't have the right to ask a simple question about your own country is not respect...
...for that sovereignty. It's a statement that you believe yourself to be above the peoples right to ask questions - that's just a fact.
But then to use the tax base of those same people to waste time, money and energy...
Politicians make promises and often they break them. I don't. I made a promise to do everything I possibly can to protect the peoples action and to push for the voices of the 10,000 who backed it.
It's extremely easy to criticise when you're not in full possession of the facts, and trust me, if you were, your hair would probably curly. I've asked people to give me a better option. They haven't. I therefore must take the least bad option to try and protect the case.
I do note, however, that those who have used the case for electoral advantage over the past year seem deafly silent on this and have also failed to come up with an alternative. Or should I say have avoided doing so. Go figure.
To be clear - my primary message in Mid-Scotland and Fife is going to be this:
1. Vote SNP on the constituency ballot. 2. In each household place one vote to Alba and One to me as an independent.
So if there are 4 in a house. Thats 2 to ALBA and two to myself.
With a large enough swing of Yes Voters in Fife. That's more than enough to ensure the election of me and multiple ALBA candidates.
It's a strategy that while meaning I am standing in Mid-Scotland and Fife and so are alba, if yes supporters in the region step up to the plate - it will MAXtheYES.
My announcement today has annoyed people - and I want to be upfront and tell you I understand completely. I also want to be upfront and tell you it is that I tried and failed to find a win win option.
The only thing I could do, and which seems to be a recurring theme in the UK, is to select the least bad option.
There are those who will rightly say that my standing as an independent betrays the fact that AFI stood down or ISP stood down. And for some part of that, you're probably right. But when push comes to shove. My first promise was to the 10,000 backers of the #peoplesas30.
To be clear - i'm signalling my intention, if elected to stand as presiding officer of the Scottish Parliament. I'm doing it now to make clear my intent. An independent as PO means nobody from any yes party giving up their membership to become an independent to be PO.
That means no lost votes on the floor of parliament.
Secondly, and some might disagree, but I feel I have proven I can walk the fine line down the middle of party politics.
Thirdly, let's face it, that skill will come in handy because my impression is that parliament is definitely going to need a referee. And better it be a yesser than a unionist.
I face a dilemma, and I am going to say from the outset that I do not want SNP supporters fashioning this into a tool to beat ALBA supporters and I do not want ALBA supporters doing the same - and that goes for all other yessers as well.
Last night I had cause to update the backers in the peoples action - and let me make this clear to the lord advocate and the advocate general - the idea that ordinary citizens don't have the right to ask reasonable questions of the court on matters regarding their own....
....parliament is the single most self-entitled, narcissistic, egomaniacal and ludicrous thing I have ever heard and I will defend to the death the right of the ordinary person to do so - because we're right - politicians work for us, not the other way around. And so do you!