This thread is interesting because it describes academics constrained from speaking what they believe to be true for fear of social consequence while denying that they are “afraid of being canceled” or that such a development is a “crisis of free speech”
It shows how one may describe precisely X but still being constrained from calling it X, thereby...underscoring the depth and intensity of X in the very act...
Thread about my Chronicle of Higher Education piece on this subject:
Elizabeth Warren was a lower-middle class white woman from a middling law school. She did what she had to do.
I'm pointing out that this cuts in both directions: 1.) she stole a position that was supposed to help native people and appropriated it for herself as a white woman, 2.) she was responding to a system that favors POC and a class of wealthy white incumbents.
Her act was far more revealing of the nature of the system than anyone quite lets on
Yang has had a certain Teflon quality throughout the mayoral race and the municipal political lifers who know they have to tear him down to have a chance must also be weighing this imperative against their own political futures if the favorite wins
Calling him a mini-Trump is of course obscenely wrong in one sense, but not entirely wrong in another sense: he gives people an opportunity to vote against the entrenched political system per se for the first time. (And the promise of more competence in being an alternative.)
CDC withdrew guidance that would prioritized essential workers before the elderly (who are the by far the most likely to die from covid) because the latter group was disproportionately white after the guidance attracted controversy.
But here's Scott just going for it.
This is how it works...a tentative trial balloon, then tactical retreat in the face of pushback...then you barrel over the finish line in defiance of the Equal Protection clause because the new elite consensus supports it and nothing ultimately hems in elite consensus
Defending free speech is a precondition of restoring the integrity of truth-seeking within academia, but it is only a precondition. Forms of discipline and abnegation constitutive of the dignity of the vocation must also be resuscitated. patreon.com/posts/on-acade…
It is a bizarre irony that these principles have to be stated at all, and a compounding irony that they must be stated under the cover of pseudonymity. patreon.com/posts/on-acade…
But so it is these days. Some regimes protect the autonomy of truth seeking while others subordinate it to political agendas; in this sense truth seeking is always political. But the integrity of the act itself, where it is permitted, always transcends politics.
Haidt: helicoptering, anti bullying initiatives, and social media psychologically weakened the millennial generation.
Middle schools must discourage use of Instagram.
In Haidt’s view, “anti-bullying” in practice turned into adults hovering over kids and not allowing them to deal with conflict on their own, thus leaving a generation bereft of that crucial social skill and inuring them to demand that authority figures resolve conflict for them
This is an area where I do think discussion of “the marginalized” is merited as there is a differential impact on different sorts of people (including studious, introverted kids) of the free range approach; it’s about striking a certain balance