This circular from NSE has potential to massively reduce liquidity in market as market makers who are actively giving bid and ask may find it difficult to maintain the optimal order to trade ratio.
Thread on this.
Who are Market Makers ?
These are high frequency traders (algorithms now) which are always there in the market depth to provide entry and exit to various market participants.
They are typically providing bid and ask at every depth of the market. Hence lots of orders.
There is always high order to trade ratio for these market makers as number of trades executed out of these orders are not within their control. Market is very dynamic and one has to remain with their orders to capitalize on any execution on both side.
However they are known for crowding the market with pending orders. Which you can say is bad depending on your point of view.
There are issues of market spoofing which is becoming a global issue with more and more systems sending orders without intentions of executing them.
You can say the culprits of technology overload in modern market structure.
However this needed to be controlled and there are many ways exchanges have done it in the past e.g monitoring and penalizing using order to trade ratio etc.
This new circular makes it more tougher for genuine market makers to bring active liquidity in the system as they will be afraid of adding orders to fulfill the depth.
Infact everyone will prefer to become a price taker and not price giver. So who will give depth ?
Conclusion
This circular will be implemented from 5th Apr.I think many market makers will be careful with their system now as there is no way to monitor any violation that they are getting into as exchange has not shared the exact value of parameters.
This may impact liquidity.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The most simplest way of identifying stocks for your momentum swing trading. Something which has worked for me for years now and hence we have added the model in @mystockedge for individual investors.
After analyzing the financial statement (FY20) of 10 fintech companies, including mine I have come to the following conclusion about Indian fintech customers in this thread:
1. Retail Subscriptions based services has not picked up in India for serious domains like financials
2. Indian consumers love free service and won't mind if you make indirect earnings from them by pushing advertisements and third party products. 3. Difficult to charge customer for advisory as very few people would value the same, especially online
4. Cross selling is the final game, so mutual fund distributors and/or nextgen stock brokers will eventually sell high yield services like loan/global markets etc to their existing customer base.
But question remains will that truly lead to conversions ?
Entrepreneurship is the toughest battle one can fight, especially in India. Major challenges here :
1. The mindset of the majority who want everything free without realising that one who is giving free will eventually take money from them through indirect sources.
Cont....
2. Dynamic regulatory environment leading to volatility in the business model. Most of the time you don't want to take license yet you land up taking irrelevant license.
Cont...
3. Fight against unreasonably hyper funded startups who are more tech-enabled and have little understanding of the subject, yet they are able to sell stories to softbanks of the world. Tech enbalement is good but not the only thing in the stock market.