Here's a quick thread on the $UBI coin project that's part of @DemocracyEarth and @Kleros_io on the Ethereum blockchain that @santisiri has recently launched.
First, I have to say, I'm impressed by its approach to UBI which includes some pros and cons.
1. Verified humans receive $UBI in the form of a constant drip. With every second of existence, you get a bit more UBI.
2. Verification is a process that prevents one person from getting more than one account.
3. The currency provided has actual value. (about $450/mo)
Cons:
1. The application process is prohibitively expensive. It cost me about $350 of which $290 was refundable. ($60 was the ETH gas fee)
2. The application process requires the ability to setup and connect an ETH wallet with sufficient ETH, and record a video + post a photo.
The high cost serves to exclude those most in need of UBI, but at the same time, it reduces the number of people cashing out their UBI, which helps maintain the price.
There's also an additional incentive for people to stake their UBI in either the ETH or DAI pools for more UBI.
Over 1,000 people have applied so far, (I'm not sure how many have been successfully verified as of right now) and I would guess that most of them are not low income. I'd also guess that most of them are very tech-oriented and thus likely also disproportionately higher income.
Obviously, this is not the outcome we want, for mostly high income, and mostly white, and mostly male people to receive UBI. (To be fair, I don't have demographic data and am just guesstimating based on the public profiles).
But this approach does have potential. Hear me out.
We don't know yet how to make a successful UBI cryptocurrency. Different approaches need to be tried. Typically, the value is nil. I've accumulated about 1500 G$ via @gooddollarorg since it was launched and that's worth about 33 cents traded for USDC right now.
If $UBI can scale up while still maintaining its value, working out issues along the way and getting a lot of people on board who choose to help maintain its value, then when it gets easier to obtain by those who need it most, it could actually significantly boost their incomes.
The jury is still out on this approach to UBI, but as one of the ones already receiving $UBI with every second of my existence, and at a rate of about $60 a week, I'm excited to see how this one develops.
The results of the basic income experiment in Stockton are in.
BASIC INCOME WORKS.
✅More full-time employment
✅Income stability increased
✅It was mostly spent on essentials
✅Debts were reduced
✅Mental health improved
✅Helped family and friends too
"Unemployment among basic income recipients dropped to 8% in February 2020 from 12% in February 2019. In the experiment's control group — those who didn't receive monthly stipends — unemployment rose to 15% from 14%."
Important to note the difference between increased employment and reduced unemployment. People without jobs were able to get them, but also, people with jobs were able to get better jobs.
Basic income helped recipients afford the costs of better jobs.
BREAKING: A group of 10 senators led by @RonWyden has sent a letter to @POTUS urging him to include automatic stabilizers in his Build Back Better bill. Monthly stimulus payments and boosted UI would continue until certain economic conditions are reached.
For anyone who says that the next bill should focus entirely on infrastructure and not include any cash assistance, please understand that cash is LIQUID INFRASTRUCTURE. Cash can become anything. Liquid infrastructure belongs in an infrastructure bill. 👇
It's fascinating how the GOP can shove through a $2 trillion tax cut for the rich during an economic expansion, but during an economic crisis when alarms are blaring and the Fed is begging for them to go big, they support only $600 billion, despite stimulus checks being tax cuts.
Republicans passed a massive tax cut for the rich, and they did it based on the logic that it would not grow the national debt because the rich would spend and invest more and grow the economy. Stimulus checks are tax cuts for the bottom 80% that would boost the economy far more.
Either Republicans are only for making the rich richer, or they don't understand that every stimulus check that goes out is a tax cut that (because it increases spending) pays for itself to a much greater degree than tax cuts for the rich who have lower propensities to consume.
It's true that a sufficiently high UBI could serve as an alternative to a $15 minimum wage, but I personally would prefer a combo of both plus a 4-day 32-hour week. Let's pay people more for work, support all unpaid work, and distribute employment and leisure time more equitably.
What the left needs to be honest about in regards to a $15 min wage is that although the overall effects will likely be positive, there will be impacts like reduced hours to compensate. Let's lean into that by leaving the 5-day 40-hour week behind. Every weekend should be 3 days.
It's also likely that a higher min wage will increase automation. Great! Let's do that! But that means less employment for humans. 4-day weeks share the available employment better, and universal basic income makes automation literally work for everyone.
The following is a thread translating this short video in French by @benoithamon (he ran for president in 2017) about his new book that is a plea for France to adopt Universal Basic Income (UBI):
Hi everyone, I'm presenting you my new book "The Necessary Courage, My Plea for a Universal Basic Income." After the presidential election I tried to think about visible barriers facing UBI but also the most important ones: the invisible ones.
2/6
What were the budgetary, economic arguments... we heard them a lot but also the psychological, philosophical ones justifying the rejection. Working class people and employees tend to think UBI would stigmatize them if it was completing their salary.
3/6
Because of its unconditionality, basic income is for everyone, but because everyone gets it, we can look at its effects on certain demographics. What would UBI do for single mothers, for foster youth, for Black & LGBTQ communities, for artists, for veterans, for ex-felons, etc?
The pilots popping up all over the place to look at the effects of UBI on specific groups aren't saying that UBI is only for those groups. It's about getting people from different communities to think about the effects of UBI on their own communities.
This is about storytelling.
If you can see yourself in the success story of someone provided unconditional basic income, then you are more likely to see the good sense of it. By creating a tapestry of stories people see themselves in, that's how we build a successful coalition.