After conspiring with the most malign influence in democracy in the English-speaking world, named Murdoch, the country is now considering licensing social-media users and eliminating anonymity. So wrong. WTF is going on down there, Australia?
When I cry "moral panic" about media & government treatment of the internet, this is what I fear. I don't care about FB, Google, et al; they take care of themselves. I fear efforts by vestigial power-elites to control or eliminate the freedoms the net brings to the rest of us.
Media and government want to control speech on the net--directly & by attacking tech companies--because the voices of the people challenge the legacy institutions these self-declared elites still control. This is a moral panic of their invention.
Ah, but you say: isn't public trust in tech falling? Yes, after four years of moral-panic bombardment by media against tech. See @DrTechlash's book, which pinpoints the pivot. books.emeraldinsight.com/page/detail/Th…
(use discount code TECHLASH30)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Jarvis

Jeff Jarvis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jeffjarvis

31 Mar
Facebook head of policy & PR @nick_clegg responds to moral panic about the net, saying we do have agency. I agree.
But I hate this sentence: "Should governments set out what kinds of conversation citizens are allowed to participate in?" Don't even ask.

nickclegg.medium.com/you-and-the-al…
He also says: "The internet needs new rules — designed and agreed by democratically elected institutions..." This is FB's stand lately: Please regulate us. I worry about that regulatory capture & how it will impact new & small competitors. I worry about over-regulation.
But I do agree with @nick_clegg that we do have agency on the net, that personalization has benefits over mass media, and especially that media have responsibility for polarization and disinformation (which media, of course, ignore in their moral panic against the net).
Read 5 tweets
29 Mar
Proud the Product Community of Practice we started at @newmarkjschool's @towknightcenter in Jan. 2016 has grown into @newsproduct.
Thanks especially to @halstraus' hard work + original organizers @pilhofer, @s_m_i, @clockwerks, also @louiegilot & @heatherchaplin & now @dkiesow.
Thanks also to @TowFdn & @knightfdn for funding @towknightcenter's communities of practice. We have others for audience, commerce, talent & inclusion, executives, and independent journalists. This is one way we try to help our industry, convening & aiding its best.
When @pilhofer & @dkiesow started plotting a news product alliance, they reached out to @halstraus & me at @towknightcenter to include our Product Community of Practice: a model of collaboration among journalism schools, thanks to their generosity. Congrats to all.
Read 5 tweets
26 Mar
Microsoft is the Eddie Haskell of tech companies, cynically willing to throw net values overboard for any advantage. Now that I'm off Skype (how'd that acquisition work?), I use no Microsoft products.
wsj.com/articles/micro…
I never set out not to use Microsoft products. Chrome OS et al simply led me there. But lately I'm pissed at Microsoft's dancing with devils in Australia and Congress against net freedoms. I hope this shifts.
I respect Brad Smith but the Microsoft policy stand of late is, I repeat, cynical and opportunistic. I wish the company would decide to stand for net values over exploiting others' PR weaknesses (especially when MS was there first).
Read 4 tweets
25 Mar
Reading legislation by my rep, @RepMalinowski--whom I support & vote for--re #230, the "Dangerous Algorithms Act."
a. It is limited to interference in civil rights & terrorism. Good.
b. But very concerned about that #technopanic language. 1/
malinowski.house.gov/sites/malinows…
c. It applies to any site that uses any "algorithm, model, or computational process to rank, order, promote, recommend, amplify, or similarly alter the delivery or display" content. That means ANY news site; hell, any content site. 2/
malinowski.house.gov/sites/malinows…
d. I fear any opening of the #230 Pandora's Box and the right-wing will enter with their "cancel culture" "neutrality" agenda, no matter what this legislation says. Danger.
e. Demonizing algorithms is not a solution.
@Malinowski has a town hall on this tomorrow. I'll be there.
Read 4 tweets
24 Mar
I'm fed up with perpetrator-centered coverage of crime versus subject/victim-centered coverage.
A brief🧵. 1/
By waiting for declaration of the killer's motive, the perspective in the event is controlled by the killer (did he or did he not write something racist? did he confess to racism?) and the police (with their own systemic issues) 2/
Determination of "motive" is always suspect. See this book by Duke's Alex Rosenberg, which gathers science to question the theory of mind that is the basis of prosecutors', journalists', and historians' claim of determining motive. 3/ amazon.com/How-History-Ge…
Read 10 tweets
19 Mar
Australia's Murdoch law & the US newspaper anti-antitrust bill (see hearing last week) are examples of the unholy alliance of newspapers & government. Another from India: paying for space to run political propaganda. So much for journalistic independence. That is for sale.
Once news organizations decided to sell placement in the flow of news--sponsored or native content--it was not a big leap for government and politicians to buy that space to present their messages as news, neutralizing coverage of them. That's what's happening in India. 2/
Once news organizations decided to lobby government for protectionist legislation, it was not a big leap for government and politicians to ally against the forces of change threatening them both. That's what happened in Australia and is now going on in the US Congress. 3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!