If, like me, you're dizzied by the back and forth over the Georgia voting law, this is helpful. Seems like the GOP wanted to make the law a lot worse, but backed down after backlash. The law does expand voting access in some ways, ...
... but more in rural (read: white, conservative) areas. The water thing is real, and bad. There are some good parts, like mandating new precincts in areas where there have been long waits. Some provisions seem destined to make vote counting more chaotic. But the worst part is...
. . . kneecapping the secretary of state by giving the legislature control over the election board. Hard not to read that as direct repudiation of Raffensperger for doing his job, and not facilitating Trump's attempt to nullify the presidential election.
And yes, of course, any discussion of this ought to acknowledge the backdrop: 1. Republicans know the more people vote (and the more non-white people vote), the more they lose. 2. The "election integrity" justification is really just reframing Trump's lies about 2020.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don’t know if “defund” cost the Democrats votes among some demographics. Polling suggests so. But polling also suggests they picked up votes among others. Here’s what the Floyd protests definitely did do: They moved the needle on qualified immunity, no-knocks, and police abuse.
They inspired state-level reforms that weren’t fathomable a year ago. Maybe “defund” created room for those positions. Made them seem moderate. However it happened, it happened.
Much of the reaction to that Shor interview has been about points-scoring in the wokeness wars.
It’s been centrists and libertarians who otherwise claim to care about police reform scolding those silly protesters for making unreasonable demands. Here’s the thing: The protests achieved more in eight months than centrists and we libertarians have in decades.
Based on the comments at the WP to my piece yesterday, I think an explanatory thread is in order.
The study I wrote about was designed to see if medical examiners' manner of death determination can be influenced by cognitive bias. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
This is important because we tend to think of an ME's opinion as grounded in science than, much more so than, say, a tire tread or fiber expert. But determining "manner" of death is typically much more subjective "cause" of death. This, despite ...
... the fact that a manner of death determination is profoundly more consequential. If an ME determines a death was an accident, we have a tragedy. If an ME determines a death was a homicide, there's a very good chance someone is going to prison for a long time. As I point ...
I currently know of three men sentenced to death b/c a medical examiner determined a child death the defendant said was an accident to be a homicide. All three determinations have since been challenged by multiple other medical examiners.
First is Jeffrey Havard. Convicted b/c of Shaken Baby diagnosis and sexual abuse claims, all since refuted by multiple other MEs. Judge recently ruled SBS is questionable enough to change death sentence but not conviction. Which doesn't make much sense.
This piece provides receipts for what I agree is regrettable anti-First Amendment sentiment among some elite journalists and academics. (Though I'm not sure it's all that new). But it also undermines its own premise by conflating that with . . .
. . . non-state pressure on private companies (social media, cable providers, app stores, etc.) to prevent the spread of misinformation. It also does some eye rolling at the very idea that misinformation is something worth worrying about. Which I find baffling.
OANN and Newsmax built their audiences flattering the president with favorable coverage so he'd promote them. Which he did. The outlets' sole purpose was to present the lies of the man who led the most powerful country on earth as truth. I just don't see how private actors ...
In the city’s nearly 200 year history, Little Rock’s city council (which is called a board of directors) has never held a no-confidence vote on the city’s police chief. Today, driven by the police union, it will hold one for the black, reformist chief Keith Humphrey.
The head of the police union just stressed the importance of accountability and law enforcement officer being held to the highest standard. So. Ok.
Little Rock blogger Russ Racop just told black opponents of the no-confidence resolution to “Shut the fuck up.” Then told Mayor Frank Scott: “Fuck you, too.”
There are many possible reasons violent crime has spiked this year. Record unemployment. Social upheaval from a pandemic. Mistrust of police. Mistrust of government.
The least likely explanation: defunding the police. Because it hasn’t really happened.
A few cities did immediately abolish some specialty units. But among the dozen or so jurisdictions that cut police funding, most cut only a small percentage, and from what I’ve seen, none of the cuts took effect until FY 2021, which began 10/1. The crime surge began much earlier.
Ah, opponents of police reform say. But the protests still could have spurred the surge in violence, either by encouraging anarchy and mayhem, or by angering police and triggering a de-policing Ferguson Effect.”
So let’s look at crime this year in specific cities: