Share this page!

Mafevema #CommonGround Profile picture
Twitter logo
1 Apr, 6 tweets, 2 min read
Yes they are sleazy. From public contracts to Tory donors to the PM paying for sex with tax payers money.
Then there is Johnson's very close relationship with Evgeny Lebedev & his father, a (former?) agent in the Foreign Intelligence directorate of the KGB, then the SVR, a man who is known to have been a spy based in the Russian London embassy. When Foreign Secretary, Johnson visited
The 2 Lebedev abroad without security details for a private visit. As PM, he celebrated his victory of the GE19 at Lebedev's House where Lebedev threw a lavish celebration party. Imagine if Keir Starmer had a close relationship
with a Russian spy!!! And he is not in power but he would be hounded by the press. Remember how Milliband was attacked about his father's marxist past & aspersions about his family's patriotism & loyalties were liberally cast?
Patriotic Red Wall voters should take note. Johnson has just drastically reduced troops numbers in the Defense review. London & the Tory party's coffers are awash with suspect Russian money. Patriotic? Or compromised?
When will @FT investigate these relationships between the Tory elite & Russian money & agents?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Mafevema #CommonGround

Mafevema #CommonGround Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mafevema

Mafevema #CommonGround Profile picture
3 Apr
I am in despair to still see articles saying: oh but the EU failed because the US vaccinated 38% of its adult population & the UK about 50%.
But these 2 countries didn't export any vaccines & the UK got 21 millions doses from the EU out of 31 millions vaccinated.
The EU allowed exports of 48% of vaccines made on its territory to countries which needed it. HOW MANY MORE WOULD BE VACCINATED IN THE EU IF IT BEHAVED LIKE THE UK AND THE US? 48% MORE. AND HOW MANY LESS IN THE UK? 21 millions less!
The EU behaved ethically & I am proud of it. And if now it blocks AZ vax from EU plants to the UK it is perfectly justified because the UK will still get its UK made AZ production + the EU Pfizer production (more than the AZ vaccines) + in a few weeks the Moderna vaccines. And
Read 6 tweets
Mafevema #CommonGround Profile picture
2 Apr
An excellent programme. For 9 years before changing countries & later becoming a corporate partner in the City, I was a criminal defense barrister. No one who has worked repeatedly with criminals can be in any doubt that traumas does leave huge baggage.

bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/b0…
It leaves its physical imprint on their brain. Visible marks. But there is hope as apparently it can be improved to deliver them from what is a terrible condition & importantly protecting their potential victims
Why more money is not spent on early intervention on young delinquants or troubled children, I simply do not know as it would save so many victims & abusers. It does raise ethical issues - marking a child with a scarlet letter? - but so does prison & a broken life.
Read 4 tweets
Mafevema #CommonGround Profile picture
2 Apr
IMPORTANT: The UKG's argument for justifying a de facto export ban of AZ vaccine is: we spent more & came in early.This is false.
Not only did Germany spent massively more than the UK on Covid-vaccine but 70% of the funding of the Oxford/AZ vaccine didn't come from the UK.🧵
It came from CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations) the charitable foundation set up by the Welcome Trust & Bill Gates fondation:
CEPI gave to Oxford: USD 384 millions
UKG gave: USD115 millions
The figures can be checked here (graph 2).
Now I do not blame the UK for securing exclusivity by undisclosed means (likely naked State power): in December we were in a terrible position
I note though that this was appropriating an invention 70% funded by the world (CEPI funds come from benefactors & public money )
Read 6 tweets
Mafevema #CommonGround Profile picture
1 Apr
BREAKING:
Germany invested massively more than the UK in Covid's research. $1,500 millions ! And Germany + the EU ($350 mollions) spent $1,850 millions + a few millions for Spain & France. The UK invested $500millions.
But Germany did not ask for priority for itself or the EU on the BioNTech vaccine (which would have destroyed the UK Vaccines programme). Whereas the UK boasted about its "superior contract". Different values.
Read 7 tweets
Mafevema #CommonGround Profile picture
1 Apr
In the US it is those suburbs - socially conservative, traditional, aspirational but moderates - which deserted Trump because he went too far & because of C19 whhttps://amp.economist.com/britain/2021/04/03/the-truth-behind-the-tories-northern-strongholds?__twitter_impression=true
Starmer must win them & he won't do this on tales of misery & oppression: those voters are proud of what they achieved.They are a success story. Modest but generally content as long as salary keeps coming in & the kids can hope to do at least as well if not better. It will turn
on the economy & jobs. And then perhaps a dislike or at least distrust - particularly from women- of Johnson if he goes too far. But then Starmer needs to be liked, to form an emotional relationship with those voters, to show he understands and LIKE them. And they need to trust
Read 5 tweets
Mafevema #CommonGround Profile picture
24 Mar
Not for profit? REALLY? Or as disclosed by an unusually truthful PM, capitalism & greed? Massive private profits when the risk has been funded by the taxpayers?
"Pure" scientists at Oxford University or massive PERSONAL beneficiaries? A 🧵 khn.org/news/rather-th…
Under its deal with AstraZeneca, Oxford will receive no royalties during the pandemic but could make millions after it ends through a web of patents including those held by Vaccitech, a for-profit spinoff. Vaccitech’s ownership includes a 50% stake held directly or indirectly
by Oxford & 5.25% each owned PERSONALLY by Hill and Jenner’s other top vaccine scientist, Sarah Gilbert, U.K. regulatory filings show.
The potential for vaccine profits at Vaccitech was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @mafevema has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @mafevema!

Read all threads by @mafevema