Sen. Case is making a motion to have Medicaid expansion re-referred to Senate Revenue Committee from the Labor/Health Committee. Watch here:
Labor/Health was considered tough (they passed their version of the bill narrowly) but Revenue much friendlier.
"This is the type of decision that may be life or death for the people of Wyoming," Rothfuss said.
"These are uninsured, uninsurable individuals, and we know they struggle," he added. "And we've provided no options, no alternatives, and no debate."
"I know everyone in here feels like they have all the information they need to make a decision," he said. "But I don't understand why we're so afraid to bring this to the floor."
Sen. Scott notes the tight deadline for bills to advance (this is the last week of session). Said the proposal needs more work.
Hicks said that this subject has been debated before and never passed.
"Our colleagues down the hall are debating making animal cruelty a felony," he said. "And I don't want to be accused of beating a dead horse."
"If talking about people that don't have access to adequate health care and disabilities is beating a dead horse then wow, I don't know what to say," responds Sen. Mike Gierau.
Particularly after all the bills done for "people's edification."
Hutchings, a member of Labor, said she'd give it due consideration. But she voted no last time.
"Did anyone have any doubt what would happen to this bill if referred to Labor committee?" asks Case.
"We all know our colleagues like a bookmap," he added. "We all know it's not coming out of there."
Case talking about time when he was "flat broke" in-between marriages when he got sick. When he went in for surgery, he had no option for care, he said. And many people are in the same boat.
"It's pretty darn rough," he said.
He didn't get insured again until he got married.
Adds Revenue committee brought the bill two years ago, because it "brought money into the state."
Rep. Romero-Martinez has attached extensive death penalty repeal language to Sen. Lynn Hutchings' Homicide Amendments bill. wyoleg.gov/2021/Amends/SF…
Rep. Jennings is calling a rules committee to decide whether it's germane or not.
This is a third reading amendment, so if it passes, the House will have overstepped the Senate on death penalty repeal. They killed it pretty soundly on that side of the building.
They could vote not to concur, but that possibly creates challenges for the rest of the bill.
Making this even MORE interesting is the fact Romero-Martinez's name is on the bill as a co-sponsor.
So he could very well be trying to tank a bill he co-sponsored in an attempt to repeal Wyoming's death penalty.
Rep. Romero-Martinez -- the sponsor -- says he wanted to "speak from the heart" as a Republican working to expand Medicaid.
"I'm probably the first person elected to the House [who] lives in dire poverty. but I do know how to take a shower and put on a tie."
Franz Fuchs, of the Dept. of Health, says our traditional Medicaid program is largely made up of low income kids, typically those at around 356% of the poverty level.
We'll be hearing House Bill 162 (the Medicaid expansion bill) in the Senate Labor and Health Committee this morning. (After an abortion bill is finished being heard, of course.)
It's been a wild trip to get here. Two different bills, lots of drama. A quick thread...
The Senate Labor Health Committee (the first one we covered) got this bill first. Surprisingly, it passed by a 3-2 vote to get to the floor.
Why is that surprising? Sen. Troy McKeown -- the swing vote -- had spent the entire meeting railing against "socialist healthcare."
The House sent their version of the bill to the House Revenue Committee, which advanced it 5-3-1.
The bill then went to the floor, where it survived a late maneuver by opponents to keep it from being heard before a key procedural deadline. That effort failed.
We are now hearing Senate File 136, one of the Legislature's many bills to save coal.
Rep. Zwonitzer is introducing an amendment to add the contents of the controversial "net metering" bill (this one: wyoleg.gov/Legislation/20…) to the language after it was tabled in committee.
Rep. Yin called a point of order to say that it was not germane to the legislation, so they are now debating that in a rules committee on the floor.