1) User’s Manual to a Possible Preliminary Decision About Reconciliation for Infrastructure
2) Fox is told that we could in fact get guidance today from Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough as to whether Senate Democrats can push the envelope and re-use a budget reconciliation package for components of the infrastructure bill.
3) This would enable Democrats to sidestep a filibuster, potentially a third or fourth time with fiscal-related bills which qualify for the budget reconciliation process. It may be the only way Democrats can advance portions of their agenda.
4) The Budget Act of 1974 contains a provision – heretofore unused - which potentially allows lawmakers to dip back into a reconciliation measure which has already been used, update it, and re-run it on the floor for ANOTHER piece of legislation.
5) So, MacDonough’s possible ruling today would be preliminary. It would essentially tell Democrats that they can or can’t do a triple or quadruple dip.

Note, that any ruling at this stage DOES NOT address policy. It simply speaks to PROCEDURE and POSSIBILITIES for Democrats.
6) Before now, it was generally understood that lawmakers got two options at budget reconciliation in a two-year Congress. There are two budgets for each fiscal year. Thus, a reconciliation vehicle is an option with both budgets.
7) Democrats already used one budget for their coronavirus package in March. Democrats are now planning to use the Fiscal Year ’22 budget reconciliation vehicle for infrastructure. But Democrats will likely break that measure into multiple pieces.
8) Thus, Democrats likely need more than the UPCOMING budget reconciliation package for their TOTAL infrastructure plan. That’s why Democrats are angling for a positive decision by MacDonough to see how many bites at the apple they get.
9) That said, any decision on this particular score only gives Democrats options. It DOES NOT address what Democrats may or may not pack into any reconciliation bill.
10) The actual text of the bill(s) would have to be resubmitted to MacDonough to see if various provisions qualify for the budget reconciliation process.
11) Budget reconciliation forbids policy decisions. Items in a reconciliation measure must be fiscal in nature and budget “neutral,” not adding to the deficit over an extended window.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chad Pergram

Chad Pergram Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChadPergram

2 Apr
1) Rundown of recent violent Capitol security incidents

Some other instances of cars crashing into barricades, USCP shooting suspects
2) In 2006, suspect crashed a car l into similar barricade near the Supreme Court where they were building the Capitol Visitor’s Center. Suspect got into the Capitol before he was apprehended.
3) In 2009, USCP shot and killed two suspects in the Russell Park nearby after they drew guns on officers outside the Capitol after a high speed chase.
Read 4 tweets
1 Apr
1) “Legislative fatigue” could hinder President Biden and Congressional Democrats in their quest to pass a multi-trillion infrastructure bill.
2) Democrats and Republicans spent trillions of dollars last year on coronavirus relief. Democrats just spent $1.9 trillion on their own COVID bill over the winter.

Presidents and lawmakers only have so much political capital when they come into office.
3) President Biden and Democrats incinerated a lot of that capital on the coronavirus measure. But, a long-drawn out slog on a gigantic infrastructure bill could reveal Democratic fissures – especially when dealing with narrow majorities in the House and Senate.
Read 18 tweets
31 Mar
A) When speaking about Biden's infrastructure plan, McConnell says he "can't imagine" that the Brent Spence Bridge between KY/OH via I-75 wouldn't be in that package. Bridge is named after late Dem KY Rep Brent Spence
B) McConnell: If there's any project in America that's eligible this would be it. Somewhere in the bowels of the multitrillion dollars proposal hopefully there is money to fix the bridge. We need it.
C) McConnell notes that even he & Boehner struggled to get replacement for Brent Spence Bridge. On restoring earmarks for the bridge, McConnell says "they do not allow earmarks of this magnitude"
Read 4 tweets
31 Mar
1) McCarthy is in IA today, talking about Dem efforts to overturn House race there. You probably haven’t heard about the GOP effort to contest a seat in Illinois held by a Democrat.
2) McCarthy has been vocal about what he calls Democratic efforts to overturn the election of Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) in favor of Democrat Rita Hart.
3) But McCarthy and other Republicans haven’t said much about a Republican who lost to Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-IL) in Illinois’s 14th Congressional District and similarly appealed the loss to the House Administration Committee.
Read 10 tweets
31 Mar
1) The Hitchhiker’s Guide to How Biden/Democrats Will Sidestep a Filibuster for Infrastructure Package

President Biden and Congressional Democrats have spoken about again using the budget reconciliation process to advance the infrastructure package and avoid a Senate filibuster.
2) This would sidestep the dual requirement to get 60 votes to begin debate on such a bill and 60 votes to conclude debate in the Senate. 

However, reconciliation limits Senate debate and the amendment process.
3) Heretofore, it was believed that two reconciliation options were available in a two-year Congress. Two fiscal years. Two budgets. Two prospective reconciliation vehicles. However Democrats are tinkering with the idea or breaking up the infrastructure plan into multiple parts.
Read 8 tweets
31 Mar
1) Gaetz: Over the past several weeks, my family and I have been victims of an organized criminal extortion involving a former DOJ official seeking $25 million while threatening to smear my name.
2) Gaetz: We have been cooperating with federal authorities in this matter and my father has even been wearing a wire at the FBI’s direction to catch these criminals.
 
The planted leak to the New York Times tonight was intended to thwart that investigation.
3) Gaetz: No part of the allegations against me are true, and the people pushing these lies are targets of the ongoing extortion investigation.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!