This is a really interesting and important case - the man has been in solitary for a quarter century. He alleges there’s no reason for it, and that he’s given no serious review.
I should say: his claims were dismissed out of hand. So this is not someone who has had some kind of fact-finding.
The main claim, by the way, is not the flat 8th Amendment cruel and unusual argument, but an argument about the prison's indifference to his deteriorating mental and physical condition.
Anand then turns to her argument about cruel and unusual - she argues that this kind of solitary confinement was unknown in the young Republic.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Pia tells a story of a partner asking her if she could help on a deal. She said "no, no bandwidth." Next thing she saw as an email introducing her to the client and committing her to producing deal dox by the next day. 1/
"Well, I've got this M&A Agreement that has to go out tonight. So realistically tomorrow night."
Email: "Raffi will circulate the draft APA and ancillary agreements tonight. "
Me: "Well, if I get the M&A Agreement out at 2 am, and these guys are in California, so if I send out the APA at 8 am over here that's still sort of tonight."
Livetweeting of very controversial proposal to redistrict the Texas appellate courts.
Why controversial? Skeptics say it is just a partisan gerrymander that creates more Republican courts (to counteract Democrats wins in many of the Texas courts of appeals). #AppellateTwitter.
For people outside Texas who have perhaps a stereotypical view of the politics here, nearly all of the trial courts in cities are held by Democrats, and Democrats control majorities on the big city courts of appeals.
But the legislature is controlled by Republicans. Hence the tension that is alleged to be at the heart of this proposal.
"Virtually every working hour speaking, listening to, reading, or writing English prose" is what I would come up with if you told me to create a perfect job.
Appellate law: like history academia, but every so often a Professor sends you a letter saying the history you wrote was wrong or right, and you get to complain to some other Professors about the Professors' letter.
Listening to some CA5 arguments. I'm not going to link it but one fellow cited a case document in his reply brief. The other people filed a letter saying it was not in the appellate record. Fine.
He... showed up at argument not having checked.
Best practice is to have filed a short thing responding. (I think). Second best is to have the exact ROA cite when you stand up. This you can't do.
In the end he told the Court he wasn't sure if it was there or not, but it makes no difference. Well.