If you double click on the graph, you can see that after 1 month, for the group of customers who started w you on May 2018, 92% of them were retained.
And by month 2, 75% of the original group that started w/ you in May 2018 was still with you.
4) Eventually, by the end of 1 year, 73% of the original group that started in May 2018 is still retained.
That information is ok in itself, but it's much more interesting as you compare May 2018 with subsequent cohorts.
5) For example, for the cohort that started in Aug 2018, something went really wrong. Retention was bad from the get go after 1 month (only 78% retained) and 68% retained from that group by month 9.
6) This is interesting, because you can go back and see if there was anything that you did differently for that Aug 2018 group.
Did you target customers differently in your marketing compared to before?
Did you change the UX?
7) If you lump all your users together and take average numbers over time, you won't actually know if changes you are making are making things better or worse. But Aug 2018 clearly shows that that cohort was significantly worse.
8) Sometimes significant changes in cohorts occur due to seasonality or changes in an economy (such as COVID!).
But sometimes they are due to changes that YOU have made in your company. And that's what you want to tease out.
9) You can do cohorts in terms of retention percentages such as shown here. But sales for the cohort overall can be another good way to do cohorts.
Why?
10) % of ppl retained is often not the best metric. The fact of life is that you are going to have some churn. And if you churn out your worst customers, that's ok.
What you really want to know is whether your dollars earned in a given cohort is going up or down.
11) For ex, the best SaaS cos still have some churn, but their most loyal customers are upsold to effectively (increase # of seats / price package etc).
So the cohort as a WHOLE actually increases revenue over time *even though the # of customers may be declining over time
12) In SaaS, it's common to use monthly cohorts as the time period. But if you don't have a monthly subscription prod, you'll want to use a diff interval.
For ex, it could be daily users for an app. Or weekly subs for a weekly newsletter. Or quarterly spend for mktg budgets.
13) For more info on cohort analysis, we did a webinar on it:
14) In short:
-Set up cohorts early in your startup to know whether you are getting better or worse
-Select a time period that makes sense for your biz
-If $$ is your KPI, # of ppl who churn is less relevant that dollars churned
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday, @MacConwell, @jefielding & I chatted about valuations yesterday on Clubhouse.
Some thoughts & takeaways from the discussion.
tl;dr: Valuation is NEVER about how much your co is "worth". It's about the price of your equity that you and investors agree upon.
More >>
1) As I like to say, valuations are about supply and demand. Supply of your round / tranche. Demand of investors. It's your job as a founder to generate that demand.
That's what allows you to command a higher valuation. Investors don't just naturally offer you a high valuation.
2) Investor demand increases when you have lots of investors circling AT THE SAME TIME.
It does no good to have 1 investor look now and then approach another investor later. Investors need urgency.
The path to growth isn't just up and to the right. There are often *lots* of plateaus along the way. Those are where ppl get stuck and want to give up.
This applies to your personal life and to your company.
Read on >>
1) We've all faced plateaus in our personal lives. E.g. Learning a new language but can only say hello. Or a new instrument or sport.
Or learning anything. Fun to try new things & get good at the easy bits. Chapter 1 in a textbook is always easy. The rest of the book is daunting
2) The same applies to startups and companies. The beginning is fun. You get some customers. Build a product. Get some learnings.
Happy Monday! - today marks a point in history for crowdfunding. You can now raise up to $5m in the US as of today via crowdfunding.
Today's thread is about crowdfunding -- where do I think it's going? What does the future of fundraising look like?
>>
1) But let's first take a step back.
When you're building a co and you're looking to bring in a co-founder or employees or contractors, you're looking for a team of ppl who can help you advance the co the most.
2) Ppl don't normally think about it this way, but what you look for in investors is identical. Instead of trading time equity, investors trading money for your company's equity.
But money in itself is a commodity. One person's money is the same as anyone else's.
Friday thread on email and how I get to Inbox Zero almost everyday.
On ave, I receive 200-300 emails per day. Here's how I process mine.
>>
1) At a strategic level, I use the Yesterbox email system.
tl;dr - I look at emails that came in yesterday today. So you only have a finite # of emails to process. (but sometimes I "rescue" impt emails that have come in today and answer them today :D)
2) To implement Yesterbox, I use @boomerang to pause my inbox. It holds all emails that I'm not looking at today in a different folder. When I unpause, it brings all those emails into my inbox.