We'll be hearing House Bill 162 (the Medicaid expansion bill) in the Senate Labor and Health Committee this morning. (After an abortion bill is finished being heard, of course.)
It's been a wild trip to get here. Two different bills, lots of drama. A quick thread...
The Senate Labor Health Committee (the first one we covered) got this bill first. Surprisingly, it passed by a 3-2 vote to get to the floor.
Why is that surprising? Sen. Troy McKeown -- the swing vote -- had spent the entire meeting railing against "socialist healthcare."
The House sent their version of the bill to the House Revenue Committee, which advanced it 5-3-1.
The bill then went to the floor, where it survived a late maneuver by opponents to keep it from being heard before a key procedural deadline. That effort failed.
The Senate -- particularly, Sen. Ogden Driskill -- refused to hear their bill under lots of pressure. It died before the deadline.
Driskill later committed to give it a fair hearing if it passed out of committee. So they sent it to... Labor/Health, who many believe will kill it.
Yesterday, Sen. Cale Case threw something of a "Hail Mary" to give it a better chance of getting it to the floor... he attempted to overrule leadership's decision and recall the bill from Labor Committee and assign it to his friendlier Revenue Committee.
That failed 8-22.
Now we're here in a committee room, with a couple dozen people here to observe and testify.
You can watch here. After the abortion bill is finished.
On this, Sen. McKeown argued that Roe v. Wade is just a legal opinion -- not the same as the Constitution -- and that he could argue abortion is unconstitutional because it violates "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
Pretty sure that's the Declaration of Independence.
(Sorry, I did not plan to tweet on this abortion bill.)
Earlier, he got in a back and forth with a doctor about whether lawmakers with no medical background should be setting policy for physicians against the protests of said physicians.
After being told by a lawyer that the bill they are considering is unconstitutional, Sen. Hutchings also cites "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" as the motivation to advance the bill and appears to argue that the Wyoming Constitution supersedes Supreme Court decisions.
Abortion bill passes unanimously. Starting a new thread for the Medicaid debate.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Rep. Romero-Martinez has attached extensive death penalty repeal language to Sen. Lynn Hutchings' Homicide Amendments bill. wyoleg.gov/2021/Amends/SF…
Rep. Jennings is calling a rules committee to decide whether it's germane or not.
This is a third reading amendment, so if it passes, the House will have overstepped the Senate on death penalty repeal. They killed it pretty soundly on that side of the building.
They could vote not to concur, but that possibly creates challenges for the rest of the bill.
Making this even MORE interesting is the fact Romero-Martinez's name is on the bill as a co-sponsor.
So he could very well be trying to tank a bill he co-sponsored in an attempt to repeal Wyoming's death penalty.
Rep. Romero-Martinez -- the sponsor -- says he wanted to "speak from the heart" as a Republican working to expand Medicaid.
"I'm probably the first person elected to the House [who] lives in dire poverty. but I do know how to take a shower and put on a tie."
Franz Fuchs, of the Dept. of Health, says our traditional Medicaid program is largely made up of low income kids, typically those at around 356% of the poverty level.
Sen. Case is making a motion to have Medicaid expansion re-referred to Senate Revenue Committee from the Labor/Health Committee. Watch here:
Labor/Health was considered tough (they passed their version of the bill narrowly) but Revenue much friendlier.
"This is the type of decision that may be life or death for the people of Wyoming," Rothfuss said.
"These are uninsured, uninsurable individuals, and we know they struggle," he added. "And we've provided no options, no alternatives, and no debate."
"I know everyone in here feels like they have all the information they need to make a decision," he said. "But I don't understand why we're so afraid to bring this to the floor."
We are now hearing Senate File 136, one of the Legislature's many bills to save coal.
Rep. Zwonitzer is introducing an amendment to add the contents of the controversial "net metering" bill (this one: wyoleg.gov/Legislation/20…) to the language after it was tabled in committee.
Rep. Yin called a point of order to say that it was not germane to the legislation, so they are now debating that in a rules committee on the floor.